FTC files lawsuit against spyware manufacturer

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

FTC files lawsuit against spyware manufacturer

#1 Postby stormie_skies » Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:41 pm

'Bout damn time, too! :x

The Federal Trade Commission formally announced yesterday its first assault against spyware - bits of computer code that surreptitiously install themselves on the computers of Internet users to track their activities, push them to Web sites, barrage them with advertisements, and otherwise wreak havoc with their machines.

The commission filed a lawsuit in a federal court in New Hampshire last week against Sanford Wallace, the owner of Seismic Entertainment Productions and Smartbot.net, contending that Mr. Wallace and his companies had violated federal law, which prohibits "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce."

"This may be our first case," said Lydia Parnes, the acting director of the commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection, at a news conference in Washington yesterday. "But it won't be our last."

The suit, which seeks an injunction against Mr. Wallace's companies, claims they exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser - the most widely used browser - to seize varying amounts of control over users' computers. It also charges that the spyware deployed by the two companies changed users' home pages, installed advertising and software programs on the users' computers, and caused a deluge of pop-up windows to appear on computer screens - without the users' consent. In some instances, the complaint says the codes caused computers to "malfunction, slow down, crash or cease working properly."

"I understand what the F.T.C. is trying to do," Mr. Wallace said in a telephone interview, "but we believe that what we're doing is legal."



http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/13/technology/13spy.html
0 likes   

chadtm80

#2 Postby chadtm80 » Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:45 pm

Yep I saw that on the news last night.. And I agree.. About DERN time.. They need to get MUCH MUCH tougher on this crap.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#3 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:06 pm

Now here's something we'll probably all agree on. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#4 Postby Stephanie » Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:30 pm

Thanks for passing that along! I didn't see that on the news, but like Chad said - "it's about DERN time". :lol: :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#5 Postby Lindaloo » Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:32 pm

Awesome!! This is a step in the right direction.
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#6 Postby AussieMark » Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:48 pm

Take the company to the cleaners so send out a strong message that this stuff won't be tolerated no longer.
0 likes   

Deenac813
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:16 pm
Location: Hollywood, Florida

#7 Postby Deenac813 » Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:50 pm

I am so happy about this. I fight this all the time!
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#8 Postby coriolis » Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:39 am

As Tony the Tiger woud say - GRRRRREEEEEAAAAT
0 likes   
This space for rent.

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#9 Postby Stormsfury » Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:32 am

Wallace "believes what he is doing is legal?"??? .... What kind of cockamimi BS is that? ...

Time to grab the hammer and put the serious smackdown on his a$$...

SF
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#10 Postby stormie_skies » Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:36 am

Im with you there, SF! :clap:
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#11 Postby Sanibel » Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:03 pm

Totally agree SF. A legal weasel who doesn't mind crashing my computer and making my life miserable "because it is legal."

The government should also be sued for taking so long...
0 likes   

User avatar
tronbunny
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Central FL

#12 Postby tronbunny » Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:31 pm

I'm not into much government regulation, but...
we pay for access, we shouldn't have to be subjected to that crap.
SOMEONE ought to sue them as they are not just pursuing their own business but they are being overly intrusive in the process. Right to privacy and all.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#13 Postby Stormsfury » Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:33 pm

Sanibel wrote:Totally agree SF. A legal weasel who doesn't mind crashing my computer and making my life miserable "because it is legal."

The government should also be sued for taking so long...


They (the government) were more worried about what and what I can't listen to on the radio (FCC) ... can't really sue the government, but it's not a bad idea ...

tronbunny wrote:I'm not into much government regulation, but...
we pay for access, we shouldn't have to be subjected to that crap.
SOMEONE ought to sue them as they are not just pursuing their own business but they are being overly intrusive in the process. Right to privacy and all.


agreed, tronbunny ... I'm a poster child for less government regulation, but this is one big exception to that rule ... spyware and adware is a DIRECT violation of my privacy which allows this internet peeping tom to track sites that we all access and targets ads and crap like that ... first of all, I deal with enough friggin' advertisements on TV, and radio ... and even at the movie theater ... I DON'T want them on my PC ... I DON'T like someone knowing all the sites that I frequent, not like it's really a big issue b/c they are mostly related to weather and music, anyway ...

I also hate to say this, but IMHO, I wouldn't mind seeing public stonings or something along the lines for spyware/adware creators, internet hackers who create viruses that screw our PC's up, etc ...

SF
0 likes   

User avatar
tronbunny
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Central FL

#14 Postby tronbunny » Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:32 pm

I can get loudly opinionated when it comes to privacy and intrusion into my computer, also.
I only do weather and research and business, but I also pay bills and buy stuff.
hackers and virus writers and spyware and spammers...all creeps to the max and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and if there isn't strong punishment make the durn law!
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests