I'm sorry...but Andy Rooney is pathetic

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
stormraiser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3453
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 4:11 pm
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:

#21 Postby stormraiser » Wed Apr 14, 2004 1:40 pm

There's always Nader. He's trying to scare people into voting for him by saying that the President will be reinstating the draft.
0 likes   

OtherHD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2192
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:01 am
Location: San Antonio, TX

#22 Postby OtherHD » Wed Apr 14, 2004 1:49 pm

stormraiser wrote:There's always Nader. He's trying to scare people into voting for him by saying that the President will be reinstating the draft.


lol...I said a GOOD one. :P
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#23 Postby vbhoutex » Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:43 pm

zwyts wrote:
rainstorm wrote:lets not forget the liberals in the media today are the same ones who grew up spitting on viet nam vets, who hate the cia, fbi, and our military. is it any wonder they are cheerleading for us to lose?


Good Point Rainstorm. I agree with your assertion that liberals are no better than terrorists.


I must disagree with the generalization that liberals are not better than terrorists!!!! There are plenty of liberals that are truly good people with their hearts in the right place and their vote in the wrong place!!!! I am not liberal, but to liken liberals to terrorists(unless they are advocating specific treasonous things(which a few are doing, imo))IS LUDICROUS!!!!
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#24 Postby southerngale » Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:57 pm

vbhoutex wrote:
zwyts wrote:
rainstorm wrote:lets not forget the liberals in the media today are the same ones who grew up spitting on viet nam vets, who hate the cia, fbi, and our military. is it any wonder they are cheerleading for us to lose?


Good Point Rainstorm. I agree with your assertion that liberals are no better than terrorists.


I must disagree with the generalization that liberals are not better than terrorists!!!! There are plenty of liberals that are truly good people with their hearts in the right place and their vote in the wrong place!!!! I am not liberal, but to liken liberals to terrorists(unless they are advocating specific treasonous things(which a few are doing, imo))IS LUDICROUS!!!!


David, Zwyts is liberal and he doesn't believe what he just said. He's just playing games.
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

Guest

#25 Postby Guest » Wed Apr 14, 2004 4:13 pm

vbhoutex wrote:
zwyts wrote:
rainstorm wrote:lets not forget the liberals in the media today are the same ones who grew up spitting on viet nam vets, who hate the cia, fbi, and our military. is it any wonder they are cheerleading for us to lose?


Good Point Rainstorm. I agree with your assertion that liberals are no better than terrorists.


I must disagree with the generalization that liberals are not better than terrorists!!!! There are plenty of liberals that are truly good people with their hearts in the right place and their vote in the wrong place!!!! I am not liberal, but to liken liberals to terrorists(unless they are advocating specific treasonous things(which a few are doing, imo))IS LUDICROUS!!!!


I agree that liberals aren't necessarily as bad as terrorists, but if they do not like or disagree with Bush, then they should leave the country and move to North Korea or France or Canada. The bottom line is if you do not agree with the POTUS then move elsewhere. We don't need ya.
0 likes   

timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

#26 Postby timNms » Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:53 pm

OtherHD wrote:
southerngale wrote:Why wouldn't you want Bush for another 4 years? Think we should cower down to the terrorists and make us more vulnerable for further attacks? Just look at Kerry's voting record where our security is concerned. It's scary. My vote will be FOR Bush as well as AGAINST Kerry. :)


Because I'm a terrorist. All non-Bush supporters are terrorists.

No, seriously, you have proven my point. Kerry's voting record alone makes me not want to vote for the guy. But Bush's foreign policy WRT the War on Terror (which I support, if done the RIGHT way), his homophobic and dualistic attitude, his immigration policies, and his excessive spending, all make me shudder at the thought of casting my vote for him. My vote this year will be against Bush no matter what. I don't know yet if it means voting for Kerry, voting for an independent candidate (should a good one come up), or not voting at all.

(which I support, if done the RIGHT way), What would that be?
0 likes   

OtherHD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2192
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:01 am
Location: San Antonio, TX

#27 Postby OtherHD » Wed Apr 14, 2004 8:13 pm

timNms wrote:What would that be?


Well Tim, I supported the war in Afghanistan and I still do today, and even Iraq at first, until I realized that first and foremost, our goal should have been to capture bin Laden and as many of his top ranking officials as possible. I realize we're still doing that (or in the process of doing it), but I feel that most of our military strength should have been in Afghanistan the whole time. That's what I mean by the "right" way. Stick to the top priority.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests