CLINTON AIDE investigated for theft of 9/11 documents!!

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
rainstorm

CLINTON AIDE investigated for theft of 9/11 documents!!

#1 Postby rainstorm » Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:55 pm

AP: Clinton Adviser Probed in Terror Memos


Email this Story

Jul 19, 9:00 PM (ET)

By JOHN SOLOMON

(AP) Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger is seen Sunday, Feb. 22, 1998, in Washington. Berger,...
Full Image



Google sponsored links
Who's Your Fav President? - Reagan, Clinton, JFK or Nixon. Enter your vote for chance to win.
http://www.winsweepstakes.net

Free Copy of "My Life" - by Bill Clinton. Sign up today to receive your free copy!
http://www.FreeGiftWorld.com







WASHINGTON (AP) - President Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, is the focus of a Justice Department investigation after removing highly classified terrorism documents and handwritten notes from a secure reading room during preparations for the Sept. 11 commission hearings, The Associated Press has learned.

Berger's home and office were searched earlier this year by FBI agents armed with warrants after he voluntarily returned documents to the National Archives. However, still missing are some drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration's handling of al-Qaida terror threats during the December 1999 millennium celebration.

Berger and his lawyer said Monday night he knowingly removed handwritten notes he had made while reading classified anti-terror documents at the archives by sticking them in his jacket and pants. He also inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio, they said.

"I deeply regret the sloppiness involved, but I had no intention of withholding documents from the commission, and to the contrary, to my knowledge, every document requested by the commission from the Clinton administration was produced," Berger said in a statement to the AP.

Lanny Breuer, one of Berger's attorneys, said his client has offered to cooperate fully with the investigation but had not yet been interviewed by the FBI or prosecutors. Berger has been told he is the subject of the criminal investigation, Breuer said.

Berger served as Clinton's national security adviser for all of the president's second term and most recently has been informally advising Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry. Clinton asked Berger last year to review and select the administration documents that would be turned over to the commission.

The FBI searches of Berger's home and office occurred after National Archives employees told agents they believed they saw Berger place documents in his clothing while reading sensitive Clinton administration papers and that some documents were then noticed missing, officials said.

When asked, Berger said he returned some classified documents that he found in his office and all of the handwritten notes he had taken from the secure room, but could not locate two or three copies of the highly classified millennium terror report.

"In the course of reviewing over several days thousands of pages of documents on behalf of the Clinton administration in connection with requests by the Sept. 11 commission, I inadvertently took a few documents from the Archives," Berger said.

"When I was informed by the Archives that there were documents missing, I immediately returned everything I had except for a few documents that I apparently had accidentally discarded," he said.

Breuer said Berger believed he was looking at copies of the classified documents, not originals.

Berger was allowed to take handwritten notes but also knew that taking his own notes out of the secure reading room was a "technical violation of Archive procedures, but it is not all clear to us this represents a violation of the law," Breuer said.

Government and congressional officials familiar with the investigation, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because the probe involves classified materials, said the investigation remains active and no decision has been made on whether Berger should face criminal charges.

The officials said the missing documents were highly classified, and included critical assessments about the Clinton administration's handling of the millennium terror threats as well as identification of America's terror vulnerabilities at airports to sea ports.

Berger testified at one of the commission's public hearings about the Clinton administration's approach to fighting terrorism. The former president answered the panel's questions at a private meeting.

The former national security adviser himself had ordered his anti-terror czar Richard Clarke in early 2000 to write the after-action report and has spoken publicly about how the review brought to the forefront the realization that al-Qaida had reached America's shores and required more attention.

Berger testified that during the millennium period, "we thwarted threats and I do believe it was important to bring the principals together on a frequent basis" to consider terror threats more regularly.

The missing documents involve two or three draft versions of the report as it was evolving and being refined by the Clinton administration, officials and lawyers say. The Archives is believed to have copies of some of the missing documents.

In the FBI search of his office, Berger also was found in possession of a small number of classified note cards containing his handwritten notes from the Middle East peace talks during the 1990s, but those are not a focus of the current criminal probe, officials and lawyers said.

Breuer said the Archives staff first raised concerns with Berger during an Oct. 2 review of documents that at least one copy of the post-millennium report he had reviewed earlier was missing. Berger was given a second copy that day, Breuer said.

Officials familiar with the investigation said Archives staff specially marked the documents and when the new copy and others disappeared, Archives officials called Clinton attorney Bruce Lindsey to report the disappearance.

Berger immediately returned all the notes he had taken, and conducted a search and located two copies of the classified documents on a messy desk in his office, Breuer said. An Archives official came to Berger's home to collect those documents but Berger couldn't locate the other missing copies, the lawyer said.

