Martha Stewart
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- TexasStooge
- Category 5
- Posts: 38127
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
- Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
- Contact:
I say no b/c i thought she deserved less. There are bigger fish to fry such as Kenneth Lay of Enron and the Tyco CEO. There are others. If they get anything less than what she does I think it'll be a real injustice. She's already lost her namesake from the company and all her shows and a couple homes...not to mention humiliation. How many of you wouldn't have done smthg if you knew your stock was going to go under?
Last edited by JQ Public on Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
JQ Public wrote:I say no b/c i thought she deserved less. There are bigger fish to fry such as Kenneth Lay of Enron and the Tyco CEO. There are others. If they get anything less than what she does I think it'll be a real injustice. She's already lost her namesake from the company and all her shows and a couple homes...not to mention humiliation. How many of you wouldn't have done smthg if you knew your stock was going to go under?
I don't think Ken Lay knew what was going on with Andrew Fastow and Jeff Skilling. I honestly think (until I hear more proof than just guilt by association) he's not guilty of wrongdoing.
0 likes
Everything goes through the big wigs...nothing happens without their approval. Even if he dind't know he should have some input...especially on fudging documents etc. I still don't know what Enron does...they sure fooled me.
Martha's "wrongdoing" had nothing to do with her company...her company was doing honest business.
Martha's "wrongdoing" had nothing to do with her company...her company was doing honest business.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29114
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
GalvestonDuck wrote:JQ Public wrote:I say no b/c i thought she deserved less. There are bigger fish to fry such as Kenneth Lay of Enron and the Tyco CEO. There are others. If they get anything less than what she does I think it'll be a real injustice. She's already lost her namesake from the company and all her shows and a couple homes...not to mention humiliation. How many of you wouldn't have done smthg if you knew your stock was going to go under?
I don't think Ken Lay knew what was going on with Andrew Fastow and Jeff Skilling. I honestly think (until I hear more proof than just guilt by association) he's not guilty of wrongdoing.
If indeed you are right GD(and I can't disagree at this point)then he truly has to be one of the WORST CEO'S THIS PLANET HAS EVER SEEN!!! And come to think of it, with the assumption that he really did nothing wrong, he has indeed proven my allegation.
0 likes
Well I wish you didn't have to serve any time at all!! Afterall, I pay for that prison time. I think they should hit this kind of crime where it hurts - in the pocketbook. I'm not talking about $250,000. I'm saying they should be fined millions and millions of dollars!!!!! For her crime I'd say $50,000 million would be good.
0 likes
- streetsoldier
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 9705
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Under the rainbow
Pburgh, that sounds like a VERY good idea...have the court divest Stewart of all of her holdings, her business, and all but one of her homes (she has 6 to choose from) in "real and punitive damages"; it would be interesting to see if she can "make it" as a normal, low-to-mid income citizen again.
0 likes
It reminds me a bit about Clarence Thomas' signature comment.
The amount of money she benefitted from amounts to about a person making $30,000 benefitting in the realm of $30-$50. Now, no arguement with if you break the law you break the law but it is most odd that all the resources that were musted happened to be against one of the, if not the, most successful business Women in America. The number of men of her business and social stature that have not benefitted from inside stock info is probably zero.
The amount of money she benefitted from amounts to about a person making $30,000 benefitting in the realm of $30-$50. Now, no arguement with if you break the law you break the law but it is most odd that all the resources that were musted happened to be against one of the, if not the, most successful business Women in America. The number of men of her business and social stature that have not benefitted from inside stock info is probably zero.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests