Frederic1979 wrote:I thought I covered stacked systems and the boobs present in the gulf earlier today.
Interesting...
Moderator: S2k Moderators

southerngale wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I dont want to tip my hand for the 11 p.m. forecast...
but I can say the new landfall intensity will be SIGNIFICANTLY higher than 70KT
Why? Because the LLC might relocate? I thought that might affect the track, but the landfall intensity too?

dhweather wrote:mikey mike wrote:what does ‘‘stacked’’ mean AirForce Met?
It means getting the low-level circulation vertically lined up with the
mid-level curculation, hence, stacked.
DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:I am VERY VERY concerned about who sees this system based on shear projection charts, SSTs, and no dry air in the vicinity of 03L. I will not issue an intensity forecast right now, but I will say that I think this might be a horrible system....and that I hope that it does not head to Houston.


southerngale wrote:Ok, thanks Brent and Derek. So if it relocates further north or NNE, do ya'll think the track would shift too?

These basically are first thoughts. Its hard to make an accurate intensity forecast until it raeches the GOM. Sor ight now, the idea is, if its stronger now, itll be stronger later.mikey mike wrote:Thanks all for the explanations.In other words this thing is getting stronger than first thought?


ALhurricane wrote:Let's see... we have G-IV mission tomorrow... the GFS will get the data for tomorrow night's 00z run which means...
Landfall Tampa Bay!!![]()
j/k everybody!! I just had to get that out of my system after the complete GFS disaster, especially with Frances last year.
I truly do hope and anticipate this mission will help the models tomorrow.

Brent wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I dont want to tip my hand for the 11 p.m. forecast...
but I can say the new landfall intensity will be SIGNIFICANTLY higher than 70KT
I would agree...

LAwxrgal wrote:Brent wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I dont want to tip my hand for the 11 p.m. forecast...
but I can say the new landfall intensity will be SIGNIFICANTLY higher than 70KT
I would agree...
Well, I agree with the poster above. Cindy DEFINITELY has my attention now.

Brent wrote:LAwxrgal wrote:Brent wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I dont want to tip my hand for the 11 p.m. forecast...
but I can say the new landfall intensity will be SIGNIFICANTLY higher than 70KT
I would agree...
Well, I agree with the poster above. Cindy DEFINITELY has my attention now.
This is starting to remind me of Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne and the other storms in between and how I had to choose which one to be focused on.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 673 guests