Atlantic basin temperature comparisons, 2005 vs 2004

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Atlantic basin temperature comparisons, 2005 vs 2004

#1 Postby x-y-no » Fri May 27, 2005 4:33 pm

Surface temperature this year:
Image

vs same date last year:
Image

----

26 degree isotherm depth this year:
Image

last year:
Image

----

Depth of the 20 degree isotherm this year:
Image


vs. the same date last year:
Image

(these figures come from the NOAA upper ocean heat content site http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/cyclone/data/)

----

If, as one member claimed in another thread, the high sea-surface temperatures observed across the basin are due to lower winds resulting in a lack of vertical mixing, one would expect to see a shallower depth for the isotherms. In fact, the opposite is evident across the entire basin.

No, the simple fact is that there is substantially more heat in the entire mixed layer across the entire basin than there was on this date last year.

Jan
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#2 Postby vbhoutex » Fri May 27, 2005 4:36 pm

Thanks Jan for that post. It is quite evident that the water is just getting plain hot and not just at the surface. This could indeed turn out to be a very active and interesting year in the tropics(as if it hasn't already started out that way with Adrian).
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148503
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#3 Postby cycloneye » Fri May 27, 2005 4:40 pm

:eek: :eek: Very revealing grafics that show how beneath the surface things are doing and do not bold well for many in the basin. :eek: :eek:
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

cyclonaut

#4 Postby cyclonaut » Fri May 27, 2005 5:38 pm

Yes this is very revealing & quite startling actually!

If this situation continues to unfold the way it is,it is going to be a interesting & to be honest,a dangerous season ahead.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#5 Postby x-y-no » Fri May 27, 2005 5:49 pm

Some more interesting figures to compare:

The "Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential" (THCP) is a measure of the energy available in the surface layer for fueling tropical cyclones.

(sorry about the size of the first one, they've changed their format)

TCHP for yesterday:
Image


Same date last year:
Image


End of June last year:
Image


End of July last year:
Image


End of August last year:
Image


As you can see, it's much warmer than it was even at the end of June last year. And while the western Caribbean and Gulf are cooler than they were by the end of July, the eastern Caribbean and the area east of the islands area are warmer than they were even at the peak of last year's season.

Jan
0 likes   

User avatar
SkeetoBite
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 515
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 8:25 am
Contact:

#6 Postby SkeetoBite » Fri May 27, 2005 7:06 pm

Animated SST comparison - May 26, 2004 to May 26, 2005

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#7 Postby LAwxrgal » Fri May 27, 2005 7:23 pm

That water is boiling :eek: Seems to be one straight line from the Caribbean clear to the Gulf.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

#8 Postby canegrl04 » Fri May 27, 2005 7:44 pm

This is quite alarming. :eek: If the shear in the Atlantic is relatively low this season, alot of people in the GOM and along the Easat coast will be in for alot of hurt :(
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23703
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#9 Postby gatorcane » Fri May 27, 2005 8:16 pm

With the water temperatures being warmer than last year..IF we have the same or less shear across the Atlantic...we'll see more tropical systems...I wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed last year :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#10 Postby senorpepr » Fri May 27, 2005 8:34 pm

Here's an idea that has been running through my mind lately: with the ITCZ further north than normal and the water temperatures being what they are, I wonder what the conditions through Northern Africa are like. Are they seeing lower-than-normal rainfall which would allow for more duststorms to exist? If so, the SAL will possibly negative the effects of the warmer water. On the flip side, if the rainfall rate is higher-than-normal......
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148503
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#11 Postby cycloneye » Fri May 27, 2005 8:44 pm

senorpepr wrote:Here's an idea that has been running through my mind lately: with the ITCZ further north than normal and the water temperatures being what they are, I wonder what the conditions through Northern Africa are like. Are they seeing lower-than-normal rainfall which would allow for more duststorms to exist? If so, the SAL will possibly negative the effects of the warmer water. On the flip side, if the rainfall rate is higher-than-normal......


Interesting thought Mike.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

#12 Postby Cookiely » Fri May 27, 2005 8:45 pm

senorpepr wrote:Here's an idea that has been running through my mind lately: with the ITCZ further north than normal and the water temperatures being what they are, I wonder what the conditions through Northern Africa are like. Are they seeing lower-than-normal rainfall which would allow for more duststorms to exist? If so, the SAL will possibly negative the effects of the warmer water. On the flip side, if the rainfall rate is higher-than-normal......

Did you see what Dr. Gray reported about the West African rainfall?
2 Earlier 1 June Statistical Hurricane Forecast Scheme
Our original early June seasonal hurricane forecast scheme was developed in the early 1990s and demonstrated significant hindcast skill for the period of 1950-1991 (Gray et al. 1994). This scheme included measurements of West African rainfall as an important forecast input.

Since the observed shift of Atlantic Ocean SST patterns in 1995 [and the implied increase in the strength of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation (THC)], our original 1 June forecast scheme (1994) has consistently underpredicted Atlantic basin hurricane activity. Our earlier 1 June statistical scheme used West African rainfall data as an important predictor. We do not understand why, but the previously observed (1950-1994) strong association between West Africa rainfall and Atlantic hurricanes has not been reliable since 1994. We have lost confidence in the previous 1 June statistical forecast scheme compared to our newly developed one. We have thus decided to discontinue our earliest 1 June forecast scheme.

Over the past couple of years, we have been using an updated statistical scheme that utilized NOAA/NCEP reanalysis data. However, this scheme used mostly data from the previous fall and winter, and therefore we have recently developed a new early June scheme that makes use of mostly spring data.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#13 Postby senorpepr » Fri May 27, 2005 8:54 pm

Cookiely wrote:
senorpepr wrote:Here's an idea that has been running through my mind lately: with the ITCZ further north than normal and the water temperatures being what they are, I wonder what the conditions through Northern Africa are like. Are they seeing lower-than-normal rainfall which would allow for more duststorms to exist? If so, the SAL will possibly negative the effects of the warmer water. On the flip side, if the rainfall rate is higher-than-normal......

Did you see what Dr. Gray reported about the West African rainfall?
2 Earlier 1 June Statistical Hurricane Forecast Scheme
Our original early June seasonal hurricane forecast scheme was developed in the early 1990s and demonstrated significant hindcast skill for the period of 1950-1991 (Gray et al. 1994). This scheme included measurements of West African rainfall as an important forecast input.

Since the observed shift of Atlantic Ocean SST patterns in 1995 [and the implied increase in the strength of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation (THC)], our original 1 June forecast scheme (1994) has consistently underpredicted Atlantic basin hurricane activity. Our earlier 1 June statistical scheme used West African rainfall data as an important predictor. We do not understand why, but the previously observed (1950-1994) strong association between West Africa rainfall and Atlantic hurricanes has not been reliable since 1994. We have lost confidence in the previous 1 June statistical forecast scheme compared to our newly developed one. We have thus decided to discontinue our earliest 1 June forecast scheme.

Over the past couple of years, we have been using an updated statistical scheme that utilized NOAA/NCEP reanalysis data. However, this scheme used mostly data from the previous fall and winter, and therefore we have recently developed a new early June scheme that makes use of mostly spring data.


No, I hadn't read that yet. I really haven't had a chance to sit down and read the whole report yet. However, his comments are very interesting. Although, he points out West Africa rainfall -- I wonder what the results would be if he factored in more regions across the Saharan Desert as well as Central Africa. Of course, with that is the lack of reliable observations throughout the continent.

Either way, my thoughts are if one thing could make this season not as favorable as most are saying, it would be the affects of the SAL. This is based off of the post 1994 era of above normal activity where a good wave would begin to take shape, only to have the SAL tear it apart. The remnants would then wait a few days to get away from the SAL and then redevelop. What that leads me to think, if the SAL is decreased as compared to previous years, this should allow systems to develop a bit earlier therefore allowing more time for dynamic cyclogenesis into a strong hurricane, which would then add to the possibility for increased hurricane and major hurricane landfall potential.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#14 Postby dhweather » Sat May 28, 2005 7:24 pm

Jan, great graphics, thanks for posting them.

Quite obviously, the tropics are very warm - scary potential this year.


David
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, Google [Bot], HurricaneRyan and 516 guests