1500 utc frances, stronger in GOM

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derek Ortt

1500 utc frances, stronger in GOM

#1 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:53 am

track reasoning the same as earlier, slight shift after 1st landfall


http://www.nwhhc.com/atl062004forecast.html


graphic (and possibly the final one) in just a few minutes
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#2 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:06 am

0 likes   

kevin

#3 Postby kevin » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:07 am

thanks derek
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#4 Postby yoda » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:07 am

Derek Ortt wrote:graphics are now at http://www.nwhhc.com/atl062004graphics.html


IMHO, I really think that Frances will not go that far west in the GOM, but I have no backup as its just a feeling.

Otherwise, Good stuff there Derek!
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38264
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#5 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:07 am

:( :eek:
0 likes   
#neversummer

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:13 am

if CMC, UKMET, and NOGAPS 12Z runs are even farther into the Gulf, or even as far as the 0Z runs, then I will have to shift toward the worst case scenario
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#7 Postby yoda » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:14 am

Derek Ortt wrote:if CMC, UKMET, and NOGAPS 12Z runs are even farther into the Gulf, or even as far as the 0Z runs, then I will have to shift toward the worst case scenario


What would that be Derek? A hit on NO?
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#8 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:15 am

yoda wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:if CMC, UKMET, and NOGAPS 12Z runs are even farther into the Gulf, or even as far as the 0Z runs, then I will have to shift toward the worst case scenario


What would that be Derek? A hit on NO?


I hope not. I have family (brother) there.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#9 Postby skysummit » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 am

yoda wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:if CMC, UKMET, and NOGAPS 12Z runs are even farther into the Gulf, or even as far as the 0Z runs, then I will have to shift toward the worst case scenario


What would that be Derek? A hit on NO?


I'd say most likely a hit just south of NO from the east.
0 likes   

User avatar
cape_escape
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 745
Age: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:39 am
Location: Cape Coral Florida
Contact:

#10 Postby cape_escape » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:19 am

Thast track can't be good for those in Punta Gorda.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38264
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#11 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:20 am

yoda wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:if CMC, UKMET, and NOGAPS 12Z runs are even farther into the Gulf, or even as far as the 0Z runs, then I will have to shift toward the worst case scenario


What would that be Derek? A hit on NO?


Yeah. I haven't seen NOGAPS or CMC, but the UKMET shows a catastrophe for all of Southern Louisiana moving the system due west near the Mouth of the Mississippi River and then to a position SW of New Orleans putting them in an onshore flow, plus in the worst part of the hurricane(right-front quadrant)
0 likes   
#neversummer

Derek Ortt

#12 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:25 am

well, those devestated by charley need to prepare for yet another major hurricane. Damage will likely be "light" in those areas though as there is nothing left to damage
0 likes   

Superstorm
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:04 pm

#13 Postby Superstorm » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:28 am

Also, that track would indicate the potential for serious issues with Lake Okechobee. What are your thoughts here, Derek?
0 likes   

dwinpcola
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 10:14 pm

#14 Postby dwinpcola » Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:59 am

Mr D , what would you think the wind speed might be once in GOM and at landfall in the GOM. Your graphic brings it near me.

dw
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#15 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:03 am

Right now the nwhhc forecast is 95KT

okeechobbe may see 1928 flooding if it makes a direct hit
0 likes   

B-Bear
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:43 am

#16 Postby B-Bear » Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:26 am

Do you think the reinforced earthen dam is strong enough to sustain a strong cat 4 or cat 5 hurricane, or are you suggesting a possiblity for dam failure exists?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Missiles

#17 Postby Steve Cosby » Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:29 am

Derek Ortt wrote:well, those devestated by charley need to prepare for yet another major hurricane. Damage will likely be "light" in those areas though as there is nothing left to damage


The one that got me was a reference to "missiles" created by broken tree limbs that have not yet been collected and asking people to put them in their garages.

Never would have guessed that one...
0 likes   

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#18 Postby The Big Dog » Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:36 am

Derek Ortt wrote:Right now the nwhhc forecast is 95KT

okeechobbe may see 1928 flooding if it makes a direct hit

They didn't have much in the way of a dike in 1928 -- just a hill of dirt mostly. They have a much better dike now, although it has shown signs of leaks in recent years. I seriously doubt a 1928 catastrophe.
0 likes   

lurkerinthemidst
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:07 pm
Location: Hudson,FL & Cleveland, TN

#19 Postby lurkerinthemidst » Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:40 am

If I am reading right does this put the storm to the south of Tampa meaning Storm surge for them? Throwing in the newbie flag again!
0 likes   

lurkerinthemidst
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:07 pm
Location: Hudson,FL & Cleveland, TN

#20 Postby lurkerinthemidst » Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:42 am

If I am reading right does this put the storm to the south of Tampa meaning Storm surge for them? Throwing in the newbie flag again!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost and 55 guests