Frances Advisories
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
- TexasStooge
- Category 5
- Posts: 38127
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
- Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
- Contact:
MWatkins wrote:The NOGAPS and GFS models bring the core of the hurricane very close to the Florida east coast and suggest a landfall further to the north. This scenario is currently favored by the NHC. The UKMET model is further to the west....and the 00Z European model once again presents a direct impact on south/central Florida. The Canadian model takes the storm into the Florida Keys. The spread in the guidance late in the period is a result of how these individual models handle features well upstream (west) of the hurricane as they rotate around the globe and potentially impact the hurricane.
Looks like another one we'll have to keep an eye out for. We don't know how much more Florida could take.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Frances #11 surrender left
Forecast takes bias down to northern Florida and Georgia. Not a bad jump for a day's work, but importantly, a northwestward turn is still included.
http://www.nencweather.com/tropicalweat ... ances.html
http://www.nencweather.com/tropicalweat ... ances.html
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
I think you need to shift your attention either further south (quoting you) to Florida. I'm not sure which model you are biased towards (everyone has their favorites)...but I think if you will look at the trend to the west...where most of the models have been with the exception of a run or two...you will see you might want to focus your attention on our friends in Florida.
A very good statement was made by the NHC at 5...which they have said before...and some of us have been saying for a while:
THE BAD NEWS FOR THE BAHAMAS AND
FLORIDA PENINSULA IS THAT THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT MID-LATITUDE
TROUGH IN THE CURRENT MODEL FORECASTS THROUGH 5 DAYS THAT COULD
SUBSTANTIALLY WEAKEN THIS RIDGE.
A very good statement was made by the NHC at 5...which they have said before...and some of us have been saying for a while:
THE BAD NEWS FOR THE BAHAMAS AND
FLORIDA PENINSULA IS THAT THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT MID-LATITUDE
TROUGH IN THE CURRENT MODEL FORECASTS THROUGH 5 DAYS THAT COULD
SUBSTANTIALLY WEAKEN THIS RIDGE.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Very good post
Air Force Met wrote:I think you need to shift your attention either further south (quoting you) to Florida. I'm not sure which model you are biased towards (everyone has their favorites)...but I think if you will look at the trend to the west...where most of the models have been with the exception of a run or two...you will see you might want to focus your attention on our friends in Florida.
A very good statement was made by the NHC at 5...which they have said before...and some of us have been saying for a while:
THE BAD NEWS FOR THE BAHAMAS AND
FLORIDA PENINSULA IS THAT THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT MID-LATITUDE
TROUGH IN THE CURRENT MODEL FORECASTS THROUGH 5 DAYS THAT COULD
SUBSTANTIALLY WEAKEN THIS RIDGE.
Air Force Met I hate to keep on saying this but another
VERY good post. I agree 100% with your response.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Air Force Met, they have shifted the position to the left as you know. I'm about 20 miles south of Melbourne Florida at 28N/80.5W. Do you think that the shift may continue to go further west and south? Like through the Florida straits into the GOM. Please figure out a way to get this outta here!! LOL
Seems like we're still days away from this becoming a serious threat to our area. Is the margin of error decreased now since this morning, and has the GIV data been included in the data the 5pm discussion is based on? And could this weaken a bit when it slows??? Any info would be greatly appreciated. signed....nervous again near Melbourne. 


0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:44 pm
- Location: FWB Fla.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:09 pm
- Location: Lauderhill, Fla./Jefferson, Ga.
New High Coming in from Great Lakes reg. to steer Frances??
Was just watching Roland Steadham local met from miami, he was saying that another Hi is going to be moving in behind the current hi that is steering Frances. The way he was describing it seemed to be that it didn't really matter if the current Hi weakened on the western edge, because this new one coming in would still keep Frances on a more westardly course. Any thoughts or further info on this?
0 likes
- Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
Once Frances' eyewall replacement cycle is complete ...
Expect a quick and radical strengthening to take place, with a potential for a 15 mb dropoff in a matter of hours ... the storm is currently getting better organized with a very healthy poleward outflow channel in the order of 30-40 kts, along with good outflow south and north, fair eastern ...
Parameters of rapid intensification are close to being met ...
Parameters of rapid intensification are close to being met ...
0 likes
- mf_dolphin
- Category 5
- Posts: 17758
- Age: 68
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
- Location: St Petersburg, FL
- Contact:
If you're on a high speed connection try the 250M version of the same picture! Dial-up users, don't even try!
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/gall ... 0.250m.jpg
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/gall ... 0.250m.jpg
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests