GalvestonDuck wrote: How about explaining just what factual errors to which you are referring anyway? If it's such a shame, point them out, please.
Lindaloo says this....
1999: CLARKE DID NOT TESTIFY UNDER OATH; CITING PRIVILEGE
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice on Monday continued to maintain her public testimony before the panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks would represent a breach of separation between congress and the executive -- a claim once used by Bush critic Richard Clarke!
On July 29, 1999, Richard Clarke was scheduled to appear before the Senate Special Committee on the Y2K computer scare.
Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT) chaired the hearing, and made the announcement that Richard Clarke would not be appearing before the committee -- due to a directive by the National Security Council.
This is meaningless DRIVEL. why ?
BECAUSE THE 9-11 COMIMMISON IS NOT PART OF CONGRESS!!!
Duuuhhhhhhh!!!!!!
GAME SET AND MATCH