Crossover names: do they keep same Pacific name?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Crossover names: do they keep same Pacific name?

#1 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 9:04 am

1) If a named Pacific system were able to cross into the Carribean or G.O.M. as a still intact TS+, would it retain the original Pacific name or would it be given a new Atlantic basin name?

2) a) If a named Pacific system were able to cross into the Carribean or G.O.M. but only as a TD (or less), would it retain the original Pacific name or would it be changed to an unnamed TD?

2 b) If that TD were to then regenerate into a TS once in the Atlantic basin, would it then be given an Atlantic basin name or would it keep its Pacific name?

3) Are any of these current naming rules new?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

#2 Postby Derecho » Wed May 18, 2005 9:13 am

All of the rules are long standing and have been used before...

Everything that crosses in either direction ATL-PAC or PAC-ATL gets a completely new name or designation.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 18, 2005 9:20 am

derecho,

the rules were changed after 1996 Cesar/Douglass; however, have not had to be implemented since then
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#4 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 9:21 am

Derecho wrote:All of the rules are long standing and have been used before...

Everything that crosses in either direction ATL-PAC or PAC-ATL gets a completely new name or designation.


Thanks Derecho. I thought I had seen a post on this BB about the name Adrian being retained no matter what, which seemed strange to me. So, I was starting to wonder if the naming rules had recently been changed to retain the original name. Someone had just emailed me this question. Before replying, I wanted to make sure of the correct answer.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#5 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 9:25 am

Derek Ortt wrote:derecho,

the rules were changed after 1996 Cesar/Douglass; however, have not had to be implemented since then


Derek/Derecho,

Obviously now I'm confused since I'm getting two opposite answers. I would appreciate answers to these three questions since they cover different situations:

1) If a named Pacific system were able to cross into the Carribean or G.O.M. as a still intact TS+, would it retain the original Pacific name or would it be given a new Atlantic basin name?

2) a) If a named Pacific system were able to cross into the Carribean or G.O.M. but only as a TD (or less), would it retain the original Pacific name or would it be changed to an unnamed TD?

2 b) If that TD were to then regenerate into a TS once in the Atlantic basin, would it then be given an Atlantic basin name or would it keep its Pacific name?

Thanks in advance.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 18, 2005 9:27 am

under the rules used in 2001, if the system remains in tact, it keeps its origional name. If it dissipates and reforms, it gets a new name
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#7 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 9:40 am

Derek Ortt wrote:under the rules used in 2001, if the system remains in tact, it keeps its origional name. If it dissipates and reforms, it gets a new name


Derek,
Thanks again. However, I'm still confused about my question 2 (a and b). As we know, a named storm in the Atlantic that weakens to a TD keeps its name instead of reverting to a number. If Adrian were to survive the crossover but only as a TD once in the Atlantic, would it actually become nameless (TD #1 in this case) until if and when it were able to restrengthen onto a TS and then pick up the Atlantic name or would it retain Adrian if it emerges as only a TD?

In other words, when you say "If it dissipates and reforms, it gets a new name", do you include weakening to a TD upon crossover as "dissipation", meaning the dropping of Adrian for good?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#8 Postby x-y-no » Wed May 18, 2005 9:44 am

On last night's show, Jaime Rhome said something like as long as there's something left to track, it keeps the same name.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#9 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 9:56 am

x-y-no wrote:On last night's show, Jaime Rhome said something like as long as there's something left to track, it keeps the same name.


Thank xy. So, this tells me that if it emerges on the Atlantic basin side as a TD, it will be called TD Adrian. I'm going to assume this to definitely be the new rule unless anyone else responds later with a different opinion.

So, there could actually be two "A" storms in the Atlantic basin or two of any letter for that matter. Weird. Anyone happen to know why they changed the rule?

Thanks Derecho, Derek, and x-y-no for your help.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#10 Postby Brent » Wed May 18, 2005 9:58 am

It would work just like any storm that moves over land, weakens to a depression and then moves back over water would.

The circulation MUST remain intact though for it to keep the same name from basin-to-basin.

I think Iris? in 1995 got the rules changed(it crossed from the Atlantic to EPAC)... how I do not know.
0 likes   
#neversummer

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#11 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 am

Brent wrote:It would work just like any storm that moves over land, weakens to a depression and then moves back over water would.

The circulation MUST remain intact though for it to keep the same name from basin-to-basin.

I think Iris? in 1995 got the rules changed(it crossed from the Atlantic to EPAC)... how I do not know.


Thanks Brent. Derek did say that 1996's Cesar/Douglass was the last crosover name change.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#12 Postby Brent » Wed May 18, 2005 10:11 am

Maybe so... it was sometime around then. I can barely remember that crossover.
0 likes   
#neversummer

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#13 Postby Brent » Wed May 18, 2005 10:13 am

0 likes   
#neversummer

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#14 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 10:16 am

You know, I'm now wondering if the rule change could possibly have been made in conjunction with the NHC taking over the EPAC. Does anyone know when the NHC took over the EPAC? Or have they had it for a long time?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#15 Postby Brent » Wed May 18, 2005 10:21 am

LarryWx wrote:You know, I'm now wondering if the rule change could possibly have been made in conjunction with the NHC taking over the EPAC. Does anyone know when the NHC took over the EPAC? Or have they had it for a long time?


Who issued advisories for the EPAC before then?? That one in Hawaii? :?:
0 likes   
#neversummer

Derek Ortt

#16 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 18, 2005 10:23 am

the epac had their own center until 1988 in San Fransisco, but the rule change was not made until after 1996
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#17 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 10:32 am

Derek Ortt wrote:the epac had their own center until 1988 in San Fransisco, but the rule change was not made until after 1996


Thanks. I kind of thought Hawaii may have had the EPAC for at least a few years. Perhaps they did during that 1988+ transition period?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#18 Postby wx247 » Wed May 18, 2005 10:59 am

Wow... am I confused!!!

So you are saying that potentially the Atlantic could see two A storms??
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#19 Postby LarryWx » Wed May 18, 2005 11:04 am

wx247 wrote:Wow... am I confused!!!

So you are saying that potentially the Atlantic could see two A storms??


Well, based on the new no name change rule mentioned here, that would seem possible. However, I suppose there may also be a rule that the next Atlantic storm would go right to the Atlantic "B" name, thus meaning no use of the Atlantic "A" name this season. I don't have a definite answer on this.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#20 Postby Hyperstorm » Wed May 18, 2005 11:47 am

The Atlantic will continue to use its original list of names, REGARDLESS of what happens with Adrian. It DOESN'T matter if the A storm Adrian re-develops in the Atlantic Basin because one thing doesn't have to do with the other....that is, the Atlantic will borrow the name Adrian for a while (if it regenerates with its original LLC), but it will NOT be an Atlantic storm...it will be a Pacific storm because of its origin being in the Pacific.

It will be the first time in history that the Atlantic will be using 2 "A" names since the policy was changed a few years ago...
Last edited by Hyperstorm on Wed May 18, 2005 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chaser1 and 541 guests