Troops have ceased/dramatically slowed offensive in Iraq

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Hoosierwxdude
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: Lafayette, IN

Troops have ceased/dramatically slowed offensive in Iraq

#1 Postby Hoosierwxdude » Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:08 pm

According to some reports they have pulled back from some of the hot zones. The reason is supposedly because pressing ahead would entail a large number of civilian casualites. I say they should keep going at it. It's no time to quit now. On the other hand if there would have been more troops in Iraq from the beginning and a push to destroy the insurgency way back when, it orobably wouldn't have gotten to this point. The post-war plan has been terrible and that's why I'm not voting for President Bush in November. There was no plan...or no good plan...to win the peace. I posted a much longer message on WW** about all this but that board is down now and I'm not going to repeat everything I said.
0 likes   

Josephine96

#2 Postby Josephine96 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:13 pm

Hey Hoosier.. I am not voting for Bush in November either.. This war on terror is a bit senseless. It's a war that will never be won.

Yes we caught Saddam and I think we'll catch or even kill Osama 1 day.. But the entire world can't be stopped of terrorist attacks..

Al Qaeda will still have members if Osama is gone, and any Saddam loyalists still around will continue to wish the Americans will get out.

Yes we are the best country on the Earth, but not every country is going to be like us no matter if we send 1 million troops there or 100..
0 likes   

rainstorm

#3 Postby rainstorm » Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:34 pm

Josephine96 wrote:Hey Hoosier.. I am not voting for Bush in November either.. This war on terror is a bit senseless. It's a war that will never be won.

Yes we caught Saddam and I think we'll catch or even kill Osama 1 day.. But the entire world can't be stopped of terrorist attacks..

Al Qaeda will still have members if Osama is gone, and any Saddam loyalists still around will continue to wish the Americans will get out.

Yes we are the best country on the Earth, but not every country is going to be like us no matter if we send 1 million troops there or 100..


thats just way too defeatist in my opinion.
the berlin wall would never fall
communism would never fall
the cold war will last forever
people continue to forget that iraqis want the same things we want. prosperity and a safe future for their kids. will it be easy, no. doint the right thing rarely is. see my other post for more good news.
0 likes   

Rainband

#4 Postby Rainband » Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:38 pm

rainstorm wrote:
Josephine96 wrote:Hey Hoosier.. I am not voting for Bush in November either.. This war on terror is a bit senseless. It's a war that will never be won.

Yes we caught Saddam and I think we'll catch or even kill Osama 1 day.. But the entire world can't be stopped of terrorist attacks..

Al Qaeda will still have members if Osama is gone, and any Saddam loyalists still around will continue to wish the Americans will get out.

Yes we are the best country on the Earth, but not every country is going to be like us no matter if we send 1 million troops there or 100..


thats just way too defeatist in my opinion.
the berlin wall would never fall
communism would never fall
the cold war will last forever
people continue to forget that iraqis want the same things we want. prosperity and a safe future for their kids. will it be easy, no. doint the right thing rarely is. see my other post for more good news.
Helen I never thought I would say this :lol: :eek: but I agree with you 100%. :wink:
0 likes   

chadtm80

#5 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:50 pm

Hey Hoosier.. I am not voting for Bush in November either.. This war on terror is a bit senseless. It's a war that will never be won.

K, so if you dont think a war on terror will work, then what do you think should be done? Just hope the bad guys go away? I can promise you that wont happen.. lol.. Not being a jerk here, im serious. What else do you suggest be done?
0 likes   

rainstorm

#6 Postby rainstorm » Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:55 pm

Rainband wrote:
rainstorm wrote:
Josephine96 wrote:Hey Hoosier.. I am not voting for Bush in November either.. This war on terror is a bit senseless. It's a war that will never be won.

Yes we caught Saddam and I think we'll catch or even kill Osama 1 day.. But the entire world can't be stopped of terrorist attacks..

Al Qaeda will still have members if Osama is gone, and any Saddam loyalists still around will continue to wish the Americans will get out.

