Major concern with extreme cyclone forecasting & west Ca

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4258
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Major concern with extreme cyclone forecasting & west Ca

#1 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:40 pm

I have a great concern about the NHC's ability to come up with a forecast track for such an extreme cyclone in the Western Caribbean. Don't get me wrong, I am not one to bash the NHC, and that is not what this post is about. Their track forecasts as of late have been pretty much right on the money. If I recall the last major hurricane of this magnitude in this area was Mitch in 1998. Mitch was forecasted by the NHC and the models to move NW and into the GOM. Many decisions were based on that forecast and eventually ended up costing many lives. The Windjammer Cruise ship Fantome was lost as a result of Mitch along with its crew of 30 people. The captain of the Fantome, Guyan March took the ship and ran south along the coast of South America to avoid Mitch's forecasted track. Unfortunately he ended up sailing right into the eye of the storm when Mitch went SW and the ship was never heard from again. The point I'm getting at is that it is so rare to see a storm of this magnitude in the western caribbean that maybe there isn't enough evidence or experience with them to accurately predict a future track. Ivan's "wandering" around between Jamaica and the Caymans already has me worried that this storm may fool all of the forecasters and go on a path that no one or no model has even shown yet. I know models and computers have become much more advanced since 1998 but major hurricanes such as this are still one of nature's forces on earth that cannot be understood. Once again this is not an NHC bash so please don't take it as that. I have the utmost respect for the people at the NHC, especially after dealing with Frances last week head on. I still don't have my power yet. I was just making an observation on what the last "Major" hurricane in this part of the world did versus where it was supposed to go. Any comments are welcome.

SouthFLTropics
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#2 Postby bahamaswx » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:48 pm

I knew 2 of the crew members of the Fantome.

As for Ivan; NHC does the best they can. Can't ask for more than that.
0 likes   

User avatar
tronbunny
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Central FL

#3 Postby tronbunny » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:50 pm

Maybe the A98E knew something we didn't.

I all honesty, I think that is why they keep it.
We need to be reminded that there is still much to learn about the Physics of nature.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4258
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

#4 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:53 pm

I agree that the NHC does the best they can. I don't want anyone to think that I was saying they don't do their best. It would be nice though if some more money could be spent on additional recon missions when a storm like this comes along. It is very rare that this happens and the more we can learn about them when it does the better off we will be in the future. I'm all for getting as much data as possible and then some when a Cat 5 is within recon range. I believe it would be money well spent on the additional missions. I would hate to think that political issues are tying up money that could be spent for additional research. Cat 5 storms seem to be a horse of a different color versus all other storms and what is going on inside of them needs to be known.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tri-State_1925
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Worcester Hills, MA

#5 Postby Tri-State_1925 » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:53 pm

I don't think that storm strength has anything to do with it. From what I've seen over the years, the experts can be way off with storms in the Caribbean and GOM. It can definitely be a funky area to forecast.

All I want to see from the NHC is UNDERSTANDABLE warning. I thought they didn't do a good job of forecasting or warning people of Charley's extreme strength, but they did a good job with Frances.
0 likes   

RichG
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:23 am
Location: Wellington Florida

#6 Postby RichG » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:54 pm

I have been thinking the same thing. Mitch did not do what they thought it would. Maybe there is something with such powerfull storms. NHC does a great job but this is a differnt animal all together.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4258
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

#7 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:56 pm

Maybe you are correct Tri-state...maybe it does have something to do with the area of the Western Caribbean and GOM. Something needs to be done though to try and get as much research and data as possible when a storm like this occurs.
0 likes   

User avatar
Galvestongirl
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:13 am

#8 Postby Galvestongirl » Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:02 pm

I always thought, and correct me if I am wrong, that a hurricane of this magnitude made its own environment, and essentually went the direction it wanted too.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 203 guests