You've got to admit...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
You've got to admit...
You've got to admit this "disturbance" does look like it's trying to wind up over the Yucatan. You can see deep convection forming around a possible "center", maybe? Oh well it sure is going to make for an interesting weekend.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Nice looking disturbance
Now folks this is a nice looking disturbance.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5

- Posts: 5280
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- Dan
- Tropical Depression

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 11:04 am
- Location: Marion North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: You've got to admit...
Stormcenter wrote:You've got to admit this "disturbance" does look like it's trying to wind up over the Yucatan. You can see deep convection forming around a possible "center", maybe? Oh well it sure is going to make for an interesting weekend.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
convection tends to consolidate around low pressure centers this time of the day, reguardless of whether the low is in the low, mid or upper levels of the atmosphere. I think that is more the case rather than an LLC trying to form.
0 likes
-
chadtm80
PTrackerLA wrote:Seems like a few on here don't want to admit it maybe in fear of busting earlier forecasts...but something is cooking.
come on. Thats not it.... There saying what they think, and the key part is they are giving reasons and data to back up there scenerios.
Last edited by chadtm80 on Fri Jun 11, 2004 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
PTrackerLA wrote:Seems like a few on here don't want to admit it maybe in fear of busting earlier forecasts...but something is cooking.
I wouldn't say that. I personally don't like the odds for this system. I will give it credit when looking at IR satellite, but the VIS shot isn't looking too great. Better than the invest a few weeks ago that everyone harped on, but not too exciting. Essentially the u-lvl low must weaken more before I'll be favorable toward development. Until then, I'm not buying it. We'll see tomorrow if the convection maintains over night. If that occurs, I might lean more favorable as well. Regardless, it has nothing to do with busting forecasts. Maybe I'm a bit of a conservative forecast, but tropical development is overforecast at times. We'll see tomorrow.
0 likes
-
ColdFront77
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
It happens every year... each little wave automatically is granted "tropical storm status." Had the other descent waves this season had developed like many harped... we would be talking about TS Charley forming.... and it's only mid-June!
Regardless, we will have to monitor this system. It may not become a tropical cyclone, but it will be a weather producer. That is what we should focus on.
Regardless, we will have to monitor this system. It may not become a tropical cyclone, but it will be a weather producer. That is what we should focus on.
0 likes
-
ColdFront77
senorpepr wrote:Regardless, we will have to monitor this system. It may not become a tropical cyclone, but it will be a weather producer. That is what we should focus on.
Exactly right, but it unfortunately has to be intertwined in "it's only June" and "development isn't likely, but still possible."
0 likes
-
Josephine96
I would say it's quite possible for the system to develop. It is that time of year even though June storms only happen every other year on average.
We are currently in a period of high tropical activity each season.. so just about anything is possible with a wave.
Plus it does seem to be growing a little healthier.. If the convection can persist and it can develop an LLC.. then the NHC may wanna send a plane out in a couple days.
We are currently in a period of high tropical activity each season.. so just about anything is possible with a wave.
Plus it does seem to be growing a little healthier.. If the convection can persist and it can develop an LLC.. then the NHC may wanna send a plane out in a couple days.
0 likes
-
ColdFront77
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5

- Posts: 5280
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
-
Josephine96
- lilbump3000
- Category 4

- Posts: 966
- Age: 38
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 10:09 am
- Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
- Contact:
- HURAKAN
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
Tropical cyclones in June are rare but possible and what makes this disturbance interesting is that it's located over the most favorable areas for development this time of the year, subsequently, although development may look a little in the impossible side it got the credits for being located where it is. Let see what happens. I give it a 50% for development and 50% for no development, which at the end is an indecisive opinion.
Sandy Delgado
Sandy Delgado
0 likes
-
Josephine96
-
ColdFront77
Josephine96 wrote:60-70 storms huh Tom..Thanks for the numbers.. which means like I said.. probably every other year since records began to be kept..
There were a couple less than 70 named storms in the region I mentioned. Not all of which
formed in this area, but indeed the majorty of them have: Courtesy of The Weather Channel
True there has been on average one storm ever other year in the last 118 years.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: USTropics and 98 guests