He retained counsel, and in January the FBI executed search warrants of a safe at Berger's home as well as his business office where he found some of the documents. Agents also failed to locate the missing documents.

Justice Department officials have told the Sept. 11 commission of the Berger incident and the nature of the documents in case commissioners wanted more information, officials said. The commission is expected to release its final report Thursday.

Congressional intelligence committees, however, have not been formally notified.

"The House Intelligence Committee has not been informed on the loss or theft of any classified intelligence information from the Archives, but we will follow up and get the information that is appropriate for the committee to have," the committee said Monday in a statement. "And if it has occurred, we should be informed. If there has been delay in getting the information to the committee we need to know why."

Berger is the second high-level Clinton-era official to face controversy over taking classified information home.

Former CIA Director John Deutch was pardoned by Clinton just hours before Clinton left office in 2001 for taking home classified information and keeping it on unsecured computers at his home during his time at the CIA and Pentagon. Deutch was about to enter into a plea agreement for a misdemeanor charge of mishandling government secrets when the pardon was granted.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#2 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:58 pm

Typical of Clinton and the rest of the dems. They are the most un-American of them all
0 likes   

WXBUFFJIM
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1971
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Baltimore

#3 Postby WXBUFFJIM » Mon Jul 19, 2004 9:18 pm

Definitely a shame.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#4 Postby Stephanie » Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:32 am

How did he get access to them if they were the originals?
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#5 Postby GalvestonDuck » Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:44 am

Stephanie wrote:How did he get access to them if they were the originals?


He was allowed access to the archives so that he could prepare to be questioned by the 9/11 Commission in regards to Clinton's handling of Y2K threats. He was allowed to look at the originals and to take notes -- but none of those documents (not even his handwritten notes) were allowed to leave the archives.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#6 Postby Stephanie » Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:45 am

Thanks Duck for answering that! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#7 Postby j » Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:10 am

My guess is he got lazy and took them home with him to study, clearly breaking the law, but who can blame him??? he was just doing what his boss would have done.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#8 Postby Lindaloo » Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:10 am

Or what his ex-boss told him to do.
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#9 Postby j » Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:15 am

Oh my God...you don't think Slick would have done something so blatantly immoral?
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#10 Postby Lindaloo » Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:17 am

He does not have enough sense to. I was talking about his other brain. lol.
0 likes   

rainstorm

#11 Postby rainstorm » Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:53 am

this is a major scandal.
0 likes   

wxfixer
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:32 pm
Location: Metro Dade (Miami)

#12 Postby wxfixer » Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:20 pm

rainstorm wrote:this is a major scandal.


Yes. Major. The entire Democratic Party is responsible for this and should be held responsible.
0 likes   

rainstorm

#13 Postby rainstorm » Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:30 pm

witness the press reaction to watergate. and, if ms rice had stolen documents you cn be sure the press would be ripping into bush right now
0 likes   

chadtm80

#14 Postby chadtm80 » Tue Jul 20, 2004 1:24 pm

rainstorm wrote:witness the press reaction to watergate. and, if ms rice had stolen documents you cn be sure the press would be ripping into bush right now

Exactly!! It would be HUGE news and all over the place.. People would be chanting impeach..
0 likes   

rainstorm

#15 Postby rainstorm » Tue Jul 20, 2004 1:55 pm

chadtm80 wrote:
rainstorm wrote:witness the press reaction to watergate. and, if ms rice had stolen documents you cn be sure the press would be ripping into bush right now

Exactly!! It would be HUGE news and all over the place.. People would be chanting impeach..


right. did john kerry hire sandy berger to steal those documents?
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#16 Postby Stephanie » Tue Jul 20, 2004 2:27 pm

Let's wait for the news Helen. Smelling blood are we? That's a heck of an implication you're making.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#17 Postby Lindaloo » Tue Jul 20, 2004 2:32 pm

rainstorm wrote:witness the press reaction to watergate. and, if ms rice had stolen documents you cn be sure the press would be ripping into bush right now


AMEN!!!
0 likes   

rainstorm

#18 Postby rainstorm » Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:13 pm

Stephanie wrote:Let's wait for the news Helen. Smelling blood are we? That's a heck of an implication you're making.


berger works for kerry. why?
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#19 Postby PTrackerLA » Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm

Ugh, Clinton makes me sick, I'm not surprised his name is involved in another scandal :roll: .
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#20 Postby Stephanie » Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:04 pm

rainstorm wrote:
Stephanie wrote:Let's wait for the news Helen. Smelling blood are we? That's a heck of an implication you're making.


berger works for kerry. why?


That's true, but implying that someone stole something
did john kerry hire sandy berger to steal those documents?
is a pretty big accusation.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests