Oh my goodness! LOL

#1 Postby **wx247** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:05 pm

I was flipping through the channels late last night when I came across a rerun of Hardball. They were showing pics of a Kerry/Edwards rally.

Kerry was playing electric guitar. Sorry, but he looked like a nerd. :lol:

And I am sorry, but someone get Mrs. Kerry OFF THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL before I throw shoes at her!!!

Mrs. Bush, Mrs. Cheney, and Mrs. Edwards are great assets to their spouses while campaigning. Not her... :roll:

Website · #2 Postby **Brent** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:05 pm

HAHA... I saw it too. He looked like a complete goofball.

I want to slap Teresa Heinz Kerry.

#3 Postby **wx247** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:08 pm

LOL... I heard the other day that she almost fell asleep during one of Kerry's speeches. :lol:

(Who wouldn't though??)

And that she detests the Edwards'. You may disagree with Edwards politically, but how could you dislike them as people??

And watch out... Laura Bush and Elizabeth Edwards are both side's secret weapons. Both are wonderful campaigners.

Wnghs2007 · #4 Postby **Wnghs2007** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:28 pm

You know Teresa has only been married to Kerry for 5 years and her last husband died....AND HE HATED KERRY!!!!!!!LMAO!!!! He was righting a memo on him when he died 13 years ago, he was a religious republican. ....Hmmmmm. Maybe TED AND John have something in common. LMAO...(Oh, that was just murder)LOL!!!:D J/K :lol:

Kiko · #5 Postby **Kiko** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:32 pm

Heinz was a bonesman too, you guys know that? He died in a plane crash in 1991, thirteen years ago, not six.

April 4, 1991: Pennsylvania Sen. John Heinz (R). According to AP: A fiery plane-helicopter collision 11 years ago killed U.S. Sen. H. John Heinz III and showered flames on children in a playground. Heinz, a three-term Republican and heir to the Heinz food fortune, died along with the two pilots of his chartered plane and two pilots in the helicopter who were attempting to see if the plane's front landing gear was down and locked in place. The plane's captain had radioed that an instrument light failed to confirm the gear was in place.
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/ ... e.crashes/

Sorry, I don't get it, Brent. Want to slap a woman? Because she dare support her husband in his endeavors?

Care to explain?

Please don't tell me it's her accent, my grandmother sounded just like that.

Lindaloo · #6 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:38 pm

Well I just saw Kerry and Edwards throwing the football at the airport. Kerry needs to get a clue.

Brent, I know what you mean about slapping Teresa. I really want to shake her. lol.

#7 Postby **wx247** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:39 pm

Sorry you feel so offended. I just call them like I see them.

It the ere she creates about herself.

Website · #8 Postby **Brent** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:59 pm

It's not her accent or anything. It's the rhetoric that comes out of her mouth.

Website · #9 Postby **Brent** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:01 pm

Lindaloo wrote:Brent, I know what you mean about slapping Teresa. I really want to shake her. lol.

Hehe...

Kiko · #10 Postby **Kiko** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:13 pm

This violence towards women isn't exactly making me comfortable right this minute. Those tones only make me very very sad for those who would wish to use it.

Why would anyone support a war to free women from violence when they can so perpetrate it themselves? There's a clear need for understanding here, and closed minds just don't get it.

Radical Islam is VERY violent to women and anyone against it should be setting a better example, imho.

Teresa's rhetoric comes from living a life in an international community where she's seen first hand a fair deal of it. That's where the clear understanding of what this world needs comes from.

Up close and personal... and she's been there and still manages to control one of the largest fortunes this race will ever see.

Lindaloo · #11 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:21 pm

Relax please. NO ONE is even remotely close to actually hitting anyone here. It is just a slang for goodness sakes. I say all the time "I'd like to slap the stink outta her or him" That DOES not mean I actually will do it. :roll:

Kiko · #12 Postby **Kiko** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:33 pm

Lindaloo wrote:NO ONE is even remotely close to actually hitting anyone here.

I hope not! We're still online, right?

It is just a slang for goodness sakes. I say all the time "I'd like to slap the stink outta her or him"

How things get lost in translation?

BTW, Teresa was a UN translator out of college. Where she met John Heinz, as a matter of fact.

I still can't help get a sense of the xenophobia that people are so scared of these days. There really are other world views out there and it also upsets me to see Paola be misunderstood.

Website · #13 Postby **Brent** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:35 pm

Kiko wrote:This violence towards women isn't exactly making me comfortable right this minute. Those tones only make me very very sad for those who would wish to use it.

Why would anyone support a war to free women from violence when they can so perpetrate it themselves? There's a clear need for understanding here, and closed minds just don't get it.

Radical Islam is VERY violent to women and anyone against it should be setting a better example, imho.

Teresa's rhetoric comes from living a life in an international community where she's seen first hand a fair deal of it. That's where the clear understanding of what this world needs comes from.

Up close and personal... and she's been there and still manages to control one of the largest fortunes this race will ever see.

*Yawn*

Kiko · #14 Postby **Kiko** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:40 pm

Your comment speaks enough of where your interests lie, Brent, they don't.

Sorry to bore you with another point of view. Why do you post then?

Website · #15 Postby **Brent** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:49 pm

Kiko wrote:Your comment speaks enough of where your interests lie, Brent, they don't.

Sorry to bore you with another point of view. Why do you post then?

Kinda like John Kerry who was "too busy" to get a briefing on the latest terrorist threats or too busy to miss 2/3rds of the votes in the Senate, but yet he found the time to vote against the law protecting pregnant women.

Kiko · #16 Postby **Kiko** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:58 pm

I explained in the "latest ad" thread that that law is designed to infiltrate the privacy between doctor and patient, in order to validate the claim that abortions are immoral.

It is not the place of government to legislate morality. Preserving essential freedoms is. This is the basic difference between our law and Sharia, you realize that don't you?

Or do you wish to validate the claims of the fundamentalists behind our war on terror?

breeze · #17 Postby **breeze** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 2:10 pm

And, to think how I'm offended when someone
"shoots the breeze", around here... :eek:

And, poor Duckie - someone is ALWAYS
screaming, "DUCK!!!"

rainstorm · #18 Postby **rainstorm** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 2:11 pm

since edwards is super rich, couldnt he afford a "trophy" wife?

Guest · #19 Postby **Guest** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 2:21 pm

There really are other world views out there and it also upsets me to see Paola be misunderstood.

Yeah Kiko, Paolo is misunderstood here a lot. The language barrier has much to do with it. I like him and welcome his opinions. He's honest with what he has to say. Unlike other people who say off-the-wall comments just to get something started in here. :roll:

Now that's where I have a problem.
...Jennifer...

Website · #20 Postby **Brent** » Sat Jul 10, 2004 2:22 pm

Kiko wrote:I explained in the "latest ad" thread that that law is designed to infiltrate the privacy between doctor and patient, in order to validate the claim that abortions are immoral.

It is not the place of government to legislate morality. Preserving essential freedoms is. This is the basic difference between our law and Sharia, you realize that don't you?

Or do you wish to validate the claims of the fundamentalists behind our war on terror?

OK ignore the last part. He still as a senator missed 2/3rds of the votes.

and let's not forget all his flip-flops.

"I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it"

Oh my goodness! LOL

Oh my goodness! LOL

Who is online