Gradual turn beginning?

Agua · #21 Postby **Agua** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:37 pm

It's definitely west of the forecast track, but look at it from the full 12 hour loop, rather than from one frame to the next.

#22 Postby **webke** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:37 pm

All I see is better outflow to the NE side of the storm, I do not see a change in direction

latemodel25 · #23 Postby **latemodel25** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:38 pm

Im seeing a little more north too. maybe just a jog.

Fodie77 · #24 Postby **Fodie77** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:38 pm

BensonTCwatcher wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-vis-loop.html

watch the whole storm not just eye. We'll need at least 4 more frames...to be sure

Hmm, I can kind of see it now if you look at it that way.

lilbump3000 · #25 Postby **lilbump3000** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:38 pm

Im looking at it from the 11:45UTC till the 18:15UTC and i see it moving WNW if not due W in the last few frames up to 18:15UTC

das8929 · #26 Postby **das8929** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:40 pm

Yea I notice it alot more on the visible loop, especially looking at the whole storm. Definitely preparing for a NW turn.

Anonymous · #27 Postby **Anonymous** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:41 pm

Yeah...sure...okie dokie.

:sleeping:

lilbump3000 · #28 Postby **lilbump3000** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:41 pm

Well it seems that the visible and infrared tell to different stories. So we will see in the long run.

freeport_texas2005 · #29 Postby **freeport_texas2005** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:42 pm

still wnw...that iant no north turn

das8929 · #30 Postby **das8929** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:42 pm

I sense alot of -removed- going on.

#31 Postby **patsmsg** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:44 pm

BensonTCwatcher wrote:If you watck the outer circle of the storm you see it. If you look at the eye it's harder to see. we'll need a couple hours to verify

Isn't it the direction of the eye that matter's? :?:

I mean, it's not like the rest of the storm is going anywhere without the eye...

I'm not saying it's not about to turn, but I certainly do not see it by watching the eye; and to me, if the eye doesn't turn, there is no turn.

AL Chili Pepper · #32 Postby **AL Chili Pepper** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:44 pm

I sure don't see it. Looks like he's moving WNW and hasn't deviated one bit.

lilbump3000 · #33 Postby **lilbump3000** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:44 pm

Lets get one thing straight im not -removed-, now on visible loop it seems to tell a different story then the infrared loop. So we will see in the long run on what this system going to do.

#34 Postby **dhweather** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:44 pm

The eye is what the overwhelming majority of us track storms by.

Judging by the whole storm, he's also grown south.

BensonTCwatcher · #35 Postby **BensonTCwatcher** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:44 pm

Last NHC plot put the motion at 300. What it looks like may be different fron what it is. All large TC's do loop de loops related to eyewall movement.

Anonymous · #36 Postby **Anonymous** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:45 pm

And you, das, are A#1 in that book. Isn't that ironic?

I have been saying between Pensacola and Panama City since Monday. So buzz off!

Agua · #37 Postby **Agua** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:45 pm

das8929 wrote:I sense alot of -removed- going on.

Dude, the sooner it turns, the further east from me it goes. I'd be the last person on this board to wish a storm to landfall near them.

#38 Postby **charleston_hugo_veteran** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:46 pm

AQUA:

You really know how to start a good post!... :lol:

Website · #39 Postby **Brent** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:47 pm

Once it turns completely, I think we'll know with high certainty where it will hit.

AL Chili Pepper · #40 Postby **AL Chili Pepper** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:50 pm

das8929 wrote:I sense alot of -removed- going on.

Yeah, me too. :roll:

Show me a NW turn, and I'll be the first to jump on the bandwagon.

Gradual turn beginning?

Who is online