BREAKING NEWS -- NOOOOOOOO!!!

yoda · #21 Postby **yoda** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 4:19 pm

If a mistrial is declared, it is up to the prosecution to choose whether or not to retry the case.

Website · #22 Postby **Brent** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 5:17 pm

MSNBC and Court TV reporting Juror Number 7 has been replaced.

#23 Postby **Aslkahuna** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:09 pm

Well, UT is different from CA-not likely to see the resurrection of the OJ Jury as Jay Leno puts it in that state. California seems to have this hangup of not getting good juries in high profile cases. Incidentally, the US doesn't have a JUSTICE system-it's a LEGAL system-if you want Justice go to a Whorehouse, if you want to get screwed-go to Court.

Steve

therock1811 · #24 Postby **therock1811** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:17 pm

Brent wrote:MSNBC and Court TV reporting Juror Number 7 has been replaced.

And not only that, BUT the past 32 hours deliberations? All for NOTHING...the judge basically threw them out!

Website · #25 Postby **Brent** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:38 pm

therock1811 wrote:
Brent wrote:MSNBC and Court TV reporting Juror Number 7 has been replaced.

And not only that, BUT the past 32 hours deliberations? All for NOTHING...the judge basically threw them out!

Hope the journalists like it in Redwood City. :lol:

yoda · #26 Postby **yoda** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:07 pm

therock1811 wrote:
Brent wrote:MSNBC and Court TV reporting Juror Number 7 has been replaced.

And not only that, BUT the past 32 hours deliberations? All for NOTHING...the judge basically threw them out!

Really? That would be interesting. However, the alternative juror would already know the case and be able to step in. I don't think he threw out the past 32 hours of delib.

therock1811 · #27 Postby **therock1811** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:13 pm

Oh yes he did.

Judge Alfred Delucchi said juror No. 7 had been taken off the case and replaced by Alternate No. 1.

He then instructed the panel to disregard the past 32 hours of deliberations and start from scratch.

That's from the CourtTV story on this situation here: http://www.courttv.com/trials/peterson/110904_pm_ctv.html

yoda · #28 Postby **yoda** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:17 pm

therock1811 wrote:Oh yes he did.
Judge Alfred Delucchi said juror No. 7 had been taken off the case and replaced by Alternate No. 1.

He then instructed the panel to disregard the past 32 hours of deliberations and start from scratch.

That's from the CourtTV story on this situation here: http://www.courttv.com/trials/peterson/110904_pm_ctv.html

Wow. Thanks for the clarification and link. Most interesting stuff here, we may have some groundwork for appeals by either side.

#29 Postby **bfez1** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:37 pm

If Scott is not found guilty I will need to be sedated.
UGHHH!!!

Website · #30 Postby **Brent** » Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:49 pm

This is crap. :grr:

BREAKING NEWS -- NOOOOOOOO!!!

Who is online