H.Emily Advisorys

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#101 Postby clfenwi » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:06 pm

Swimdude wrote:Now, um, that's what we refer to as "bombing", correct? Because I mean... @#$%! 60 to 90 mph... In 3 hours?


Not the greatest bit of work by NHC on the 8 PM advisory... there's no way it was 60 mph at that point... that was a carry-over from the estimates of previous advisories... the recon plane had not sampled the wind enviroment yet, but had done a percusory pass through the eye to get the pressure ob...
0 likes   

texasheat

#102 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:07 pm

Mac wrote:I have a feeling she is going to clip the tip of the Yucatan, but not nearly as far south as the forecast track projects. I am thinking she'll just clip the tip of the Yucatan and end up being a threat from Corpus to Houston.


it matters about that ridge.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#103 Postby yoda » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:08 pm

Ver bist du eine discussion? :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148502
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#104 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:08 pm

**Awaiting Discussion**
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Mac

#105 Postby Mac » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:09 pm

texasheat wrote:
Mac wrote:I have a feeling she is going to clip the tip of the Yucatan, but not nearly as far south as the forecast track projects. I am thinking she'll just clip the tip of the Yucatan and end up being a threat from Corpus to Houston.


it matters about that ridge.


Yeah, I know. I think the ridge is going to weaken a bit by the time Emma gets that far. I could be wrong, but I think she's going to stay WNW to the Yucatan, and then head NW from there. Just my amateur opinion though.
0 likes   

texasheat

#106 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:10 pm

if the ridge does weaken that would take her to around freeport-la.

why do you think the models are weaking
0 likes   

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2072
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

#107 Postby johngaltfla » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:10 pm

cycloneye wrote:**Awaiting Discussion**


I think I can sum it up since it's so late:

:wall:
0 likes   

Mac

#108 Postby Mac » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:11 pm

texasheat wrote:if the ridge does weaken that would take her to around freeport-la.

why do you think the models are weaking


I don't understand your question. LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#109 Postby yoda » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:13 pm

Hurricane Emily Discussion Number 13


Statement as of 11:00 PM EDT on July 13, 2005


Emily has rapidly intensified into a hurricane this evening. The
first aircraft fix at 2331z indicated the low level center was
beneath the western edge of the deep convection and measured a
central pressure of 1000 mb. 00z Dvorak intensity estimates ranged
from 50 to 65 kt...with the stronger estimates based on a low level
center in the middle of the deep convection. Later recon fixes
showed that the center had reformed to the northeast within the
convection...and the wind and pressure data soon responded. The
pressure has most recently fallen to 992 mb...and the maximum 850
mb flight level wind has been 79 kt...supporting at least 63 kt at
the surface. However...reduction to the surface of a dropsonde
profile just north of the center at 01z supports surface winds of
80 kt...which is the advisory intensity. The intensity forecast is
adjusted upward from the previous advisory...making Emily a major
hurricane by 48 hours. This could be conservative.
Due to the scatter in the recon fixes during the past couple of
hours...initial motion is uncertain but is estimated at 275/16.
Except for a slight northward adjustment to account for the new
position...the track forecast is very similar to the previous
advisory. The NWS models...GFS and GFDL...have changed little
since the previous runs...while the Navy models...GFDN and
NOGAPS...have shifted only slightly to the south. The official
forecast takes Emily west-northwestward across the Caribbean
Sea...in accordance with the tightly clustered dynamical model
guidance.

Forecaster Knabb


forecast positions and Max winds

initial 14/0300z 11.9n 61.1w 80 kt
12hr VT 14/1200z 12.5n 63.5w 85 kt
24hr VT 15/0000z 13.4n 66.7w 90 kt
36hr VT 15/1200z 14.5n 70.0w 95 kt
48hr VT 16/0000z 15.5n 73.2w 100 kt
72hr VT 17/0000z 17.5n 79.0w 100 kt
96hr VT 18/0000z 19.5n 85.0w 100 kt
120hr VT 19/0000z 21.0n 90.5w 90 kt
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#110 Postby Swimdude » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:13 pm

johngaltfla wrote:
cycloneye wrote:**Awaiting Discussion**


I think I can sum it up since it's so late:

:wall:


Amen. Yeesh, I really want to see this discussion... It should start with something to the effect of, "Well, that 8 p.m. was a load of @#$%."
0 likes   

User avatar
micktooth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado

#111 Postby micktooth » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:14 pm

I think they have run out of ways to discuss this entire season! The NHC is at a loss for words. :D
0 likes   

gkrangers

#112 Postby gkrangers » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:15 pm

Gee, that wasn't as interesting as I was expecting.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#113 Postby yoda » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:16 pm

gkrangers wrote:Gee, that wasn't as interesting as I was expecting.


Same. I was expecting a bit more... but we will go with what they gave us.
0 likes   

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2072
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

#114 Postby johngaltfla » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:16 pm

micktooth wrote:I think they have run out of ways to discuss this entire season! The NHC is at a loss for words. :D


I think they should use this disclaimer from last night's advisories....

