FBI orders review of Oklahoma City Bombing

#1 Postby **wx247** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:21 am

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4402583/

Interesting... I have heard many who have voiced concerns that Al Qaeda might have been involved.

#2 Postby **janswizard** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:31 am

This is my opinion only, but if there were other accomplices, don't you think that Terry Nichols would be singing like a bird by now? His trial starts next week.

rainstorm · #3 Postby **rainstorm** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:32 am

certainly possible.

GalvestonDuck · #4 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 10:08 am

I believe that if there were other accomplices, they were white supremacists instead of muslim terrorists (like the article says). Hard for me to imagine a group of punks who use terms like "sand n*gg*r" and "camel jockey" teaming up with anyone from the middle east.

JQ Public · #5 Postby **JQ Public** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 2:33 pm

this is a real stretch...all the evidence points to mcveigh et al. especially since he was a staunch christian.

#6 Postby **wx247** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 3:23 pm

GalvestonDuck wrote:I believe that if there were other accomplices, they were white supremacists instead of muslim terrorists (like the article says). Hard for me to imagine a group of punks who use terms like "sand n*gg*r" and "camel jockey" teaming up with anyone from the middle east.

While I agree with you in your general point, I think that you need to reailze this: there are people who want to bring us down any way they can. If it means working with someone you dislike to bring down the US it will be worth it. Just look at Al Qaeda and Saddam... they disliked each other, but they disliked the US more.

This article does a poor job of pointing out some key issues. One, which was mentioned on FNC a few days ago, was that Terry Nichols was in the Phillipenes not too long before OKC AND also... a high ranking member of Al Qaeda also made a trip there at the same time. It might be coincidence, but it needs to be checked into.

Skywatch_NC · #7 Postby **Skywatch_NC** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 3:29 pm

JQ Public wrote:this is a real stretch...all the evidence points to mcveigh et al. especially since he was a staunch christian.

With all due respect...I find the word Christian in a same sentence with McVeigh totally, well...what he did was pure Evil! :eek:

Eric

JQ Public · #8 Postby **JQ Public** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 3:45 pm

i know...i was just saying that i wouldn't see him mixing with nonwhite muslims when he was a white supremacist christian. I was just drawing the distinction

Skywatch_NC · #9 Postby **Skywatch_NC** » Sat Feb 28, 2004 3:50 pm

JQ Public wrote:i know...i was just saying that i wouldn't see him mixing with nonwhite muslims when he was a white supremacist christian. I was just drawing the distinction

Okay

sunnyday · #10 Postby **sunnyday** » Sun Feb 29, 2004 2:07 pm

I don't like the use of Christian with the name Timothy McVeigh.

#11 Postby **streetsoldier** » Sun Feb 29, 2004 2:24 pm

IMHO, one cannot be a "Christian" and espouse white supremacy at the same time.

It's something like hearing a man telling me he was "in Marine Intelligence"...two words that don't belong in the same paragraph, much less a sentence. :roll:

JQ Public · #12 Postby **JQ Public** » Sun Feb 29, 2004 3:12 pm

Who am i to say what he is. Thats just what i knew him to describe himself as. But i understand y'alls points. So a white supremist isn't a christian, but a terrorist is a muslim?

ColdFront77 · #13 Postby **ColdFront77** » Mon Mar 01, 2004 4:39 am

JQ Public wrote:So a white supremist isn't a christian, but a terrorist is a muslim?

Of course, not all or most Christians are white supremacists and not all or most Muslims are terrorists.

FBI orders review of Oklahoma City Bombing

FBI orders review of Oklahoma City Bombing

FBI review of Oklahoma City bombing

Who is online