StormChasr wrote:Last year, they grossly underestimated the number of storms. It would make sense to go with the highest projection that is likely, for the sake of having people prepared. Not only is it good science--it is good public relations.
How do you figure that they grossly underestimated the number of storms last year? For named storms 15 was the upper end of their range. Hurricanes - they only missed by 1 from the upper end of their range. The only number they missed in a big way was Major Hurricanes but I doubt anyone would have predicted that 6 out of 9 hurricanes would have made Major status....





