more shear

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
rbaker

more shear

#1 Postby rbaker » Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:53 pm

as I write this, the center is becoming more exposed again, with the thunderstorms being sheared out again to the ne. Recon might have been in there at the right time at the right place for the last vortex msg. Believe it will stay a td now.
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

Re: more shear

#2 Postby TS Zack » Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:56 pm

A Tropical Storm doesn't need to have a center under the convection/ Look at Allison, did she have a an exposed center?

Yes
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148503
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#3 Postby cycloneye » Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Image

The center is semiexposed as it shows at the visble pic.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

rbaker

#4 Postby rbaker » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:02 pm

take a look at the geostationary sat pic and you will see its even more exposed since that latest 1915z shot.
Its very questionable on whether it will hold ts status after being downgraded at 11am to a td. I don't believe they will jump back and forth between a td and ts just because one hr it starts to go and the next hr it doesn't. Its going to need more consistansy than that.
Having said that they did find a pressure of 997mb which does support a ts for sure.
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#5 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:03 pm

Every single time someone says something like this, I point them to one storm:

Hurricane Earl (Category 2 100 MPH, FL 102 KT (115 MPH))

Don't underestimate storms.
0 likes   

rbaker

#6 Postby rbaker » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:09 pm

as politicians say, this ain't no earl. Its been osalating back and forth between a td and ts. If you took the same plane out there 2 hrs from now, after the center becomes exposed again you will find that the pressure has gone back up again.
Im not underestimating a weak ts or td, the shear is there and has been for its life cycle.
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#7 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:14 pm

Didn't say it was, rbaker. I'm pointing out that sheared systems can be easily underestimated.

The trend is there......as long as it can keep strong thunderstorms just to the east of the center...it can strengthen steadily especially since baroclinicity increases towards the coast.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#8 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:29 pm

this is NOT a tropical cyclone.

the system does not have to have the center directly under the convection to intensify. it will easily maintain itself while exposed and then briefly rapidly intensify (about 2-3 hours) once the center mvoes back under the convection, which may occur once more before landfall
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#9 Postby dhweather » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:32 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:this is NOT a tropical cyclone.

the system does not have to have the center directly under the convection to intensify. it will easily maintain itself while exposed and then briefly rapidly intensify (about 2-3 hours) once the center mvoes back under the convection, which may occur once more before landfall


Aw Derek, come on man, don't take the fun out of Ivan III !!! :lol:
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#10 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:33 pm

Derek this is a tropical cyclone. If it weren't, it wouldn't be called Tropical Storm Matthew...

Maybe you meant to say something else there...
0 likes   

rbaker

#11 Postby rbaker » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:33 pm

well doc, if what you say is true, this is not a true tropical storm, and yes I know the arguement that not all ts or canes are not symetric.

Have you seen any wind levels of tropical storm force at ground level or buoys? Recon reported 41 kts at flt level, which is below ts status at surface. Your right about one thing , the trend is there and has been about the system getting sheared. And if it has a baroclinic feature maybe we shouldn't be calling this a true ts. Of course its not our call.

As Derek Ortt put it its the oddest looking td or ts he has ever seen from inception, and I agree except for maybe last night.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#12 Postby dhweather » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:35 pm

I'm not gonna dis Derek in any way.

The system may or may not be purely tropical.
It might just be hybrid.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#13 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:45 pm

DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:Derek this is a tropical cyclone. If it weren't, it wouldn't be called Tropical Storm Matthew...

Maybe you meant to say something else there...


I think what he is saying is this: This system is not deepening tropically...it is deepening mostly due to baroclinic processes. If it wasn't for that...this system would be nothing.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#14 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:49 pm

thats what I have been saying. This si deepening through the quasi-geostrophic theory principles, which are nothing at all like those which givern the typical tropical cyclone deepening dynamics
0 likes   

ColdFront77

#15 Postby ColdFront77 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:51 pm

That's fine. Development nonetheless is of interest to the weather enthusiast.
0 likes   

rbaker

#16 Postby rbaker » Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:58 pm

Matthew is doing the same thing as last night about this time. Convection is warming and getting a little further from the center. Also noticing in back of Matthew a huge jet stream type feature with subtropical moisture coming in from s tx and mexico, which could just obliterate whats left of the exposed center.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#17 Postby rtd2 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:18 pm

"Derek this is a tropical cyclone. If it weren't, it wouldn't be called Tropical Storm Matthew...

Maybe you meant to say something else there..."





wrong...as I said last night-This system is EXTRATROPICAL or a HYBRID system much like allison....a big rainmaker! but no strengthning past 50mph IMHO!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 279 guests