Yes we are the best country on the Earth, but not every country is going to be like us no matter if we send 1 million troops there or 100..


thats just way too defeatist in my opinion.
the berlin wall would never fall
communism would never fall
the cold war will last forever
people continue to forget that iraqis want the same things we want. prosperity and a safe future for their kids. will it be easy, no. doint the right thing rarely is. see my other post for more good news.
Helen I never thought I would say this :lol: :eek: but I agree with you 100%. :wink:



awesome!!
0 likes   

Willh

#7 Postby Willh » Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:58 pm

The problem is not "terrorism". Saying that makes it seem a lot easier than it is. The problem is with the ideology of these others countries and religions. You have to ask yourself...why are we, specifically, the enemy?
The problem we have to solve is that we need to find a way to convince these countries we're not evil and that we're not trying to destroy their religion.
Going in their and attacking these places just pisses off a large number of people and gets the ball rolling again. To a people that have been basically brainwashed by their mythology and government...these attacks look like nothing more than proof of what they've feared all along.
So, as someone else said, not sure where, in regards to the war in Iraq...right there you have the next 10 years of recruitment for Al Qaeda made.

The only way to win is to change the ideology of these people, so that they don't believe we're the enemy. If you follow that along to its different conclusions...you'll realize it is literally impossible. It'll be a tremendously lengthy process...
The best thing to do is just to iron out our foreign policy and fix it. It's important to note that our biggest enemies lately were created by our short sightedness...
0 likes   

chadtm80

#8 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:01 pm

The only way to win is to change the ideology of these people,

Change the ideology of Terorist? NO way no how. Not even doctor Phil could take on that one ;-)
0 likes   

Willh

#9 Postby Willh » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:10 pm

chadtm80 wrote:
The only way to win is to change the ideology of these people,

Change the ideology of Terorist? NO way no how. Not even doctor Phil could take on that one ;-)
Exactly...it's almost impossible because you'd need to change their entire belief system.
And so...going over there an attacking is not necessarily the correct thing to do. The war on terror, fought the way it has been...is only going to lead to more and more people over their thinking that our country is trying to destroy them...and will thus incite them to more terrorism to defend their religion.
0 likes   

chadtm80

#10 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:14 pm

Agree Will.. It will cause more harm along the way, but I feel it MUST be done. They think they can just cause terror and get us to back down.. That only means we must be more force full.. imo.
0 likes   

Rainband

#11 Postby Rainband » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:15 pm

Willh wrote:
chadtm80 wrote:
The only way to win is to change the ideology of these people,

Change the ideology of Terorist? NO way no how. Not even doctor Phil could take on that one ;-)
Exactly...it's almost impossible because you'd need to change their entire belief system.
And so...going over there an attacking is not necessarily the correct thing to do. The war on terror, fought the way it has been...is only going to lead to more and more people over their thinking that our country is trying to destroy them...and will thus incite them to more terrorism to defend their religion.
But we also need to show them we won't be intimidated or bullied just because they don't like the way we live ours. It became clear after 911 to most people we must and will take the offensive no matter what the cost. We didn't go kill innocent people for our beliefs like they did on September 11th 01. We are just trying to insure the United states or no other country has to indure another 911. IMHO
0 likes   

Willh

#12 Postby Willh » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:22 pm

Rainband wrote:
Willh wrote:
chadtm80 wrote:
The only way to win is to change the ideology of these people,

Change the ideology of Terorist? NO way no how. Not even doctor Phil could take on that one ;-)
Exactly...it's almost impossible because you'd need to change their entire belief system.
And so...going over there an attacking is not necessarily the correct thing to do. The war on terror, fought the way it has been...is only going to lead to more and more people over their thinking that our country is trying to destroy them...and will thus incite them to more terrorism to defend their religion.
But we also need to show them we won't be intimidated or bullied just because they don't like the way we live ours. It became clear after 911 to most people we must and will take the offensive no matter what the cost. We didn't go kill innocent people for our beliefs like they did on September 11th 01. We are just trying to insure the United states or any other country has to indure another 911. IMHO
The problem isn't that we're trying to fix it...it is simply that we need to do so with more thought given to the future. Think about it...we're the ones who helped both Saddam rise to power...and Bin Laden. What we did with each of them helped us in the immediate future...but then backfired.
And that's because of short sights...and my arguments is simply that we need to be especially more careful of making those sorts of mistakes.
Going into Iraq...and then not having a half decent plan to help them along after we'd taken over is a short sight...and it could prove deadly in the future. That's the problem Hoosier sees with Bush, I think, and the way the war on terror is being fought.
0 likes   

chadtm80

#13 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:28 pm

With all do respect how long do you think a war on terror is/was going to take? We certainly were not going to go in there kill a few and it be all said and done. Sure more attacks are going to come in retaliation of us trying to stop them.. Its inevitable. I just dont understand where people are coming from when they say Bruit force has failed.. Come on, its going to take MUCH longer then we have been at it. Dont say it didnt work, cuase the job is not even CLOSE to being done
0 likes   

Rainband

#14 Postby Rainband » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:30 pm

Willh wrote:
Rainband wrote:
Willh wrote:
chadtm80 wrote:
The only way to win is to change the ideology of these people,

Change the ideology of Terorist? NO way no how. Not even doctor Phil could take on that one ;-)
Exactly...it's almost impossible because you'd need to change their entire belief system.
And so...going over there an attacking is not necessarily the correct thing to do. The war on terror, fought the way it has been...is only going to lead to more and more people over their thinking that our country is trying to destroy them...and will thus incite them to more terrorism to defend their religion.
But we also need to show them we won't be intimidated or bullied just because they don't like the way we live ours. It became clear after 911 to most people we must and will take the offensive no matter what the cost. We didn't go kill innocent people for our beliefs like they did on September 11th 01. We are just trying to insure the United states or any other country has to indure another 911. IMHO
The problem isn't that we're trying to fix it...it is simply that we need to do so with more thought given to the future. Think about it...we're the ones who helped both Saddam rise to power...and Bin Laden. What we did with each of them helped us in the immediate future...but then backfired.
And that's because of short sights...and my arguments is simply that we need to be especially more careful of making those sorts of mistakes.
Going into Iraq...and then not having a half decent plan to help them along after we'd taken over is a short sight...and it could prove deadly in the future. That's the problem Hoosier sees with Bush, I think, and the way the war on terror is being fought.
Hindsight is 20/20. The war on Terror is an unprecedented battle. Who are we to question how it's fought :roll: :roll: Yes we helped saddam and others..at the time we were doing what we thought was right. The lesser of two evils if you will. Just because we made some mistakes in the past doesn't mean the current administration has to forget about our future :wink: I am happy someone finally stepped up to the plate. Better late than never :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#15 Postby Stephanie » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:47 pm

chadtm80 wrote:With all do respect how long do you think a war on terror is/was going to take? We certainly were not going to go in there kill a few and it be all said and done. Sure more attacks are going to come in retaliation of us trying to stop them.. Its inevitable. I just dont understand where people are coming from when they say Bruit force has failed.. Come on, its going to take MUCH longer then we have been at it. Dont say it didnt work, cuase the job is not even CLOSE to being done


I know that President Bush has said it would be an ongoing battle and I believe it. There will always be some radical group that would want to see us defeated. That is why I'm confused as to why the offensive maybe slowing down in those areas. I think after what they did to the 4 American civilians and what they are threatening to do with the current hostages suggests alittle more shock and awe. That is the only thing that these people will understand and yes, it will give them more of an excuse to hate us. We went in with both guns blaring and I think that everyone from the Administration on down to the public understood that it was only going to inflame them. The risk was taken. Now it looks like to me we're going in reverse. :?:
0 likes   

chadtm80

#16 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:52 pm

I havent seen any of the reports about us backing down yet Stephanie so I cant realy debate it untill I see it... But its one of those damned if you do damned if you dont things I think. If we attack more and harder and some civilians die then we get Flamed for that and we are nothing more then Terrorists ourselves yada yada yada etc etc etc.. IF we slow down and pull back so civilians dont die then were not doing what were suppose to and are backing down yada yada yada etc etc etc.. Maybe they are strategicly planing? Dunno, but like I said Ive been at work all day and have yet to see any articles about the situation so I am kind of in the dark with it right now..


BTW anyone see the story about the Japanese hotages they have in IRAQ? They sent a video of them bound and gaged and in a room full of guns and Terrorists and said Japan has three days to pull there troops out of they will kill the 3 hostages!!
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#17 Postby mf_dolphin » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:55 pm

The "pause in offensive operations" has a couple of things behind it. It gives our troops a time to rest and take a break. It gives the diplomats some time to waste. It gives some of the civilian non-combatants time to ecavuate the area. The people we're after there aren't going anywhere ;-)
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#18 Postby Stephanie » Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:58 pm

I understand what you are saying Chad - but I think when we said we were at war with terrorism/Iraq we pretty much said "we don't care what people think". I hope that Marshall is right and it is the calm before the storm.

I've seen the footage of the hostages - it was on the news last night and today. :(
0 likes   

chadtm80

#19 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Apr 09, 2004 7:02 pm

Kewl Steph.. I can assure you that there not going to just stop. There is a reason for the "delay" im sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

The People We're After

#20 Postby Aslkahuna » Fri Apr 09, 2004 7:04 pm

over there will simply blend in with the non combatants and evacuate as well-Vietnam showed how easy it was to do that.

Steve
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests