Whats the little spin..
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Stormchaser16
- Category 5
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:25 pm
- Location: NW Jersey
- Contact:
Well i said since 1995, not ONLY 1995, but your point is true, that is why i said correct me if i am wrong. Anyway.. rbaker, im not pointing fingers here, your the one that came into this post and started rambling on about ohhhhhh how does this have mroe potential here then it did in the caribbean. Had you not said that then there would have been no reason for me to come back at you. So your point is what? Go ahead and look back at other posts, ive been saying all along that i felt that this had MORE of a shot in the GOM then it did in the Caribbean climatologically speaking. If you cant understand that then I feel bad for you. Not once have i said that ohhhhh rbaker was wrong and this and that. Again if you feel this way, then i feel very bad for you. Not being able to grasp simple concepts is truly said my friend..... truly said
0 likes
-
hurricanedude
- Military Member
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Contact:
-
senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Stormchaser16 wrote:Well i said since 1995, not ONLY 1995, but your point is true, that is why i said correct me if i am wrong. Anyway.. rbaker, im not pointing fingers here, your the one that came into this post and started rambling on about ohhhhhh how does this have mroe potential here then it did in the caribbean. Had you not said that then there would have been no reason for me to come back at you. So your point is what? Go ahead and look back at other posts, ive been saying all along that i felt that this had MORE of a shot in the GOM then it did in the Caribbean climatologically speaking. If you cant understand that then I feel bad for you. Not once have i said that ohhhhh rbaker was wrong and this and that. Again if you feel this way, then i feel very bad for you. Not being able to grasp simple concepts is truly said my friend..... truly said
I think what vbhoutex was getting at is that the seasons during this past decade have been very unusual. For a better, climatological data set, go with a block of time such as 30 years.
0 likes
-
rbaker
stormchaser16, I have looked at your previous post , and you did ask me what happen to that "broad low pressure area in the caribbean". Either you have a short memory, or need to read your last post to me, because that's exactly what you said. For better or worse, I'm not trying to press my point like you do, I've seen your previous post, not just to me but to some others. I have no objections to disagreements, but your tone has been noticed by others on this forum. So before another shot is fired by the north in this civil war, let's cool it, you keep your remarks to others here, and I'll do the same.
0 likes
-
Stormchaser16
- Category 5
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:25 pm
- Location: NW Jersey
- Contact:
Not trying to create trouble hurricanedude, but whatever you wanna think is fine....
Rbaker: Again i ONLY said that after you came into this post and started complaining about how i cant say that the wave has more of a chance here then it did in the Caribbean, ive been reading the posts and only after that did i ever start to defend that i have been saying this. The only thing that ive been saying to others was that it was my personal belief that the wave had more of a chance in the GOM then the Carib. , since the wave crossed the Yucatan, not once have i said haha look i was right, you were wrong. And im not going to, all i want to do though is make it clear that climatogically speaking, the wave has/had a better shot here. Again if you think that im attacking you, or have been attacking you, or anyone else, then im sorry but im not. Yes, i did make the comment about the broad circulation, but only after you commented to me, so go back and take a second look and youll see that.
And for the comment on my tone: I havent noticed too many people who have a problem with my postings, if you or anyone else does, then i apologize for that, but my posts are not meant to be intentionally directed or attacking another member unless provoked. While my tone may be a bit less "friendly" or "happy" with every sentence, this is just my style of posting, but again im sorry that anyone takes offense to this. Fact of the matter is that ive posted on many boards, and i have actually been admin of a few boards that have since gone under due to financial circumstances, without people having a problem with me. So to you rbaker and to those like hurricane dude, who think im trying to start a problem- bottom line- im not!
Rbaker: Again i ONLY said that after you came into this post and started complaining about how i cant say that the wave has more of a chance here then it did in the Caribbean, ive been reading the posts and only after that did i ever start to defend that i have been saying this. The only thing that ive been saying to others was that it was my personal belief that the wave had more of a chance in the GOM then the Carib. , since the wave crossed the Yucatan, not once have i said haha look i was right, you were wrong. And im not going to, all i want to do though is make it clear that climatogically speaking, the wave has/had a better shot here. Again if you think that im attacking you, or have been attacking you, or anyone else, then im sorry but im not. Yes, i did make the comment about the broad circulation, but only after you commented to me, so go back and take a second look and youll see that.
And for the comment on my tone: I havent noticed too many people who have a problem with my postings, if you or anyone else does, then i apologize for that, but my posts are not meant to be intentionally directed or attacking another member unless provoked. While my tone may be a bit less "friendly" or "happy" with every sentence, this is just my style of posting, but again im sorry that anyone takes offense to this. Fact of the matter is that ive posted on many boards, and i have actually been admin of a few boards that have since gone under due to financial circumstances, without people having a problem with me. So to you rbaker and to those like hurricane dude, who think im trying to start a problem- bottom line- im not!
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: USTropics and 117 guests