TD 3 looking sick

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Huckster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 394
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:33 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

TD 3 looking sick

#1 Postby Huckster » Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:52 am

Despite continued convection in the bands to the north and east of the center, this thing is looking sick. It looks like it's ingested dry air. The convection near the center just can't quite get going. Also, the impressive outflow on the west is really being inhibited now. It looks like the shear factor is starting to kick in. I think the farther this thing goes west, the weaker it will remain.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: TD 3 looking sick

#2 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:56 am

Huckster wrote:Despite continued convection in the bands to the north and east of the center, this thing is looking sick. It looks like it's ingested dry air. The convection near the center just can't quite get going. Also, the impressive outflow on the west is really being inhibited now. It looks like the shear factor is starting to kick in. I think the farther this thing goes west, the weaker it will remain.


I wouldn't say that so soon.
0 likes   

Rainband

#3 Postby Rainband » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:25 am

It's a sheared mess
0 likes   

User avatar
Wnghs2007
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6836
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
Contact:

#4 Postby Wnghs2007 » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:27 am

Yep but they just found a 42 knt flight level wind, refer to the Recon Reports thread to find further information. 8-)
0 likes   

Rainband

#5 Postby Rainband » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:31 am

Wnghs2007 wrote:Yep but they just found a 42 knt flight level wind, refer to the Recon Reports thread to find further information. 8-)
extrapolate that to the surface.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wnghs2007
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6836
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
Contact:

#6 Postby Wnghs2007 » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:35 am

Rainband wrote:
Wnghs2007 wrote:Yep but they just found a 42 knt flight level wind, refer to the Recon Reports thread to find further information. 8-)
extrapolate that to the surface.


Using 10 or 15 percent reduction?

42 knts - 4.2 knts aka 10% = 37.8 knts

42 knts - 6.3 knts aka 15% = 35.7 knts
0 likes   

Rainband

#7 Postby Rainband » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:37 am

Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#8 Postby mobilebay » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:38 am

Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wnghs2007
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6836
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
Contact:

#9 Postby Wnghs2007 » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:39 am

mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#10 Postby mobilebay » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:41 am

Wnghs2007 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.

Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
0 likes   

User avatar
Wnghs2007
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6836
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
Contact:

#11 Postby Wnghs2007 » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:42 am

mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


Oh and using a reduction ratio...

49 knts - 4.9 knts aka 10% = 44.1 knts

or

49 knts - 7.4 knts aka 15% = 41.6 knts
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#12 Postby mobilebay » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:43 am

Wnghs2007 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


Oh and using a reduction ratio...

49 knts - 4.9 knts aka 10% = 44.1 knts

or

49 knts - 7.4 knts aka 15% = 41.6 knts

They find a couple more of those in that NE quad you can bet we will have Cindy!
0 likes   

Rainband

#13 Postby Rainband » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:44 am

mobilebay wrote:
Wnghs2007 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.

Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
I am going by the symmetry and agree it may have strong gusts but I agree with the post I read that said it looks to be embedded in the trof and elongated.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#14 Postby mobilebay » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:49 am

Rainband wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Wnghs2007 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.

Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
I am going by the symmetry and agree it may have strong gusts but I agree with the post I read that said it looks to be embedded in the trof and elongated.

O'h it is not well organized by any stretch of the imagination. :lol:
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#15 Postby clfenwi » Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:12 am

Note that flight level in this situation is 5000 feet, not the usual 1500 feet.

If I decoded the dropsonde observation correctly (see recon thread) there were 43 knot winds at 850 mb (roughly flight level) but only 17 knot winds at the surface.
0 likes   

Rainband

#16 Postby Rainband » Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:12 am

mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Wnghs2007 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.

Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.


And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.

Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
I am going by the symmetry and agree it may have strong gusts but I agree with the post I read that said it looks to be embedded in the trof and elongated.

O'h it is not well organized by any stretch of the imagination. :lol:
It is still not a typical TS. :lol: :roll:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 680 guests