Ivan Advisories

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: I noticed in 5:00 discussion no more talk of shear

#6541 Postby otowntiger » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:28 pm

B-Bear wrote:
otowntiger wrote:IN the NHC 5:00 discussion there was no talk of shear in the gulf like they've mentioned in the 5-6 previous advisories. Now they mention something very interesting, upwelling. That has never been talked about before now. I find it very interesting that suddenly there is no shear, but the water temps are now the issue. All along I've understood that upwelling would only occur where the storm sat for a long time and mixed up the deeper, cooler waters. I understand the SST's in the Gulf is a non issue, i.e. they are plenty warm. Anybody have any thoughts on that?


Here's how I understand it.

Upwelling will only occur if a hurricane is either stalled or moving at such a slow rate of speed that it allows water to pile up in front of it. Ivan is forecast to do neither of these things. Regarding the SSTs, I learned there are actually 2 factors--the SSTs and the heat content. SSTs are a measure of the surface temperature of the water, and the hurricane will build from that heat. The "heat content" is measure of the depth of the heat in the water. So with a high heat content, a hurricane might be more likely to maintain its intensity even with upwelling, since the water being churned up would likewise be warm. In the GOM there are very high SSTs, but the heat content is not generally that high. So if upwelling occurs, it might indeed affect Ivan's intensity. But that would only become a factor if he stalled or was moving very slow, and he's forecast to do neither.

I tend to agree with the previous poster's assessment. There is a monster hurricane about to emerge into the GOM and there are no predominant weather systems to definitively steer him. So the NHC sees that they have an out-of-control scenario on their hands and they are simply trying to keep people from panicking.


Thanks for the reply. I understand the upwelling process. I didn't know there were two measures of temperature, related to the depth. I know that Ivan is not predicted to slow that muc or stall and that is why I was surprised to see them mention upwelling. It not a factor for a storm that is forecast to be moving at least 10mph. What I am questioning now is what happened to the shear? Did they just forget to mention it or is it no longer forecasted? On the surface it would almost appear that they are just trying to come up with reasons for it to weaken. I don't think that is true, but I could see how it may look that way.
0 likes   

IndianaWxOnline
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 36
Age: 38
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: Eastern Indiana
Contact:

#6542 Postby IndianaWxOnline » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:29 pm

The TPC tries to change their forecast gradually so it does not alarm people, or so the drastic change in forecast does not make people like in florida think that they are totally clear and safe. I do think they need to start shifting it more west than what they have been. I would honestly say the main target now is from the texas/la line to the al/florida line.
0 likes   

hla97
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Belle Chasse, Louisiana
Contact:

Storm

#6543 Postby hla97 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:29 pm

I hope so, They never ever pay attention to us when a storm hits. Just like camielle. It was all about Biloxi, nothing about new orleans ( according to those who lived through it)
0 likes   

logybogy

What tracks of Ivan devastate/save New Orleans?

#6544 Postby logybogy » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:30 pm

Assuming Ivan stays as a Cat 4/5, what will New Orleans get in the way of damage/flooding, if Ivan tracks towards Bolixi, Mississippi, or 20-30 miles east of New Orleans, between Bolixi and NO.

What about if landfall is west of New Orleans?

Does Ivan have to hit "just right" and be a "direct hit" for New Orleans to get demolished (very unlikely) or can New Orleans get a lot of damage even if Ivan approaches its vicinity within 50-100 miles east or west, becoming more probable with time....
0 likes   

LSUChamps0002
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 11:00 pm
Location: Metairie, LA

Larger Eye?

#6545 Postby LSUChamps0002 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:31 pm

Question for those more informed on this subject than myself:

Ivan seems, to me, to be forming a rather large eye, I suppose replacing what were the concentric eyes with just the large outer of the two.

Of course, I could have no idea what I am talking about, but...

What are the consequences of this - further strengthening?

Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
0 likes   

Stormchaser16
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1013
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:25 pm
Location: NW Jersey
Contact:

#6546 Postby Stormchaser16 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:31 pm

Well lets think......

If ivan hits NO it will be devestation, now lets say, if ivan doesnt hit NO it wont be so bad i assume
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#6547 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:32 pm

WOrst case is a track from the se and ese of NO. THis won't happen in this case. Obviously...the best track is east of them.
0 likes   

Guest

#6548 Postby Guest » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:32 pm

A hurricane isn't a point. Thats all I know.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#6549 Postby x-y-no » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:32 pm

Yeah, it looks like the inner eyewall has collapsed and the outer eyewall is taking over.

Looks massive. :eek:
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#6550 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:33 pm

The inner eyewall has hung on for a long time...but is almost gone. The outer eyewall is becoming predominate and this means the pressure should be on its way down in another couple of hours.
0 likes   

Stormchaser16
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1013
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:25 pm
Location: NW Jersey
Contact:

#6551 Postby Stormchaser16 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:33 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html

LOL PLEASE dont tell me you think the area in the circle of red is going to be the eye...... please please please
0 likes   

marc21688
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:54 pm
Contact:

#6552 Postby marc21688 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:34 pm

Air Force what are your opinions on where this hurricane is heading and the intensity?
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

#6553 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:35 pm

We would want the storm at least 50 miles to our east or 100 miles to our west.
0 likes   

lookout
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 8:59 am

#6554 Postby lookout » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:35 pm

TSmith274 wrote:I see nothing wrong with discussing New Orleans as a possible target. If anything, it'll get people around here to start paying attention. Too early to start talking about New Orleans, you say? Just read this quote from the article posted in this thread earlier....
"Between 25,000 and 100,000 people would die, said John Clizbe, national vice president for disaster services with the American Red Cross."

In my book, we SHOULD be talking about New Orleans. It might save lives.



i'll just say this and leave it alone and all of you can go ahead and talk new orleans all though its very likely not going to happen. if there was any real chance of it coming to new orleans, dont you think the NHC would be all over it? think about it...
0 likes   

marc21688
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:54 pm
Contact:

#6555 Postby marc21688 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:35 pm

LOL that would be the biggest eye in history then..
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#6556 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:35 pm

Stormchaser16 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-ir4-loop.html

LOL PLEASE dont tell me you think the area in the circle of red is going to be the eye...... please please please


Yep...that is our new eyewall on its way in.
0 likes   

LowMug

#6557 Postby LowMug » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:35 pm

Air Force Met wrote:The inner eyewall has hung on for a long time...but is almost gone. The outer eyewall is becoming predominate and this means the pressure should be on its way down in another couple of hours.


Agreed...as usual...

The eyewall, from the latest floater image, appears that it may end up being the largest in diameter of Ivan to this point...optimism is rapidly decreasing
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: Larger Eye?

#6558 Postby skysummit » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:36 pm

LSUChamps0002 wrote:Question for those more informed on this subject than myself:

Ivan seems, to me, to be forming a rather large eye, I suppose replacing what were the concentric eyes with just the large outer of the two.

Of course, I could have no idea what I am talking about, but...

What are the consequences of this - further strengthening?

Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.


To me it looks like the outer eye wall is starting to take over. Look at the northern CDO....extremely cold cloudtops.

By the way.....GREAT screename LSU!
0 likes   

calidoug
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:13 pm

#6559 Postby calidoug » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:36 pm

Yes, it will take over, but then contract.
0 likes   

Stormchaser16
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1013
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:25 pm
Location: NW Jersey
Contact:

#6560 Postby Stormchaser16 » Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:36 pm

Well i know thats the eyewall, but the way this topic is worded, it seems the person thinks that whole area is going to become the eye
0 likes   


Return to “2004”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests