Why is Frances moving W to WSW now?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Guest

Why is Frances moving W to WSW now?

#1 Postby Guest » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:09 pm

The last few satellite loops look like its move west for sure now, so how long will this last?
0 likes   

User avatar
lilbump3000
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 966
Age: 38
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 10:09 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Contact:

#2 Postby lilbump3000 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:10 pm

This might last for atleast 36-48 hours as it will be under the influence of the building ridge. Also look for an increase in forward speed as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148497
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#3 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:27 pm

Wobbles.Hurricanes move on stairsteps.If you see after 6 frames that movement then is a trend.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2779
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

#4 Postby Frank P » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:32 pm

For the past 90 minutes she has been practically due west.... NO southern component at all... in fact the very lastest pix showed an almost insignificant wobble north, over all I say at best she's going just north of due west at the moment...
0 likes   

TheShrimper
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:05 pm

#5 Postby TheShrimper » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:34 pm

It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#6 Postby x-y-no » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:38 pm

Looks to me like today's average is just a little north of west. Maybe 280 or so, not more than 285.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#7 Postby x-y-no » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:40 pm

TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.


LOL ... who knows, maybe you're rihgt and I'm wrong. I've always been a little shaky at eyeballing angles. :-) My upper estimate and your lower one aren't too far apart, though.
0 likes   

tampastorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:22 pm
Location: TAMPA

#8 Postby tampastorm » Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:43 pm

Northerly, I say definantly if anything more southerly then northerly.
0 likes   

User avatar
hial2
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Indian trail N.C.

#9 Postby hial2 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:09 pm

The 1800 NHC mdel suite initilized Francis 1 degree west from the 1200 model suite, SAME latitude..

Seems to me that at least between those times,heading DUE west
0 likes   

golter

#10 Postby golter » Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:12 pm

It has been stairstepping for 3 days now. It has just begun another NW jog.
0 likes   

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 72
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

#11 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:16 pm

TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.


Based on the latest vortex message the storm has moved due west since 11:00.

B. 18 DEG 47 MIN N
55 DEG 14 MIN W
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

#12 Postby Derecho » Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:28 pm

CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.


Based on the latest vortex message the storm has moved due west since 11:00.

B. 18 DEG 47 MIN N
55 DEG 14 MIN W


Wrong.

It's the old "minutes of arc" error. VORTEX statements use minutes of arc..60 minutes to a degree.

NHC statements convert that into Tenths of a degree.

The VORTEX places Frances at 18.8 N, 55.2 W.

Frances has gained .2 degrees of latitude since 11AM. Hence, it's NOT moving due West.
0 likes   

Guest

#13 Postby Guest » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:26 pm

Does it still look like a wobble, or more of a trend?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ola
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 11:24 pm
Location: Dorado, Puerto Rico

#14 Postby Ola » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:32 pm

Derecho wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.


Based on the latest vortex message the storm has moved due west since 11:00.

B. 18 DEG 47 MIN N
55 DEG 14 MIN W


Wrong.

It's the old "minutes of arc" error. VORTEX statements use minutes of arc..60 minutes to a degree.




NHC statements convert that into Tenths of a degree.

The VORTEX places Frances at 18.8 N, 55.2 W.

Frances has gained .2 degrees of latitude since 11AM. Hence, it's NOT moving due West.


Correct me if I am wrong, but do they use minutes because of the curvature of the earth? Minutes is used for angles.
Last edited by Ola on Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5936
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#15 Postby MGC » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:36 pm

It is difficult to ascertain a heading using satellite looping. It will give you are rough direction but not a heading to a certain degree. That is why the hurricane hunter are there. Frances has been heading in a general west direction all afternoon......MGC
0 likes   

Guest

#16 Postby Guest » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:41 pm

You know Derecho, I respect your meterological abilities as well as many others on this board but, lets call it like it is, a chicken is a chicken, same as a duck is a duck, now any reasonably intelligent individual can see a complete westward motion, dominating any gain in latitude. Watch the loop for yourself. Its this type of denial that caught S. Florida with their pants down with Charley.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html

If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.

Brian
0 likes   

User avatar
Ola
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 11:24 pm
Location: Dorado, Puerto Rico

#17 Postby Ola » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:46 pm

Frederic1979 wrote:You know Derecho, I respect your meterological abilities as well as many others on this board but, lets call it like it is, a chicken is a chicken, same as a duck is a duck, now any reasonably intelligent individual can see a complete westward motion, dominating any gain in latitude. Watch the loop for yourself. Its this type of denial that caught S. Florida with their pants down with Charley.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html

If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.

Brian


Movement bearings are calculated with something like 6 hour averages. A loop is not a 6 hour loop. If you could pick any time interval to calculate bearing you could have a diferent movement for a system every 30 minutes. In order for forecast and analisys to make sense and be valid you need consistency, and I mean use the same measuring parameters all the time so data can be compared.
0 likes   

Guest

#18 Postby Guest » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:49 pm

Ola wrote:
Frederic1979 wrote:You know Derecho, I respect your meterological abilities as well as many others on this board but, lets call it like it is, a chicken is a chicken, same as a duck is a duck, now any reasonably intelligent individual can see a complete westward motion, dominating any gain in latitude. Watch the loop for yourself. Its this type of denial that caught S. Florida with their pants down with Charley.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html

If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.

Brian


Movement bearings are calculated with something like 6 hour averages. A loop is not a 6 hour loop. If you could pick any time interval to calculate bearing you could have a diferent movement for a system every 30 minutes. In order for forecast and analisys to make sense and be valid you need consistency, and I mean use the same measuring parameters all the time so data can be compared.



This loop is over 5 hrs in length, what are you talking about?

Brian
0 likes   

User avatar
Ola
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 11:24 pm
Location: Dorado, Puerto Rico

#19 Postby Ola » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:49 pm

On the other hand , Frances could move due west for the next 6 hours. NHC called a 290 movement and that means what it HAD been doing.
0 likes   

Guest

#20 Postby Guest » Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:51 pm

Well when we don't have current recon data alot of people on this board use satellite loops to base their conclusions, so why can't we say Frances has had a WSW dwooble 8-)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests