Tom Terry WFTV says ...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Tom Terry WFTV says ...
"forget the GFDL"
"We're gonna keep an eye on the UKMET from now on.
and the BAMD did well only in short term"
"We're gonna keep an eye on the UKMET from now on.
and the BAMD did well only in short term"
0 likes
-
ColdFront77
-
ColdFront77
We need Tom Terry in ATLANTA. We don't seem to have anyone up here near as good as he is.
My parents are in Volusia County. I followed Tom's Frances and Jeanne coverage online--start to finish both times. I like his style.
If ever Orlando is tired of Tom...send him on up here to ATL. Our Mets could use a mentor like Tom.
My parents are in Volusia County. I followed Tom's Frances and Jeanne coverage online--start to finish both times. I like his style.
If ever Orlando is tired of Tom...send him on up here to ATL. Our Mets could use a mentor like Tom.
0 likes
tronbunny wrote:funny JenyEliza,
Tom has a new cohort...
I think his name is Arch Kennedy and he's from Atlanta (wsbtv)!
Yep. Arch Kennedy, I remember him (he's pretty good--but never had a chance to shine in ATL). Kind of hard to do that in Glen Burns and Karen Minton's shadows. I bet he's looking forward to being away from Karen Minton (WSBTV). She really gets on my last nerve.
I think WFTV and WSBTV are owned by the same company. Could be how they pinched Arch from a major market.
Still....the offer stands. Anytime ya'll are ready to send Tom packing...send him to US.
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
-
ColdFront77
-
rbaker
-
Derek Ortt
rbaker wrote:actually thought the nogaps did pretty well with Jeanne. The GFS and GFDL have been lousy this year, with the strenght of the ridge on the last several storms.
Mythology. At 120 hours the GFS was the top global model overall for both Frances and Ivan, for example.
There's a great deal of knee-jerk unthinking GFS bashing that often obscures the reality when objective track error numbers are examined.
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
Derek Ortt wrote:please show me the verification for the GFS being the best global model for Ivan.
GFS had Ivan missing Florida to the east. It was farther to the right than myself and Mussolini combined.
If GFS was the best model, it was because the other models were off with track, not heading
There was a lot of Ivan track prior to when it entered the GOM. The GFS ended up with the lowest OVERALL track error because for the first 2/3rds of the storm or so it was much further south than the other globals, and thus ended up with a lower 120 hour track error (this is calculated with Stormtrakker) than the NOGAPS, CMC, UKMET, for the entire storm.
Because it's run every 6 hours (well, NOGAPS is too, but few people look at the 6Z and 18Z runs) psychologically, error in the GFS is overemphasized relative to the other globals.
It's certainly not perfect, and it unfortunately seems to be prone to its largest error at about 2-3 days from US landfall (the critical time). But it's not the egregiously worthless model it's portrayed to be. The 4 runs a day make it twice as prone to screwy runs, and when it does have a bad track, the 4 times a day runs make it seem "twice" as wrong.
0 likes

