6.6 quake near Micronesia Islands at West Pac

Rainband · #21 Postby **Rainband** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:28 pm

Ivanova wrote:
Rainband wrote:
Are you for freaking real!!! The first quake caused the topography of the ocean floor to be changed thats why the sub ran aground. Your theory holds NO water and is insulting to me as an American

I tried to keep my discussion to my own topic..
but the moderator locked mine as a dup to this
topic... so I am posting here... if what I post
offends you, then don't read my posts !

*

I am a moderator too if you hadn't noticed. Your post offends more than me.

Ivanova · #22 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:32 pm

Rainband wrote:
I am a moderator too if you hadn't noticed.
Your post offends more than me.

Ohhh.. I see... so the posters
here must be careful not to
offend the moderators.. am I
understanding your message
correctly ??

:idea:

Lindaloo · #23 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:38 pm

Nothing to do with moderators Ivanova. Your assumptions offend. The doom and gloom and conspiracy theories are getting quite old.

Website · #24 Postby **Brent** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:39 pm

Lindaloo wrote:Nothing to do with moderators Ivanova. Your assumptions offend. The doom and gloom and conspiracy theories are getting quite old.

YES IT IS!!!

It's been bugging me for well over a week now but I've kept my mouth shut. :wink:

#25 Postby **streetsoldier** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 11:04 pm

Same here.

#26 Postby **Aslkahuna** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 11:21 pm

Considering the energy release in even a M=6.6 earthquake, there's nothing that we could "leave behind" that could cause one. Certainly not without it's explosion being detected by non US sensors which would trigger comment from other governments. Bottom line-Tectonic earthquakes can not be triggered by any technological means at our disposal.

Steve

Ivanova · #27 Postby **Ivanova** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:02 am

Aslkahuna wrote:
Bottom line-Tectonic earthquakes can not be triggered
by any technological means at our disposal.

Such technology would be similar to that invented by the
famous son of a Serbian Orthodox Priest

*

#28 Postby **vbhoutex** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:08 am

Ivanova wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:
Bottom line-Tectonic earthquakes can not be triggered
by any technological means at our disposal.

Such technology would be similar to that invented by the
famous son of a Serbian Orthodox Priest

*

Quit speaking in circles. Be specific as to what you are referring to.

Ivanova · #29 Postby **Ivanova** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:14 am

vbhoutex wrote:
Ivanova wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:
Bottom line-Tectonic earthquakes can not be triggered
by any technological means at our disposal.

Such technology would be similar to that invented by the
famous son of a Serbian Orthodox Priest

*

Quit speaking in circles. Be specific as to what you are referring to.

Nikola Tesla

Serbian-American son of a Serbian Orthodox Christian Priest.

"Tesla kept a diary of his experiments in the Colorado Springs lab where he spent nearly nine months. It consists of 500 pages of handwritten notes and nearly 200 drawings, recorded chronologically between June 1, 1899 and January 7, 1900, as the work occurred, containing explanations of his experiments. He was developing a system for wireless telegraphy, telephony and the transmission of power, experimented with high-voltage electricity and the possibility of wireless transmitting and distributing large amounts of electrical energy over long distances.

He also conceived a system for geophysical exploration--seismology--which he called telegeodynamics, based on his reciprocating mechanical oscillator patented in 1894, and explained that a long sequence of small explosions could be used to find ore and create earthquakes large enough to destroy the Earth. He did not experiment with this as he felt there would not be "a desirable outcome".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla

:idea:

#30 Postby **vbhoutex** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:33 am

He did not experiment with this as he felt there would not be "a desirable outcome".

'nuff said!!!

Ivanova · #31 Postby **Ivanova** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:43 am

vbhoutex wrote:
He did not experiment with this as he felt there would not be "a desirable outcome".

'nuff said!!!

But maybe others have 8-)

oops... I'm back on the subject
that got me in trouble here in the
first place :roll:

btw... did you read this part
of his biography at the link
I gave above:

"Immediately after Tesla's death became known,
the Federal Bureau of Investigation instructed the
Office of Alien Property to take possession of his
papers and property, despite his US citizenship.
All of his personal effects were seized on the advice
of presidential advisors. J. Edgar Hoover declared
the case "most secret", because of the nature of
Tesla's inventions and patents. Tesla's Serbian-Orthodox
family and the Yugoslav embassy struggled with
American authorities to gain these items after his death
due to the potential significance of some of his research."

:idea:

kevin · #32 Postby **kevin** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:20 am

Earthquakes large enough to destroy the earth. Pardon me, but unless he is talking about drawing down the moon into this planet, it cannot be done.

Website · #33 Postby **Brent** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:51 am

Ivanova... please go away with your stupid "theories". No one here believes them. :roll:

#34 Postby **vbhoutex** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:34 am

Brent wrote:Ivanova... please go away with your stupid "theories". No one here believes them.

Brent, Ivanova is allowed to post those inane theories here as long as it is done respectfully and without attacking others, whether we believe them or not. I don't!!

Tornado_Chaser2005 · #35 Postby **Tornado_Chaser2005** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:16 am

I just stumbled on this, and man this topic is heated. i can put my finger on it in the forum list, and just feel the heat off of this..Ok here is my views on this.

Ivan, you believe that a US nuclear sub may have caused that 9.0 Earthquake? I think you are watching WAYYYYYYY to much Superman the movie where as a Nuclear Bomb was set off along the San Andreas Fault line, causing an Earthquake.

Your theories can continue in here, but you will only get the same from everyone else..No one is going to believe you that other forces caused the Earthquake, or any other major earth disaster..I guess Mount Saint Helens is going to be caused by a deer slipping in the crater..The end result would be the mountain eating it up, and burping a loud belch, aka eruption.....

I will continue to watch this topic in laughing amuzement..Its better than Comedy Central, and a true waste of forum space.

TC

Ivanova · #36 Postby **Ivanova** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:35 pm

Like I said earlier... I like to consider all the possibilities...
what's wrong with that ??

And speaking of that... maybe another power... besides
the USA... caused the earthquake near Guam... big home
to the US military... and speaking of that... since reporters
love to cover the tsunami miracle survivor stories... why
was there no one reporting from Diego Garcia... after all,
everyone on the small Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia
survived the tsunami... even the political prisoners held there...
right ??

8-)

#37 Postby **vbhoutex** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 pm

Ivanova wrote:Like I said earlier... I like to consider all the possibilities...
what's wrong with that ??

And speaking of that... maybe another power... besides
the USA... caused the earthquake near Guam... big home
to the US military... and speaking of that... since reporters
love to cover the tsunami miracle survivor stories... why
was there no one reporting from Diego Garcia... after all,
everyone on the small Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia
survived the tsunami... even the political prisoners held there...
right ??

That question was answered elsewhere. It is a simple matter of depth of the ocean at the island and run up of the waves vs shallow depths other places hit. Debunk that now!!! :roll:

I'll give you one thing Ivanova, you sure can spark a discussion. Unfortunately the negative of the discussion is almost always directed at you since your "theories" are so ludicrous to most of us. Different strokes for different folks!!

Ivanova · #38 Postby **Ivanova** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:53 pm

vbhoutex wrote:

That question was answered elsewhere. It is a simple matter of depth of the ocean at the island and run up of the waves vs shallow depths other places hit. Debunk that now!!!

My point exactly... a HUGE US military base...
on a SMALL Indian Ocean island... survives
a GIANT tsunami directed towards it... and
no one from CNN reported FROM THE SCENE
to tell America about the miracle ??

8-)

Website · #39 Postby **Brent** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:54 pm

Ivanova wrote:
vbhoutex wrote:

That question was answered elsewhere. It is a simple matter of depth of the ocean at the island and run up of the waves vs shallow depths other places hit. Debunk that now!!!

My point exactly... a HUGE US military base...
on a SMALL Indian Ocean island... survives
a GIANT tsunami directed towards it... and
no one from CNN reported FROM IN SCENE
to report the miracle ??

WHY DON'T YOU READ???? :roll:

Ivanova · #40 Postby **Ivanova** » Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:59 pm

I should think Americans would be proud to know
God is on their side when He protected a US military
base on the small island of Diego Garcia... located in
the middle of the Indian Ocean... when all around it
was death and destruction !

So, why didn't at least FOX News *report from location*
to tell them about it ??

just asking...

8-)

6.6 quake near Micronesia Islands at West Pac

Who is online