
UKMET 144hrs scary if this is the norm.....say in sept
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Anonymous
UKMET 144hrs scary if this is the norm.....say in sept
Now this would be very bad if the 144 hr UKMET (a very good model-maybe the best along with euro) forecast became the norm for the season 2005 lets just put a hurricane where I did in this graphic
Where would it go--my choice is not the righthand turn though Im not so sure....


0 likes
In that example...unfortunately....if that were the steering layer...the psudo cyclone would already be past the point of recurvature and would be beneath the ridge axis on the backside...and would probably accelerate toward the coast in time.
Boooo.
MW
Boooo.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
-
Anonymous
MWatkins wrote:In that example...unfortunately....if that were the steering layer...the psudo cyclone would already be past the point of recurvature and would be beneath the ridge axis on the backside...and would probably accelerate toward the coast in time.
Boooo.
MW
Ok I agree but lets put the storm at 20N, 60W...Heading is NW...It is before approaching the split between the highs---then, would it go between the highs or go around the overall ridge and strike the US? I know they tend to turn if there is a weakness but how much of a weakness has to be present? is this map enough or do the highs have to be clearly seperated and not quite a ridge? Or would it be a close call?
0 likes
Jekyhe32210 wrote:MWatkins wrote:In that example...unfortunately....if that were the steering layer...the psudo cyclone would already be past the point of recurvature and would be beneath the ridge axis on the backside...and would probably accelerate toward the coast in time.
Boooo.
MW
Ok I agree but lets put the storm at 20N, 60W....It is before approaching the split between the highs---then, would it go between the highs or go around the overall ridge and strike the US? I know they tend to turn if there is a weakness but how much of a weakness has to be present? is this map enough or do the highs have to be clearly seperated and not quite a ridge? Or would it be a close call?
I don't think it would have a chance to catch the weakness. It may move WNW for a bit but if that were the steering layer...it doesnt look...in the model...like there would be a SW influence to pull the cyclone up to the N then NE.
Even in that spot the next 24 to 48 hour motion would probably net out at 285 or even further west than that.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: UKMET 144hrs scary if this is the norm.....say in sept
Jekyhe32210 wrote:Now this would be very bad if the 144 hr UKMET (a very good model-maybe the best along with euro) forecast became the norm for the season 2005 lets just put a hurricane where I did in this graphicWhere would it go--my choice is not the righthand turn though Im not so sure....
Florida is screwed if that's the setup.
0 likes
#neversummer
-
Scorpion
Yeah, another disasterous scenario for Florida!
I just hope it is not the second weekend in September because that's when we are meeting our family from Georgia in Disney for a few days....I'm already nervous enough about the timing, I don't need "hypothetical" hurricane monsters barreling in...LOL...
I just hope it is not the second weekend in September because that's when we are meeting our family from Georgia in Disney for a few days....I'm already nervous enough about the timing, I don't need "hypothetical" hurricane monsters barreling in...LOL...
0 likes
-
cyclonaut
-
Derek Ortt
depending upon the mean flow, that weakness may be enough to suck a storm out to sea. It does not take much of a weakness to drag a storm up and out. Last year, Frances looked as if it may turn to the Carolinas, due to a narrow weakness, but the weakness only remained for about 6 hours, not enough to drag it north into Carolina
0 likes
-
DoctorHurricane2003
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 147 guests



