Weather Channel gals too blah??!.....

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Weather Channel gals too blah??!.....

#1 Postby dixiebreeze » Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:26 pm

January 7, 2005 --
A storm of controversy has engulfed The Weather Channel, after a 40-something former anchor accused network brass of washing her out of a high-ranking job to make way for a hot front of sexy young weatherwomen.

Marny Stanier Midkiff, 42, this week filed a lawsuit claiming she was booted in the fall of 2003 as part of a reputed "reorganization" of the storm channel, which she believes was really an excuse to get more young female weathercasters on the air.

Midkiff says that, in the months before she was let go, her boss allegedly spoke of female staffers as "matronly," "dowdy" and "nun-like" and asked that female on-air talent turn up the temperature on their look with more revealing "V-neck" shirts.

Midkiff and her attorney claim The Weather Channel also began hiring new young weathercasters starting in 2003 as part of this effort, and the then-41-year-old, who spent 16 years reporting on sun and rain for the network, was left out in the cold.

"She got tossed aside because The Weather Channel wanted a younger look," said Midkiff's attorney, Daniel Klein. "She was one of the top [meteorologists]. She was one of the best they had, but she didn't fit the image they had in mind."

He said hires such as weathercasters Alexandra Steele and Nicole Mitchell are among those who demonstrate this trend. Klein's office also provided a picture of what was called the "new look" of the channel, in which recently hired meteorologists wear hotter-looking low-cut blouses.

According to Midkiff's suit, filed in Atlanta federal court, the forecast looked sunny for the veteran meteorologist in early 2003 as she was promoted to be a high-level manager of the other on-air talent, in addition to her regular duties reading the weather on air.

But Midkiff claims her boss, programming chief Terry Connelly, was becoming convinced the older look of the staff was costing The Weather Channel viewers.

The network declined to comment on the allegations because of pending litigation. But Midkiff claims the first major step Connelly took was to hire an image consultant.

"Connelly openly expressed animosity toward older female [meteorologists]," the suit says. "He spoke freely of his goal to 'young up' The Weather Channel.

"At one point, Connelly announced, 'We're old and we can't be . . . Our ratings are going down.' "

The worst for Midkiff came in August of 2003 when Connelly held an "open forum" in which he said viewers thought the network's female weathercasters looked too old.
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#2 Postby dixiebreeze » Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:28 pm

I always thought Marty did a pretty good job and that the female TWC veterans were very good during 'Cane season.
0 likes   

User avatar
mikey mike
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Gulfport,MS

#3 Postby mikey mike » Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:15 pm

Older on air "personalities" is not the reason why TWC is losing viewers.The reason is just what this idiot producer think is wrong.I personally did not tune in to TWC to see the new "blonde of the month" but to get WEATHER information.You may notice I said "did" tune in.I no longer watch this dog and pony show calling itself a weather network.
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#4 Postby dixiebreeze » Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:41 pm

I agree with that, Mike. It seems that nowadays TWC has almost everything except weather. Oh for the good old days of John Hope and the weather gang of the 1980s.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#5 Postby MWatkins » Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:34 am

mikey mike wrote:Older on air "personalities" is not the reason why TWC is losing viewers.The reason is just what this idiot producer think is wrong.I personally did not tune in to TWC to see the new "blonde of the month" but to get WEATHER information.You may notice I said "did" tune in.I no longer watch this dog and pony show calling itself a weather network.


Actually...it is my belief that the net is filling more and more of the weather informaion void. For example...in the early 90's I used to keep the wx channel on 24/7 to see hour old satellite imagery because I couldn't get it otherwise...now I haven't even looked at it since Jeanne passed through here. Yet...I can look at any satellite loop from anywhere whenever I want...pull down models...observations in real time...and web cams...which is FAR more than the wx channel provides.

Putting younger ladies on the air is just a thinly disguised attempt to hang on to a predominantly (but not exclusively...I know) male audience. What's next...they have a reality show to choose the next on air personality?

They are losing market share to the net. They better adapt soon or they will continue to slide toward obscurity.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#6 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:41 am

I always liked Marny.

I started watching the Weather Channel back in 1990. I still watch it to see who is still on.

I still like watching Jeanetta Jones and Sheryl Lemke.

Jon Hope was my favorite male forecaster. Jeanetta is my favorite female forecaster.

Is Dennis Smith still on? I remember when he was reporting live on Hurricane Andrew from the eye or close to it.
0 likes   

hurricanefreak1988
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 869
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:13 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Contact:

Re: Weather Channel gals too blah??!.....

#7 Postby hurricanefreak1988 » Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:41 am

dixiebreeze wrote:He said hires such as weathercasters Alexandra Steele and Nicole Mitchell are among those who demonstrate this trend.

Image
Yeah, I'd think I'd agree.Image Image Image
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#8 Postby dixiebreeze » Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:48 pm

MWatkins wrote:
mikey mike wrote:Older on air "personalities" is not the reason why TWC is losing viewers.The reason is just what this idiot producer think is wrong.I personally did not tune in to TWC to see the new "blonde of the month" but to get WEATHER information.You may notice I said "did" tune in.I no longer watch this dog and pony show calling itself a weather network.


Actually...it is my belief that the net is filling more and more of the weather informaion void. For example...in the early 90's I used to keep the wx channel on 24/7 to see hour old satellite imagery because I couldn't get it otherwise...now I haven't even looked at it since Jeanne passed through here. Yet...I can look at any satellite loop from anywhere whenever I want...pull down models...observations in real time...and web cams...which is FAR more than the wx channel provides.

Putting younger ladies on the air is just a thinly disguised attempt to hang on to a predominantly (but not exclusively...I know) male audience. What's next...they have a reality show to choose the next on air personality?

They are losing market share to the net. They better adapt soon or they will continue to slide toward obscurity.

MW


Absolutely agree, Mike W. I used to always have TWC on, but not anymore. Far more useful info (and more up-to-date) on the Net. Plus, of course, we get to discuss what's happening.
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#9 Postby george_r_1961 » Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:07 pm

Marny was one of my favorites; after she was let go I rarely watch TWC anymore. The tropical update isnt the same without John Hope either :cry:
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#10 Postby weatherlover427 » Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:36 pm

george_r_1961 wrote:Marny was one of my favorites; after she was let go I rarely watch TWC anymore. The tropical update isnt the same without John Hope either :cry:


I agree 100%. It was a sad day when he passed on and in fact was the reason I joined their forums.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#11 Postby fci » Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:44 am

Totally agree that TWC has seen its better days mostly due to the Net.
It does seem that you get everything BUT the Weather.
Storm Stories, the same thing basically over and over again.
Now during Hurricane season here in So. FLa, I depended on Storm 2K for my latest info!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 598 guests