Forget what you are seeing................

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Forget what you are seeing................

#1 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Jun 12, 2004 3:55 pm

headed NW toward TX. This is a mid-UL Low that is forecasted to merge with UL low off southern TX. coast. What the GFS and the more likely scenario that will be crucial for a LLC to form will be well east more off the NE coast of the Yucatan. The GFS in particular develops this LLC and heads it toward the FL Panhandle area. This would also be the most favorable UL area as stated by the NHC. If the convection we now see in the Yuc. channel continues to deepen and clusters in the SE GOM, the GFS may just be on track.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Wnghs2007
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6836
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
Contact:

#2 Postby Wnghs2007 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:02 pm

Well you could be very well right on this one. Because I knew something was wrong with it developing that far west. Oh well all that arguing over a surface low when that might not even be the area of development was for not
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#3 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:08 pm

I just learned on top of this that a TW is entering the picture into the Yuc. Channel, this must be the area of concern for a Surface low to develop. Actually, if we do get this UL low more over toward the TX. MX coast it will be quite favorable UL wind wise from just north of the Yucatan and points eastward where this TW is now being forced more NW.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Josephine96

#4 Postby Josephine96 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:30 pm

Now if it were to head NE.. and hit the Florida Panhandle.. That could also impact our rain chances here.. We could always use more rain :)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#5 Postby wxman57 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:35 pm

The GFS is out to lunch on this one. There's an LLC beginning to form near 23.2N/92.7W. 700mb flow is steering th system NW not NE. I think that this will more likely than not become TD1 tomorrow afternoon when the recon finishes its investigation. Landfall along the mid to upper TX coast on Monday is likely, but all heavy squalls will be displaced well to the east of the center to as far east as MS/AL. Here's the latest image. The apparent weak LLC is west of the convection:

<img src="http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/one.gif">
0 likes   

Rainband

#6 Postby Rainband » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:38 pm

wxman57 wrote:The GFS is out to lunch on this one.
Now theres a surprise :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink: Thanks Chris for the Update!! :wink:
0 likes   

ColdFront77

#7 Postby ColdFront77 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:44 pm

23.2°N, 92.7°W puts the center about 480 miles SSE of Houston, TX, about 495 miles SSW of New Orleans, LA and about 720 miles WSW of Tampa, FL.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38258
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#8 Postby Brent » Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:46 pm

The GFS is out to lunch on this one.


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!! I have to call CNN. :grrr: :)
0 likes   
#neversummer

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#9 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Jun 12, 2004 5:57 pm

I think the vortex moving west will probably die off. I am looking more east near 91.5 for an LLC. I believe this is one of those situations where we get a LLC spin up from a MLC...then the LLC spins off and croaks and a new LLC forms further east.
0 likes   

ColdFront77

#10 Postby ColdFront77 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:53 pm

I see at least one vortex to the right of 92.7°W, too.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#11 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:57 pm

Air Force Met wrote:I think the vortex moving west will probably die off. I am looking more east near 91.5 for an LLC. I believe this is one of those situations where we get a LLC spin up from a MLC...then the LLC spins off and croaks and a new LLC forms further east.



I'm with you Air Force, the current LLC is running out from under any convection and thus us doomed in the dry air. Further east, we have the northern extent of the tropical wave pushing NW across the Yucatan now. This area should emerge overnite into Sunday north of the Yucatan and this is what I believe the GFS is progging on. This new LLC will push northward as it gets caught up in the westerlies and may intensify slightly before landfall.

I posted above for folks to disregard this 700mb low and watch eastward for tomorrow where the new LLC should develop, but we will all have to watch and see.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5280
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#12 Postby PTrackerLA » Sat Jun 12, 2004 7:24 pm

I also agree that a new LLC will form under the MLC further east (about due south of central Louisiana). The clouds in this area have formed a sort of "comma" formation indicative of a mid level circulation center. Now if overnight a new LLC forms in this area we could see this thing go straight to Alex tomorrow when the hurricane hunters are out there. Time will tell we just need to wait for tomorrow!
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#13 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:03 pm

People always bite that first LLC as it moves out from the convection. Fool me 50 times shame on you...fool me 51....

Bottom line is that even though the LLC near 93 is impressive...it will not develop. It is embedded in the low level flow and will continue westward and into the dry air...no chance for this one. Another one will likely form under the MLC near 23/91. THat may have a chance of getting together...but the hsear after 24 hours seems a little too strong for this. We MAY have a hybrid system develop...which seems to be very common the last few years.

Maybe a "Gyre" :-)
0 likes   

elw
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:18 pm
Location: Florida

#14 Postby elw » Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:41 pm

Air Force Met wrote: We MAY have a hybrid system develop...which seems to be very common the last few years.

Maybe a "Gyre" :-)


Which are favored at the start of the season.

It's very hard to get "pure" Tropical development this early in the season. And after all, We're only 12 days into it. I think we're expecting a little too much too soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#15 Postby wxman57 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:50 pm

I agree, that weak swirl we saw today won't be the focus for development. That means the model data initializing a center at 23N/93W are bogus. Watch for possible center reformation (or not) farther east near any heavy convection that persists. Persistence is the key. I haven't seen any blob of convection last more than 4-6 hours yet. Without persistent convection in a single location, there can't be any significant development. I'd say chances of a TD forming tomorrow have diminished.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#16 Postby Stormcenter » Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:03 pm

wxman57 wrote:I agree, that weak swirl we saw today won't be the focus for development. That means the model data initializing a center at 23N/93W are bogus. Watch for possible center reformation (or not) farther east near any heavy convection that persists. Persistence is the key. I haven't seen any blob of convection last more than 4-6 hours yet. Without persistent convection in a single location, there can't be any significant development. I'd say chances of a TD forming tomorrow have diminished.


I still think it has a decent to good shot at being at least a TD.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#17 Postby wxman57 » Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:30 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
I still think it has a decent to good shot at being at least a TD.


I would agree. One thing in its favor is that I don't really want to work all day tomorrow. M-F, it wouldn't stand a chance. :wink:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pepecool20, sasha_B and 54 guests