THE ONLY SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE PREDICTOR IN THE LATEST SHIPS STATISTICAL MODEL RUN IS CLIMATOLOGY. SO FAR...THE 2005 HURRICANE SEASON SEEMS TO HAVE LITTLE INTEREST IN CLIMATOLOGY.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#115 Postby gkrangers » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:17 pm

yoda wrote:
gkrangers wrote:Gee, that wasn't as interesting as I was expecting.


Same. I was expecting a bit more... but we will go with what they gave us.
The most important thing is it finally solidified its center. Reformed more towards the center of the convection, and it'll stay there now. It was probably jumping all around earlier today.
0 likes   

texasheat

#116 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:17 pm

Mac,

why do you think the ridge will weaken
0 likes   

User avatar
micktooth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado

#117 Postby micktooth » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:17 pm

That's it? Boring discussion. Time to go to bed. :sleeping:
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#118 Postby Andrew92 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:17 pm

gkrangers wrote:Gee, that wasn't as interesting as I was expecting.


Fire Knabb. Where's Stewart when ya need him?

OK, seriously, Knabb is obviously a good forecaster....keep him for the advisories, but not the discussions. Fire him from that.

-Andrew92
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#119 Postby Skywatch_NC » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:18 pm

cycloneye wrote:140312
TCDAT5
HURRICANE EMILY DISCUSSION NUMBER 13
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
11 PM EDT WED JUL 13 2005

EMILY HAS RAPIDLY INTENSIFIED INTO A HURRICANE THIS EVENING. THE
FIRST AIRCRAFT FIX AT 2331Z INDICATED THE LOW LEVEL CENTER WAS
BENEATH THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE DEEP CONVECTION AND MEASURED A
CENTRAL PRESSURE OF 1000 MB. 00Z DVORAK INTENSITY ESTIMATES RANGED
FROM 50 TO 65 KT...WITH THE STRONGER ESTIMATES BASED ON A LOW LEVEL
CENTER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DEEP CONVECTION. LATER RECON FIXES
SHOWED THAT THE CENTER HAD REFORMED TO THE NORTHEAST WITHIN THE
CONVECTION...AND THE WIND AND PRESSURE DATA SOON RESPONDED. THE
PRESSURE HAS MOST RECENTLY FALLEN TO 992 MB...AND THE MAXIMUM 850
MB FLIGHT LEVEL WIND HAS BEEN 79 KT...SUPPORTING AT LEAST 63 KT AT
THE SURFACE. HOWEVER...REDUCTION TO THE SURFACE OF A DROPSONDE
PROFILE JUST NORTH OF THE CENTER AT 01Z SUPPORTS SURFACE WINDS OF
80 KT...WHICH IS THE ADVISORY INTENSITY. THE INTENSITY FORECAST IS
ADJUSTED UPWARD FROM THE PREVIOUS ADVISORY...MAKING EMILY A MAJOR
HURRICANE BY 48 HOURS. THIS COULD BE CONSERVATIVE.

DUE TO THE SCATTER IN THE RECON FIXES DURING THE PAST COUPLE OF
HOURS...INITIAL MOTION IS UNCERTAIN BUT IS ESTIMATED AT 275/16.
EXCEPT FOR A SLIGHT NORTHWARD ADJUSTMENT TO ACCOUNT FOR THE NEW
POSITION...THE TRACK FORECAST IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS
ADVISORY. THE NWS MODELS...GFS AND GFDL...HAVE CHANGED LITTLE
SINCE THE PREVIOUS RUNS...WHILE THE NAVY MODELS...GFDN AND
NOGAPS...HAVE SHIFTED ONLY SLIGHTLY TO THE SOUTH. THE OFFICIAL
FORECAST TAKES EMILY WEST-NORTHWESTWARD ACROSS THE CARIBBEAN
SEA...IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIGHTLY CLUSTERED DYNAMICAL MODEL
GUIDANCE.


FORECASTER KNABB


FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INITIAL 14/0300Z 11.9N 61.1W 80 KT
12HR VT 14/1200Z 12.5N 63.5W 85 KT
24HR VT 15/0000Z 13.4N 66.7W 90 KT
36HR VT 15/1200Z 14.5N 70.0W 95 KT
48HR VT 16/0000Z 15.5N 73.2W 100 KT
72HR VT 17/0000Z 17.5N 79.0W 100 KT
96HR VT 18/0000Z 19.5N 85.0W 100 KT
120HR VT 19/0000Z 21.0N 90.5W 90 KT

THE ONLY SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE PREDICTOR IN THE LATEST SHIPS STATISTICAL MODEL RUN IS CLIMATOLOGY. SO FAR...THE 2005 HURRICANE SEASON SEEMS TO HAVE LITTLE INTEREST IN CLIMATOLOGY.


There we go...all fixed. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#120 Postby Swimdude » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:18 pm

MAKING EMILY A MAJOR
HURRICANE BY 48 HOURS. THIS COULD BE CONSERVATIVE.


That stands out the most, to me.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, jhpigott, MetroMike, Sciencerocks and 332 guests