believe it or not?????

Ed25 · #1 Postby **Ed25** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:25 pm

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _216.shtml

#2 Postby **Stephanie** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:38 pm

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _204.shtml

I'm not sure what to believe. Twelve hours earlier it's too warm for my area for snow but at 216, the warm air is WAY off shore.

We'll be getting a storm - we'll either be rowing boats or digging out! :eek:

JCT777 · #3 Postby **JCT777** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 1:19 pm

The GFS at 200+ hours? I choose not to believe this. At least not yet anyway.

#4 Postby **Stephanie** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:18 pm

You're right John. I think that what I pointed out is a prime example as to why.

There's something on the horizon, but whether it's to that extent or not is a different story.

yoda · #5 Postby **yoda** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:18 pm

I agree with ya JCT, but the model IF IT WERE TO PAN OUT... would absolutely give like at least 2 feet of snow to my region in D.C..... well I think!

Kelly · #6 Postby **Kelly** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:24 pm

its something to watch, i think. but the details should be taken with a grain of salt.

Anonymous · #7 Postby **Anonymous** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:28 pm

Very comical...this is NOT going to happen

Kelly · #8 Postby **Kelly** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:30 pm

what makes you say it's not going to happen?

Anonymous · #9 Postby **Anonymous** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:38 pm

Kelly, I just do not put much stock in the GFS and history supports the MA does not get hammered two years in a row.

#10 Postby **FLguy** » Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:50 pm

BigEyedFish wrote:Kelly, I just do not put much stock in the GFS and history supports the MA does not get hammered two years in a row.

i think shes on to something. and your WRONG as usual. with the exception of the early december nor'easter, IMO the GFS has done much better than the ECMWF.

believe it or not?????

believe it or not?????

HEY JEB CHECK THIS OUT!!!!

Who is online