Dr. William Gray 2005 Forecast=11/6/3
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- HURAKAN
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
Dr. William Gray 2005 Forecast=11/6/3
2005 Forecast:
11 TS
6 H
3 MH
For a deeper information visit:
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/dec2004/
11 TS
6 H
3 MH
For a deeper information visit:
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/dec2004/
0 likes
-
Anonymous
We foresee a slightly above-average hurricane season for the Atlantic basin in 2005. Also, an above-average probability of U.S. major hurricane landfall is anticipated. We do not, however, expect anything close to the U.S. landfalling hurricane activity of 2004.
Boring
Still plenty of time for this to change though.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148503
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
For me the april update is the most important one as he will have much more data to analize by then than the December one but I agree and in fact almost is with my preliminary forecast on a less active season than the 2004 one in terms of less major canes and less activity in general but above the average of 9.6 named storms.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Dr. William Gray 2005 Forecast=11/6/3
HURAKAN,
At this point in time, I strongly agree with Dr. Gray's preliminary ideas. Given my early assumptions, my ideas would be extremely close.
General Assumptions:
• MEI < +0.50 (El Niño is gone and at least neutral conditions prevail during the hurricane season)
• QBO averages < -6 for the hurricane season (this is highly likely if the QBO switches to negative by February/March)
There were 15 seasons that met such criteria. The averages for those seasons:
• Named Storms: 11.1
• Hurricanes: 6.3
• Major Hurricanes: 2.6
Rounding brings these figures to Dr. Gray's totals!
Refined Assumptions:
• Same as above with two limitations: QBO would not average -20 or below; MEI would not average -1.00 or below
There were 10 seasons that met such criteria. The averages for those seasons:
• Named Storms: 10.6
• Hurricanes: 6.2
• Major Hurricanes: 2.4 (note: other indices seem somewhat more bullish on this matter but some of them are more difficult for me to reasonably predict so far in advance)
FWIW, only 4 of those 10 seasons saw a major hurricane make U.S. landfall. Consequently, from this vantage point, the probability of a major hurricane making landfall seems signficantly lower than what was suggested by the 2004 season's analogs (which correctly pointed to a high probability of one or more such storms making U.S. landfall).
Therefore, at this point in time, my initial ideas for the 2005 hurricane season would be 11 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 2 major hurricanes. Needless to say, it is too soon to place much confidence in such ideas. Later data will be needed to develop strong analogs for the 2005 season.
At this point in time, I strongly agree with Dr. Gray's preliminary ideas. Given my early assumptions, my ideas would be extremely close.
General Assumptions:
• MEI < +0.50 (El Niño is gone and at least neutral conditions prevail during the hurricane season)
• QBO averages < -6 for the hurricane season (this is highly likely if the QBO switches to negative by February/March)
There were 15 seasons that met such criteria. The averages for those seasons:
• Named Storms: 11.1
• Hurricanes: 6.3
• Major Hurricanes: 2.6
Rounding brings these figures to Dr. Gray's totals!
Refined Assumptions:
• Same as above with two limitations: QBO would not average -20 or below; MEI would not average -1.00 or below
There were 10 seasons that met such criteria. The averages for those seasons:
• Named Storms: 10.6
• Hurricanes: 6.2
• Major Hurricanes: 2.4 (note: other indices seem somewhat more bullish on this matter but some of them are more difficult for me to reasonably predict so far in advance)
FWIW, only 4 of those 10 seasons saw a major hurricane make U.S. landfall. Consequently, from this vantage point, the probability of a major hurricane making landfall seems signficantly lower than what was suggested by the 2004 season's analogs (which correctly pointed to a high probability of one or more such storms making U.S. landfall).
Therefore, at this point in time, my initial ideas for the 2005 hurricane season would be 11 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 2 major hurricanes. Needless to say, it is too soon to place much confidence in such ideas. Later data will be needed to develop strong analogs for the 2005 season.
0 likes
-
Josephine96
- Andrew92
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3247
- Age: 41
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Jekyhe32210 wrote:We foresee a slightly above-average hurricane season for the Atlantic basin in 2005. Also, an above-average probability of U.S. major hurricane landfall is anticipated. We do not, however, expect anything close to the U.S. landfalling hurricane activity of 2004.
Boring![]()
Still plenty of time for this to change though.
Yeah, it may be boring. But I'll take a "boring" hurricane season over a major-hurricane-landfall-active hurricane season like this year has been. If you only like the "more interesting" season when major hurricanes hit the United States, kill hundreds of people (or in the case of Haiti, thousands) and cause over $40 billion in damage, then how about you see if you can pay for all of that damage. Do you have $40 billion?
God bless Florida, and may they not get hit by any hurricanes next year.
Lastly, my numbers for 2005 are 13/7/3.
-Andrew92
0 likes
-
Scorpion
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148503
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Scorpion wrote:Just one major south of Palm Beach and I guarantee you the season will not be boring by any means.
I dont understand why do you want a major cane making landfall near your area?
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
tronbunny wrote:Hmmmmmm 50:50 chances for Florida landfall.
I would've felt comfortable saying THAT.
Oh well.
I'll wait until april.
I don't see a 50-50 chance for a Florida landfall. Is there a part of Dr. Gray's forecast where he issues state-by state forecasts? I do see a Florida to Maine forecast of a 57% chance for a TS or Cat 1/2 hurricane hit, and a 49% chance of a Cat 3-5 hit from Florida to Maine, but nothing that just mentions Florida.
Florida plus East Coast (5-11) 57% (51) 57% (45) 49% (31) 79% (62) 91% (81)
That said, I do think that Florida will be under the gun again in 2005. Most likely not as many as this year, but the steering patterns may be similar in 2005. And this time the "Frances", "Jeanne", or "Ivan" may not be in a weakening phase at landfall. Only Charley wasn't weakening at landfall, and it's field was quite tiny. However, Charley's tiny area of Cat 3-4 winds produced $14 billion in damage. Just goes to show you that when winds top 100 mph that structural failure of houses/buildings can result in much more dollar damage. Neither Jeanne or Frances produced widespread 100+ mph winds.
0 likes
-
Scorpion
I mean that most people think of boring seasons as few major hurricanes. Example is 1992. That season is a season that will go into the historybooks. So if 2005 is a "boring season" it wouldnt be if a major hit south of Palm Beach County(Floridas most populated and developed area) because of the amount of damage.
0 likes
Re: Dr. William Gray 2005 Forecast=11/6/3
HURAKAN wrote:2005 Forecast:
11 TS
6 H
3 MH
For a deeper information visit:
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/dec2004/
I saw that on The Weather Channel this morning.
0 likes
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
cycloneye wrote:Scorpion wrote:Just one major south of Palm Beach and I guarantee you the season will not be boring by any means.
I dont understand why do you want a major cane making landfall near your area?
I don't either. Frances and Jeanne hit right where he lives IN THE EXACT SAME SPOT.
0 likes
#neversummer
- CharleySurvivor
- Category 1

- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL formerly Port Charlotte FL
-
HurricaneBill
- Category 5

- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 344 guests



