GFS shows Mobile Bay/MS border
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- hurricanetrack
- HurricaneTrack.com

- Posts: 1781
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
GFS shows Mobile Bay/MS border
I hope I am not repeating another post- but the 0z GFS now shows Mobile Bay area (or even MS/AL border) for a landfall- quite a jog back to the east like Pasch alluded to earlier today. We're also within 5 days of landfall, so these runs are getting to be more and more important.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_096m.gif
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_096m.gif
0 likes
- ALhurricane
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 452
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Daphne, AL
Major problem with the 00z GFS..
way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies
once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?
way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies
once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?
0 likes
- Houstonia
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 829
- Age: 61
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
- Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.
dauphin island
DI can't do with another major hurricane. They only had about 6 months to recover from last season and they got hit right away with Cindy.
0 likes
- AL Chili Pepper
- Category 3

- Posts: 873
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
As ALhurricane said, GFS is not doing well in the short term. We know CMC/Canadian is bad. NAM is bad as well. All of those show the FL landfalls.
The others are showing NO-Mobile landfalls. That's where I'm going right now.
Edit: GFS is NOT showing a FL Landfall. Its showing Mobile as well.
The others are showing NO-Mobile landfalls. That's where I'm going right now.
Edit: GFS is NOT showing a FL Landfall. Its showing Mobile as well.
Last edited by jkt21787 on Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
- AL Chili Pepper
- Category 3

- Posts: 873
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
ALhurricane wrote:Major problem with the 00z GFS..
way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies![]()
once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?
I'm not a Pro-Met and don't claim to be. However, how bad of a run could it be? It is in tightly clustered with other models NOGAPS,UKMET,GFDL, and the NHC projected path. The GFS has been showing this area for days. It had one bad run at 12Z and shifted back East, just like the NHC said it would in their 5PM Discussion.
0 likes
Does anyone know of a static map that shows computer models (like the one on Weather Underground here) but doesn't use the Mercator projection?
I like this one, but I think it moves depending on the storm's location. (I'm trying to make a Google Earth image overlay that will work for most storms.)[/url]
I like this one, but I think it moves depending on the storm's location. (I'm trying to make a Google Earth image overlay that will work for most storms.)[/url]
0 likes
also the 00Z UKMET stays exacty the Same= New orleans! I will post the Link in a minute.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
Last edited by mobilebay on Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
mobilebay wrote:also the 00Z UKMET stays exacty the Same= New orleans!
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/CGI/PUBLIC/w ... rp&tau=096
UKMET has been and continues to remain my favored model, for its consistency in this similar track.
0 likes
mobilebay wrote:ALhurricane wrote:Major problem with the 00z GFS..
way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies![]()
once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?
I'm not a Pro-Met and don't claim to be. However, how bad of a run could it be? It is in tightly clustered with other models NOGAPS,UKMET,GFDL, and the NHC projected path. The GFS has been showing this area for days. It had one bad run at 12Z and shifted back East, just like the NHC said it would in their 5PM Discussion.
Its NOT a BAD run...It may have Missed the Initial Position slightly but It still Clustered with all the others!
0 likes
rtd2 wrote:mobilebay wrote:ALhurricane wrote:Major problem with the 00z GFS..
way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies![]()
once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?
I'm not a Pro-Met and don't claim to be. However, how bad of a run could it be? It is in tightly clustered with other models NOGAPS,UKMET,GFDL, and the NHC projected path. The GFS has been showing this area for days. It had one bad run at 12Z and shifted back East, just like the NHC said it would in their 5PM Discussion.
Its NOT a BAD run...It may have Missed the Initial Position slightly but It still Clustered with all the others!
No, its not nearly as bad as CMC and NAM. However, its missed position and too far N and E could mean its Mobile landfall is a bit east than it should be. Its best to wait for additional runs of course to latch on to the meaning here.
0 likes
NOW!! here is the 00Z UKMET= New orleans. Sorry about the Above.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
The point I've been trying to make is there is a pretty tight cluster of models that calls for landfall between New Orleans and Pensacola. These models include The GFS, UKMET, GFDL, NOGAPS, and the NHC model suite. Note- the NHC model suite will probably shift a little East on the next run because of the GFS.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
The point I've been trying to make is there is a pretty tight cluster of models that calls for landfall between New Orleans and Pensacola. These models include The GFS, UKMET, GFDL, NOGAPS, and the NHC model suite. Note- the NHC model suite will probably shift a little East on the next run because of the GFS.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 665 guests

