Shuttle Return to Flight scrubbed

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#21 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:33 pm

NASA TV just said its a scrub. Vehicle problem.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38118
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#22 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:35 pm

Fuel problem.

May be a few days(next week) before it can launch. Very bad news.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
Roxy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:58 am
Location: Houston (Clear Lake)

#23 Postby Roxy » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:35 pm

SCRUB! Today's launch has been scrubbed for today due to a problem with the ECO early cut-off fuel sensors. A problem with these sensors was noted during the fueling tests on Discovery earlier this spring.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#24 Postby rtd2 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:40 pm

Roxy wrote:
SCRUB! Today's launch has been scrubbed for today due to a problem with the ECO early cut-off fuel sensors. A problem with these sensors was noted during the fueling tests on Discovery earlier this spring.



I think that sensor is Made in NOLA
0 likes   

User avatar
Roxy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:58 am
Location: Houston (Clear Lake)

#25 Postby Roxy » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:44 pm

rtd2 wrote:
Roxy wrote:
SCRUB! Today's launch has been scrubbed for today due to a problem with the ECO early cut-off fuel sensors. A problem with these sensors was noted during the fueling tests on Discovery earlier this spring.



I think that sensor is Made in NOLA


All I can dig up about ECO failure thus far is that it's the same type of failure that affected the Boeing Delta IV launch. If I find more, I will let you know.

:)
Last edited by Roxy on Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#26 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:45 pm

gtalum wrote:It will be good to start having regular Shuttle missions to the ISS. Hey GalvestonDuck, do you know if they found a way to boost the ISS without the Shuttle? Before the demise of the Columbia, one of the Shuttle's duties on ISS missions was to actually pull the ISS into higher orbits, since at the time the ISS's boosters were not yet installed. The ISS, as with all near-Earth satellites, has a natural tendency to orbital decay.



The Soyuz was also able to assist in those boosts. NASA prefers to allow the ISS to reach a lower orbit prior to a Shuttle rendezvous so the Shuttle doesn't have to expend as much fuel and so it can carry a heavier payload.


Darn! on the scrub. :(
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#27 Postby HurryKane » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:45 pm

GAHH flippin' cookies.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#28 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:00 pm

Roxy wrote:
rtd2 wrote:
Roxy wrote:
SCRUB! Today's launch has been scrubbed for today due to a problem with the ECO early cut-off fuel sensors. A problem with these sensors was noted during the fueling tests on Discovery earlier this spring.



I think that sensor is Made in NOLA


All I can dig up about ECO failure thus far is that it's the same type of failure that affected the Boeing Delta IV launch. If I find more, I will let you know.

:)


It's also something that was a previous issue while preparing for STS-114:
http://nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=42
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146228
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#29 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:32 pm

A faulty fuel sensor aboard Discovery today forced NASA to scrub its first attempt to launch a space shuttle since the Columbia disaster 2 1/2 years ago. "A low-level fuel sensor in the external fuel tank, one of a set of four -- two of which are needed to work" forced mission controllers to postpone the launch for at least the day. "It will take some time really to understand what to do to remedy the situation," NASA said.

Better scrub than be sorry later.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#30 Postby Skywatch_NC » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:14 pm

From this article...I'm still wondering...is the flight still ON?

Shuttle Countdown Enters Final Hours

POSTED: 2:44 pm EDT July 13, 2005
UPDATED: 2:44 pm EDT July 13, 2005

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. --

With a brief but embarrassing setback behind them, NASA crews fueled Discovery for liftoff Wednesday afternoon on the first space shuttle flight in 2 1/2 years. The only possible obstacle appeared to be an increasing chance of thunderstorms.

A temporary window cover fell off the shuttle and damaged thermal tiles near the tail Tuesday afternoon. The problem was announced just two hours after NASA declared Discovery ready to return a shuttle to space for the first time since the Columbia disaster.

The mishap was an eerie reminder of the very thing that doomed Columbia _ damage to the spaceship's fragile thermal shield.

Discovery and its crew of seven were set to blast off at 3:51 p.m. EDT on a flight to the international space station. The chance of acceptable weather at launch time was reduced to 40 percent, from 60 percent on Tuesday.

Fueling of the external tank began more than an hour late after workers changed a part on a launch-pad heater. NASA officials said the swapping out of the part wouldn't affect the launch time. With fueling over, a team of inspectors made extra checks for any signs of ice caused by the super-cold fuel.

Ice falling from the tank could be lethal if its hit the orbiter during liftoff. A chunk of foam insulation the size of a carryon suitcase fell off Columbia's fuel tank at liftoff and slammed into a reinforced carbon panel on the shuttle's wing, creating a hole that brought the spacecraft crashing down in pieces during its return to Earth on Feb. 1, 2003.

Discovery crew members appeared relaxed on NASA television just hours before liftoff. Astronaut Stephen Robinson strummed a guitar as he and fellow crew members sat around a table holding a large cake.

The husband of Discovery commander Eileen Collins said Wednesday that his wife expressed having "some butterflies" when they talked the night before.

"Anytime you're an astronaut, you run a risk," Pat Youngs told The Associated Press. "But from all I've seen, from management, engineers ... support personnel and the astronauts themselves, there is a lot of hard work to right things and get back to spaceflight." It will be Collins' fourth shuttle flight.

NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said Wednesday that he trusted the safety of the shuttle so much that he would ride it if he could. He said he met Tuesday with members of the Columbia families and assured them that NASA had learned lessons from that tragic flight.

"I think it is as safe as we know how to make it be, and there are a lot of unknowns remaining in spaceflight," Griffin said.

The plastic cover on one of Discovery's cockpit windows came loose Tuesday while the spaceship was on the launch pad, falling more than 60 feet and striking a bulge in the fuselage, said Stephanie Stilson, the NASA manager in charge of Discovery's launch preparations.

No one knows why the cover _ held in place with tape and weighing less than 2 pounds _ fell off, she said. The covers are used to protect the windows while the shuttle is on the launch pad, then removed before liftoff.

Two tiles on an aluminum panel were damaged, and the entire panel was replaced with a spare. Stilson called it a minor repair job.

The families of the seven astronauts killed during Columbia's catastrophic re-entry praised the accident investigators, a NASA oversight group and the space agency itself for defining and reducing the dangers.

Like those who lost loved ones in the Apollo 1 spacecraft fire and the Challenger launch explosion, the Columbia families said they grieve deeply "but know the exploration of space must go on."

"We hope we have learned and will continue to learn from each of these accidents so that we will be as safe as we can be in this high-risk endeavor," they said in a statement. "Godspeed, Discovery."

Discovery, setting off on the 114th space shuttle flight in 24 years, has a redesigned external fuel tank and nearly 50 other improvements made in the wake of the Columbia tragedy.

During their 12-day flight, Discovery's astronauts will test various techniques for patching cracks and holes in the thermal shielding.

They also will try out a new 50-foot boom designed to help them find any damage caused by liftoff debris. That is on top of all the pictures of the spacecraft that will be taken by more than 100 cameras positioned around the launching site and aboard two planes and the shuttle itself.

http://www.wral.com/news/4718845/detail.html

Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146228
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#31 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:17 pm

Image

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Florida (CNN) -- A faulty fuel sensor aboard the space shuttle Discovery forced NASA on Wednesday to scrub its first attempt to launch a shuttle after the Columbia disaster 2 1/2 years ago.

NASA said the device was showing low fuel levels despite the exterior tank having been filled just hours before.

"It will take some time really to understand what to do to remedy the situation," NASA said. "We haven't ruled out tomorrow, but that's speculative."

The current launch window expires July 31, and the next begins in September. A Thursday launch would be at 3:28 p.m.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#32 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:25 pm

Skywatch_NC wrote:From this article...I'm still wondering...is the flight still ON?

Don't know why that story came out, but is not happening today. That is certain.

Also as an update, we have learned from early meetings that it will be AT LEAST Monday, if not the September window. It all depends on whether the shuttle has to be taken off the launch pad to be fixed or not. If it does, it definitely won't come until the September window.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#33 Postby Stephanie » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:45 pm

I think that at this time they need to thoroughly COMB that shuttle to make sure that everything is fastened tight and working properly. Like Luis said, better to be safe than sorry.

I don't think that this flight was meant to be. They should wait until September.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wnghs2007
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6836
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
Contact:

#34 Postby Wnghs2007 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:53 pm

There saying it could be a design flaw now....If so that would scrub the launch until October :grr:
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#35 Postby Skywatch_NC » Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:20 pm

Latest word is...hopefully by Saturday. :)

http://www.wral.com/technology/4711825/detail.html

Eric
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38118
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#36 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:13 pm

Skywatch_NC wrote:Latest word is...hopefully by Saturday. :)

http://www.wral.com/technology/4711825/detail.html

Eric


NASA officials say that's the VERY best scenario, I wouldn't bank on that. I'll be shocked if it goes off before the window closes on July 31st.

I hope I'm wrong though.
0 likes   
#neversummer

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38118
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#37 Postby Brent » Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:01 pm

Sunday launch at the earliest but the chances are very small.
0 likes   
#neversummer


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests