This is a graphic for today through Sunday.
They are forcasting 68 feet assuming 85mph
winds... the official NHC is forcasting 115+
for this area.
The bouy of referance is 64 mile south of Mobile Bay.
http://buoy.ocens.net/wxnav.jsp?region= ... -5&units=e
this graph is subject to change...
68 foot seas forcast for Thursday AL/MS coast
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
c5Camille
68 foot seas forcast for Thursday AL/MS coast
Last edited by c5Camille on Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- USCG_Hurricane_Watcher
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 268
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:08 am
- Location: Youngsville, LA & Apra Harbor, Guam
- Contact:
Good call jwelch...seas are 68 ft; not trying to downplay it AT ALL, but you wave height is also measured from trough to crest vertically, not sea level to crest. On top of that, because of the shallow nature of some parts of the gulf, most of that will lose it's energy as it pushes inshore and the shelf breaks it up. The buoy everyone's referencing is pretty far offshore. Wave height is a function of duration, water depth, fetch and wind speed...I'm still curious to see what the tide is going to be at landfall.
It definitely going to be rough, no two ways about it...unless you're a qualified surfman who happens to own your own motor lifeboat, you shouldn't be logging any underway time for the next three days.
It definitely going to be rough, no two ways about it...unless you're a qualified surfman who happens to own your own motor lifeboat, you shouldn't be logging any underway time for the next three days.
0 likes
The wave models do a terrible job once the waves are over 20 feet. They had 70 foot seas off the East Coast in Fabian last year when 25 - 30 was about it.. Reasons:
1) The wave models don't account for shoaling (depth-limited breaking) Remember, in 40 feet off water, the theoretical maximum possible wave height is about 30 feet. Thats 10 - 50 miles miles off the central hguulf coast
2) The wave models don't account for the muddy bottom dampening. It has a huge effect limiting nearshore wave heights in AL, Miss, LA areas.
3) The models can't handle wind speeds above about 50 mph well and simply extrapolate which overestimates wave height.
1) The wave models don't account for shoaling (depth-limited breaking) Remember, in 40 feet off water, the theoretical maximum possible wave height is about 30 feet. Thats 10 - 50 miles miles off the central hguulf coast
2) The wave models don't account for the muddy bottom dampening. It has a huge effect limiting nearshore wave heights in AL, Miss, LA areas.
3) The models can't handle wind speeds above about 50 mph well and simply extrapolate which overestimates wave height.
0 likes
-
c5Camille
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost and 142 guests


