Brand New GFDL much further LEFT

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
logybogy

Brand New GFDL much further LEFT

#1 Postby logybogy » Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:48 pm

Image
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#2 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:50 pm

That is scary. The GFDL is perhaps the NHC's most trusted model and if it turns more towards FL that is not good. But I am still going to wait for the data from the NOAA jet and the model runs from that data to fully see what is happening.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

das8929

#3 Postby das8929 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:50 pm

Wow only one of those models doesnt show a hit on Florida!
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#4 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:53 pm

Umm....Only one of those models show a hit on Fla...
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#5 Postby dhweather » Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:54 pm

Actually, only one shows a hit on Florida, the
rest show a trend. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1190
Age: 50
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

GFDL not "most trusted"

#6 Postby Weatherboy1 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:21 pm

I would disagree that the GFDL model is one of the NHC's most trusted models. Its performance has been hit or miss on various storms. But it IS significant that it shifted substantially westward. As opposed to hooking N-ward along 74W, Frances is progged by this model to hook N-ward along 77W. That makes me more nervous.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: GFDL not "most trusted"

#7 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:12 pm

Weatherboy1 wrote:I would disagree that the GFDL model is one of the NHC's most trusted models. Its performance has been hit or miss on various storms. But it IS significant that it shifted substantially westward. As opposed to hooking N-ward along 74W, Frances is progged by this model to hook N-ward along 77W. That makes me more nervous.


It and the NOGAPS have been the 2 "rightwingers" of the bunch. Now even they are coming around.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#8 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:31 pm

I've noticed that NOGAPS and GFDL have been the two worst models with Frances so far - each forecasting a turn to the north at about 72 hours all along Frances's track. The GFS has been one of the better models so far, along with LBAR for some goofy reason. I guess a busted clock is right twice a day. ;-)

I think that some of the models may underestimate the tendency for a major hurricane to pump up the ridge to the north and continue moving more westward than forecast. Thus, I think south Florida is really under the gun here.

Also, the general tendency for most of the dynamic models this season has been too slow and too far north. Not good for south Florida, either.
0 likes   

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2163
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

#9 Postby Steve H. » Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:24 pm

Obervation Here. The models seem to be slowly converging on a solution, which while not looking good at the moment, could change quite a bit over the next few days. The good news is that Frances is moving slowly. This may buy more time for the pattern to cahnge before getting closer to the Bahamas and thereafter. The bad news is, I don't quite buy some of the slower models. Once the ridge rebuilds and flexes some muscle, I would expect that she will begin to pick up forward speed, then begin to strengthen when she gets to the base of the ridge. The fact that Hermine formed tells me that when hermine evacuates to north/northeast, as well as what's left of Gaston, we will get a ridge rebuilding that's stronger than progged earlier today. This may be what the models are picking up on, particularly the one's that were the right outliers. Still early in the game, but I think by Tuesday night/Wednesday, we should have a pretty good idea of where this is going. It gets a bit easier to predict when you get stronger steering currents as this ridge should provide. This still could end up in the GOM after crossing somewhere on the Fl peninsula. Nail biting time :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#10 Postby Stormsfury » Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:29 pm

wxman57 wrote:I've noticed that NOGAPS and GFDL have been the two worst models with Frances so far - each forecasting a turn to the north at about 72 hours all along Frances's track. The GFS has been one of the better models so far, along with LBAR for some goofy reason. I guess a busted clock is right twice a day. ;-)


Blind squirrels find acorns once in a while ...

Actually, the LBAR is quite good with storms in the deep tropics, but once recurvature points, and TC's get north of 20º, fuhgetaboutit ...

I think that some of the models may underestimate the tendency for a major hurricane to pump up the ridge to the north and continue moving more westward than forecast. Thus, I think south Florida is really under the gun here.

Also, the general tendency for most of the dynamic models this season has been too slow and too far north. Not good for south Florida, either.


Interesting points and pretty much agree.

This time around, the ECMWF is progging an extension of the WATL ridge over South Carolina which will serve to keep Frances south of the Carolinas and keep Frances moving westward or WNW ... and even more so frightening, conditions looking at the other height maps, support a potential deepening storm coming in ... but we'll not discuss that part this far out ...
0 likes   

User avatar
Scott_inVA
Storm2k Forecaster
Storm2k Forecaster
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:44 pm
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Contact:

#11 Postby Scott_inVA » Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:37 pm

wxman57 wrote:I've noticed that NOGAPS and GFDL have been the two worst models with Frances so far - each forecasting a turn to the north at about 72 hours all along Frances's track. The GFS has been one of the better models so far, along with LBAR for some goofy reason. I guess a busted clock is right twice a day. ;-)

I think that some of the models may underestimate the tendency for a major hurricane to pump up the ridge to the north and continue moving more westward than forecast. Thus, I think south Florida is really under the gun here.

Also, the general tendency for most of the dynamic models this season has been too slow and too far north. Not good for south Florida, either.


Frances verification thru 96 hours as of 29 Aug 18Z:
LBAR still First Place
GFDL goes to second
TPC drops to third ( but only by a mile or so)
GFS is fifth
NOGAPS is in eigth place
UKMET and A98 are performing worse than NOGAP...with Frances, that's saying something!

Scott
0 likes   

caneman

#12 Postby caneman » Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:40 pm

Scott_inVA wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I've noticed that NOGAPS and GFDL have been the two worst models with Frances so far - each forecasting a turn to the north at about 72 hours all along Frances's track. The GFS has been one of the better models so far, along with LBAR for some goofy reason. I guess a busted clock is right twice a day. ;-)

I think that some of the models may underestimate the tendency for a major hurricane to pump up the ridge to the north and continue moving more westward than forecast. Thus, I think south Florida is really under the gun here.

Also, the general tendency for most of the dynamic models this season has been too slow and too far north. Not good for south Florida, either.


Frances verification thru 96 hours as of 29 Aug 18Z:
LBAR still First Place
GFDL goes to second
TPC drops to third ( but only by a mile or so)
GFS is fifth
NOGAPS is in eigth place
UKMET and A98 are performing worse than NOGAP...with Frances, that's saying something!

Scott

I'm sure you get your info from reliable sources. But it seems to me that GFS has outperformed GFDL. Am I missing something?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#13 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:41 pm

Scott_inVA wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I've noticed that NOGAPS and GFDL have been the two worst models with Frances so far - each forecasting a turn to the north at about 72 hours all along Frances's track. The GFS has been one of the better models so far, along with LBAR for some goofy reason. I guess a busted clock is right twice a day. ;-)

I think that some of the models may underestimate the tendency for a major hurricane to pump up the ridge to the north and continue moving more westward than forecast. Thus, I think south Florida is really under the gun here.

Also, the general tendency for most of the dynamic models this season has been too slow and too far north. Not good for south Florida, either.


Frances verification thru 96 hours as of 29 Aug 18Z:
LBAR still First Place
GFDL goes to second
TPC drops to third ( but only by a mile or so)
GFS is fifth
NOGAPS is in eigth place
UKMET and A98 are performing worse than NOGAP...with Frances, that's saying something!

Scott


Perhaps my perception about the GFDL recurving it too much is based on post-96hr positions.
0 likes   

User avatar
WeatherNole
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:18 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Contact:

Good point . . .

#14 Postby WeatherNole » Sun Aug 29, 2004 10:18 pm

Steve H. wrote:Obervation Here. The models seem to be slowly converging on a solution, which while not looking good at the moment, could change quite a bit over the next few days. The good news is that Frances is moving slowly. This may buy more time for the pattern to cahnge before getting closer to the Bahamas and thereafter. The bad news is, I don't quite buy some of the slower models. Once the ridge rebuilds and flexes some muscle, I would expect that she will begin to pick up forward speed, then begin to strengthen when she gets to the base of the ridge. The fact that Hermine formed tells me that when hermine evacuates to north/northeast, as well as what's left of Gaston, we will get a ridge rebuilding that's stronger than progged earlier today. This may be what the models are picking up on, particularly the one's that were the right outliers. Still early in the game, but I think by Tuesday night/Wednesday, we should have a pretty good idea of where this is going. It gets a bit easier to predict when you get stronger steering currents as this ridge should provide. This still could end up in the GOM after crossing somewhere on the FL peninsula. Nail biting time :roll:


Steve touched on a very good point here. The premise that Frances will move in some sort of a westerly direction is based on building, strong high pressure to the north. Strong high pressure to the north would lead to a somewhat rapid westerly component to the movement. A slower movement is more in line with a weaker ridge of high pressure, and of course a weaker ridge would allow for more of a northerly component to the movement. I'd keep an eye on what the models do with the ridge the next few runs - which is strongest, weakest, etc.

Mike

--
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 389 guests