Peterson Defense Seeks New Jury for Penalty Phase

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

Peterson Defense Seeks New Jury for Penalty Phase

#1 Postby yoda » Thu Nov 18, 2004 3:28 am

Well, well, well. Interesting turn of events, but this is one motion that I know will be DENIED. But this is all just a set up, folks. Motions filed by both attorneys can be used in appeals to subject their view...

-----------------------------------------

Wednesday, November 17, 2004
Associated Press

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos (search) filed the motion Wednesday in San Mateo County Superior Court. Specific details will not be made public until after Judge Alfred A. Delucchi reviews the file Monday morning before the scheduled start of the penalty phase.

The 32-year-old former fertilizer salesman was convicted Friday on one count of first-degree murder in the death of Laci Peterson (search) and one count of second-degree murder for the killing of the fetus.

Jurors must decide whether to sentence Peterson to life in prison or death. The penalty phase is expected to last about four days.

Beyond the change in venue, Geragos is seeking to empanel an entirely new jury to decide Peterson's fate.

In February, Geragos also sought to have two juries seated for the trial, one for the guilt phase and one for the penalty phase.


At the time, he contended that "the vast adverse publicity, the abnormally high prejudging of guilt and the strong statistical showings that a death-qualified jury tilts in the favor of the prosecution" supported his request.

The judge denied that motion and let the trial move forward with just one jury.

Delucchi has ordered that all filings in the case remain sealed until he has had a chance to review them. But Geragos' motion was not surprising, a law professor said.

"I think the basis for the change of venue is that they simply didn't move the trial far enough away in the first place," said Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson.

The case was moved from Modesto after a judge there found Peterson couldn't get a fair trial in the couple's hometown. Redwood City, where the five-month trial was eventually held, is 90 miles away.

Levenson also noted the cheering crowd of more than 1,000 gathered outside the courthouse when the guilty verdict was read.

"His [Geragos'] argument would be that it's impossible to have a jury that isn't personally and emotionally involved in this penalty phase," Levenson said.

Jurors were sequestered during deliberations but were sent home pending the start of the penalty phase. They will be sequestered again as they determine Peterson's fate.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,138892,00.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

#2 Postby Cookiely » Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:53 am

Can you just imagine the reaction of the jury to being replaced in the penalty phase after going through what they have for five months. Geragos is so funny. He wants a new jury that hasn't seen the crime photos and autopsy reports. When it comes to babies and children, or old people or people like Laci who are unable to defend themselves, I'm all for the death penalty.
0 likes   

User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

#3 Postby alicia-w » Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:52 am

okay Geragos, you've got the guy's money. You didnt defend him worth a crap. Just sit there quietly, go through the motions and let the guy go to prison or whatever. But quite wasting taxpayers' money by delaying the inevitable with all these dumb motions.....
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests