check off of hat

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#21 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:06 pm

Amanzi wrote:Is my calender on the right page???? It is April..huh? :lol:


Yeah, someone awaken me from this dream. :eek:
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#22 Postby Hyperstorm » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:24 pm

Interestingly, SST's underneath the feature are slightly below normal for this time of year (right around 70*). This tells me that the system is being enhanced via baroclinicity at this time (ULL to the SW is helping).
0 likes   

Anonymous

#23 Postby Anonymous » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:27 pm

If it moves to the Southwest...waters will still be cold, but if it is developing over these waters now, even slightly warmer waters will help aid it.
0 likes   

krysof

#24 Postby krysof » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:33 pm

Cold? 70 degrees is warm, but this low can't develop into anything intresting. It has no chance of being a warm core. It would have to go straight south all the way to south florida. My prediction is that this is just a stalled low, cold core, no tropical support. If a subtropical storm were to develop, I would be impressed.
0 likes   

User avatar
vacanechaser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Portsmouth, Va
Contact:

#25 Postby vacanechaser » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:43 pm

krysof wrote:Cold? 70 degrees is warm, but this low can't develop into anything intresting. It has no chance of being a warm core. It would have to go straight south all the way to south florida. My prediction is that this is just a stalled low, cold core, no tropical support. If a subtropical storm were to develop, I would be impressed.



Not completely true... 2003, Ana formed over relativly cooler water than the 79 degree needed.. What you have here is a low forming in a warmer enviornment than to the north.. Think about what you said, not a warm core.......... It probably already is...to a degree, if there is anything at the surface... The air to the north is much colder than what is going on within the system. The processes taking place are releasing that heat near the center which is driving the temp up.... That temperature difference between the 70-76 degree water temps it is sitting over, and the process of the release of heat is much warmer than the air to the north... It is a "heat engin" that drives the tropical systems... If the center is warmer than the surrounding air, you have a warm core system which could allow this thing to thrive a bit... Same situation with Ana..

I am not saying this thing will develop into much, however the situation could allow for it to become the first named system if all the ducks are in a row..


Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team
0 likes   
Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team

Rainband

#26 Postby Rainband » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:46 pm

After Last year anything is possible :eek:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#27 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:50 pm

I've seen tropical cyclones develop and or intensify over SST's in the 50's, if the quasi-geostrophic forcing is sufficient (Michael in 2000 and Noel in 2001)

tomorrow will be the key. If this were august, I suspect we'd be seeing advisories written on this
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#28 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:52 pm

LET'S GET THIS PARTY STARTED! :D
0 likes   

krysof

#29 Postby krysof » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm

If this were to develop and get a name, many theories of late start to season would be completely crushed, then again I don't think this will develop into much, it is April 14th very early, even earlier than when Ana developed which is April 20th officially? I'm not sure. I can't wait to see this forum in action though.

I'll miss a lot though this summer. I won't be here, I'm going to France July 2nd until August 22nd.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#30 Postby MWatkins » Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm

Hyperstorm wrote:Interestingly, SST's underneath the feature are slightly below normal for this time of year (right around 70*). This tells me that the system is being enhanced via baroclinicity at this time (ULL to the SW is helping).


Bingo...instability touched off by the mid-level low...and being in the exit region of the upper jet.

12Z QSCAT and surface obs would suggest that there is an elongated area of low pressure down there, but notice that there is no SE winds...it's a good shear zone for sure...but it doesnt appear to be a circulation...we may get another pass here across the system pretty soon...but again...looks like a tight wind-shift in a highly sheared environment...with most of the t-storm activity coming from atmospheric instability in the mid-levels rather than surface forcing alone...

Also...water temps in the are are in the very low 70's...which would suggest that any development would be subtropical...and would have to happen over a period of days.

GFS guidance suggests the cutoff low will start to wind down as the dynamics lift out in another 24-36 hours:

Pretty tight col now:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_000s.gif

Opening up in a day:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_024s.gif

Starting to fill in 2:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_048s.gif

Hey we have something to talk about though...right?

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#31 Postby george_r_1961 » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:02 pm

Im impressed. The satellite signature is looking more like a tropical or subtropical system than a cold core system. Its moving over warmer SST's so we will need to watch this. I will give this a slight chance for development.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2044
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#32 Postby Hurricanehink » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:06 pm

Wow! That is always a shock. Not bad at all for April. The question is whether NHC will bother with it.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#33 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:21 pm

One thing to note, as it moves south, it will lose much of its vorticity as part of absolute vorticity is derived from the corolis parameter. Moving from 35N to 25N isabout as unfavorable as crossing the equator from 5N to 5S (.17 corolis reduction for the eq cross vs .15 for the 35-25N). This is about 3 times more unfavorable than a more realistic eq cross moving from 2N to 2S
Last edited by Derek Ortt on Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Rainband

#34 Postby Rainband » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:23 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:One thing to note, as it moves south, it will lose much of its vorticity as part of absolute vorticity is derived from the corolis parameter. Moving from 35N to 25N is many times more unfavorable than a system crossing the equator from 5N to 5S (see the horizontal momentum equations for more information)
makes sense :wink:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#35 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:26 pm

I just edited the post rainband as I just ran a check through the calculator. The effects of the corolis reduction are about the same as the eq cross, but many times more favorable than a 2N to 2S eq cross
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#36 Postby MWatkins » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:30 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:One thing to note, as it moves south, it will lose much of its vorticity as part of absolute vorticity is derived from the corolis parameter. Moving from 35N to 25N isabout as unfavorable as crossing the equator from 5N to 5S (.17 corolis reduction for the eq cross vs .15 for the 35-25N). This is about 3 times more unfavorable than a more realistic eq cross moving from 2N to 2S


It also looks like the dynamics are going to pull out...so whatever is there will probably wind down pretty quickly.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148503
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#37 Postby cycloneye » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:43 pm

Interesting that TWC is doing updates every half an hour at the top and bottom of the hour about the low with Jim Cantore.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#38 Postby george_r_1961 » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:50 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:it should be monitored as it is very close to the east coast of the USA


Derek if it caught your attention thats good enough for me. I have gone into a low alert mode here :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#39 Postby george_r_1961 » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:56 pm

Recommending a watch for a system moving AWAY from land? I agree its something to watch even though I dont think it will last long but lets not jump the gun. NWS already has heavy surf advisories and that is sufficient for now.
0 likes   

kevin

#40 Postby kevin » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:57 pm

This is greatone under a new name I think.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chaser1 and 533 guests