anyone notive bush is back to saying disarmament is the goal

rainstorm · #1 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:52 pm

not regime change? a very bad sign

#2 Postby **wx247** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:54 pm

No need to speculate at this time. It isn't healthy... we need to focus on the facts.

chadtm80 · #3 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:57 pm

Agree wx

JQ Public · #4 Postby **JQ Public** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 6:02 pm

besides. saddam only violated proposition 1441 which called for war to dissarm if disarmament wasn't done thru diplomacy. starting regime change will further alienate us from the few allies we have left.

JCT777 · #5 Postby **JCT777** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 6:20 pm

JQ Public wrote:besides. saddam only violated proposition 1441 which called for war to dissarm if disarmament wasn't done thru diplomacy. starting regime change will further alienate us from the few allies we have left.

We need to have a regime change or it will be the same ol' same ol'. Which means this situation will come back again in the not-too-distant future.

mf_dolphin · #6 Postby **mf_dolphin** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 7:07 pm

The strike against "leadership" targets should dispel any doubts that Saddam is still a target.

You can rest assured that Saddam will be removed from power as part of the disarmament!

JQ Public · #7 Postby **JQ Public** » Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:37 am

i know i am just saying that is all we said we would do under prop 1441. Everything else is on us. I agree with regime change tho.

anyone notive bush is back to saying disarmament is the goal

anyone notive bush is back to saying disarmament is the goal

Who is online