96L for Caribbean System
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Scott_inVA
- Storm2k Forecaster

- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Lexington, Virginia
- Contact:
-
Stratosphere747
- Category 5

- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
- Eyes2theSkies
- Category 1

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:20 am
- Location: Was Florida now Charlotte, NC
- Contact:
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148503
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
cycloneye wrote: TROPICAL DEPRESSION INVEST (AL962005) ON 20050703 0000 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
050703 0000 050703 1200 050704 0000 050704 1200
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 17.8N 84.9W 18.6N 86.6W 19.7N 88.5W 21.1N 90.6W
BAMM 17.8N 84.9W 18.6N 86.6W 19.7N 88.5W 21.0N 90.5W
A98E 17.8N 84.9W 18.6N 87.0W 19.7N 88.9W 21.5N 90.6W
LBAR 17.8N 84.9W 18.7N 86.9W 20.1N 89.0W 21.8N 91.0W
SHIP 25KTS 32KTS 41KTS 48KTS
DSHP 25KTS 32KTS 30KTS 32KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
050705 0000 050706 0000 050707 0000 050708 0000
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 22.9N 92.5W 25.8N 95.2W 28.0N 96.3W 30.2N 95.5W
BAMM 22.6N 92.4W 25.2N 95.8W 27.4N 98.2W 29.0N 99.9W
A98E 23.9N 92.4W 27.6N 95.9W 30.6N 96.5W 33.8N 90.3W
LBAR 23.6N 92.6W 27.6N 94.3W 30.4N 92.1W 31.7N 86.8W
SHIP 54KTS 66KTS 68KTS 68KTS
DSHP 39KTS 50KTS 36KTS 28KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 17.8N LONCUR = 84.9W DIRCUR = 290DEG SPDCUR = 11KT
LATM12 = 17.0N LONM12 = 82.8W DIRM12 = 291DEG SPDM12 = 11KT
LATM24 = 16.2N LONM24 = 80.6W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 45NM WNDM12 = 20KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1012MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148503
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Eyes2theSkies wrote:did ya all notice the ukmet at the bottom of the screen...lol
That may by for invest 93E in EPAC.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
cycloneye wrote:Eyes2theSkies wrote:did ya all notice the ukmet at the bottom of the screen...lol
That may by for invest 93E in EPAC.
I believe so as well...
Code: Select all
WTNT80 EGRR 021711
MET OFFICE TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE FOR NORTH-EAST PACIFIC
AND ATLANTIC
GLOBAL MODEL DATA TIME 12UTC 02.07.2005
TROPICAL STORM ANALYSED IN THE MODEL AT POSITION : 11.9N 96.5W
VERIFYING TIME POSITION STRENGTH TENDENCY
-------------- -------- -------- --------
12UTC 02.07.2005 11.9N 96.5W WEAK
00UTC 03.07.2005 12.3N 96.8W WEAK INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 03.07.2005 13.1N 97.0W WEAK LITTLE CHANGE
00UTC 04.07.2005 14.3N 97.9W WEAK LITTLE CHANGE
12UTC 04.07.2005 14.6N 98.9W WEAK INTENSIFYING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 05.07.2005 15.3N 99.9W WEAK WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
12UTC 05.07.2005 15.7N 101.0W WEAK WEAKENING SLIGHTLY
00UTC 06.07.2005 BELOW TROPICAL STORM STRENGTH
THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
RSMCS. IT REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY TROPICAL CYCLONE SPECIALISTS
AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT
MET OFFICE, EXETER, UK
TOO 021711
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
Derek Ortt
yeah David, I has to mention C and A, that terrible twosome (I also meant drought relief, trying to post quickly before leaving the office)
Cannot see this being more intense than those two. GOM really isnt the most favorable place for weak systems to explode quickly, unlike the NW Carib. Remember, Alicia and Bret took 3 full days to get going, and Bret had to cross an eddy, in contrast to Mitch that only took 2 in the Carib while fighting shear, or Irene that went right away. This isn't going to have 3 full days in the GOM and doesn't appear as if there is going to be significant Carib development, which is why I am leaning toward a moderate TS (Earl got going quicker in 1998, but it was blown up by QG dynamics, which this isn't going to have aiding it)
Cannot see this being more intense than those two. GOM really isnt the most favorable place for weak systems to explode quickly, unlike the NW Carib. Remember, Alicia and Bret took 3 full days to get going, and Bret had to cross an eddy, in contrast to Mitch that only took 2 in the Carib while fighting shear, or Irene that went right away. This isn't going to have 3 full days in the GOM and doesn't appear as if there is going to be significant Carib development, which is why I am leaning toward a moderate TS (Earl got going quicker in 1998, but it was blown up by QG dynamics, which this isn't going to have aiding it)
0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5

- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
-
Anonymous
Derek Ortt wrote:yeah David, I has to mention C and A, that terrible twosome (I also meant drought relief, trying to post quickly before leaving the office)
Cannot see this being more intense than those two. GOM really isnt the most favorable place for weak systems to explode quickly, unlike the NW Carib. Remember, Alicia and Bret took 3 full days to get going, and Bret had to cross an eddy, in contrast to Mitch that only took 2 in the Carib while fighting shear, or Irene that went right away. This isn't going to have 3 full days in the GOM and doesn't appear as if there is going to be significant Carib development, which is why I am leaning toward a moderate TS (Earl got going quicker in 1998, but it was blown up by QG dynamics, which this isn't going to have aiding it)
The only thing is...this IMO will be a TD/TS by the time it enters the Gulf...if it makes the turn to the north south of TX/LA Border, waters are warmer than a hot tub. I would think 80-90 mph atleast by landfall given the favorable pattern.
0 likes
-
Anonymous
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
The thing is it has to go over the Yact first. Which has weaken if not distroyed stronger. If this thing reopens back into a wave the chance of it redeveloping are normally not high. So once back into the Gulf is when we have to start watching. If it would develop a defined LLC/Tropical storm before landfall then I would be more impressed with its.
Also to note the 950 level of the Gfs shows it heading westward with a sharp northward turn.
Also to note the 950 level of the Gfs shows it heading westward with a sharp northward turn.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: chaser1 and 528 guests






