I wonder if NHC is going to post the track sometime soon.

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#21 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:39 pm

Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.
0 likes   
#neversummer

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#22 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:39 pm

Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:

lol, NHC said its much the same as before, just slight northward movement for the new fix. It may not stay that way, but NHC isn't going to go crazy on one set of models.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#23 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:40 pm

Swimdude wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
texasheat wrote:the underground map is the southest model that i have noticed. rest show her going north of yucatan or just tiping it.

NHC does not believe in the north trend yet, check this map...
THIS IS THE OFFICIAL FORECAST:
Image

It doesn't turn more west at the end. Sorry for that. Don't know why I said it.



Actually, yes it does. *Holds up a ruler to the screen*

Yeah, I think you are right. I know what I'm talking about!
0 likes   

Mac

#24 Postby Mac » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:40 pm

Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#25 Postby rtd2 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:41 pm

texasheat wrote:no. notice the rest of the models trending to the north.


CORRECT...Local met said the Models ARE trending north and In the SHORT TERM will continue...
0 likes   

gkrangers

#26 Postby gkrangers » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:41 pm

Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:
"southest" - I quote your buddy texasheat. They are putting out some real wizzes over there.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#27 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:42 pm

Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:


Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.
0 likes   
#neversummer

texasheat

#28 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:42 pm

gkrangers wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:
"southest" - I quote your buddy texasheat. They are putting out some real wizzes over there.


what do you mean?
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#29 Postby stormie_skies » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:44 pm

Brent wrote:Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.


THANK YOU!

I was waiting for somebody to remind everyone of that.... :lol:
0 likes   

gkrangers

#30 Postby gkrangers » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:44 pm

The models are obviously having a tough time forecasting the strenght of the ridge in the long term. In the last 48 hours theyve gone from a very strong westward ridge, to one thats more conservative. Which has caused the models to shift towards the north.

Once Emily gets out in the central/western Carribbean. Its likely there will be upper atmosphere flights to analyze the upper air pattern, and specifically the strenght of the ridge.
0 likes   

Mac

#31 Postby Mac » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:44 pm

Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:


Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.


LOL That was exactly my point, Brent. At 96 hours out, the track is bound to be wrong to some degree. I wasn't claiming to be right...just that the NHC track is bound to be wrong at this point. Just a little levity.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#32 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:45 pm

Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:


Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.


LOL That was exactly my point, Brent. At 96 hours out, the track is bound to be wrong to some degree. I wasn't claiming to be right...just that the NHC track is bound to be wrong at this point. Just a little levity.


Do you happen to live in Texas??? :lol:
0 likes   
#neversummer

Mac

#33 Postby Mac » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:46 pm

Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:


Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.


LOL That was exactly my point, Brent. At 96 hours out, the track is bound to be wrong to some degree. I wasn't claiming to be right...just that the NHC track is bound to be wrong at this point. Just a little levity.


Do you happen to live in Texas??? :lol:


No, I live in Nashville. So Emma is going to have to build up one helluva head of steam if I'm going to wishcast her upon myself. :lol:
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#34 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:47 pm

Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:


Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.


LOL That was exactly my point, Brent. At 96 hours out, the track is bound to be wrong to some degree. I wasn't claiming to be right...just that the NHC track is bound to be wrong at this point. Just a little levity.


Do you happen to live in Texas??? :lol:

I was going to ask that.

We know where texasheat wants it to come to!
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#35 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:48 pm

Mac wrote:No, I live in Nashville. So Emma is going to have to build up one helluva head of steam if I'm going to wishcast her upon myself. :lol:

Thanks for the info.
0 likes   

texasheat

#36 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:49 pm

ha ha ha so what if i do 8-)
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#37 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:50 pm

texasheat wrote:ha ha ha so what if i do 8-)

In case you don't know its called wish-casting and its greatly looked down upon. People will start ignoring you or bashing you, seriously.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#38 Postby rtd2 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:50 pm

Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:
Brent wrote:
Mac wrote:That looks like the same map from the previous advisory. Hey! Something smells fishy. :roll:


Nope... it's slightly farther north and the 120-hour position is NW of the previous one.


I'll take your word for it. But the NHC track is wrong anyway, so there's no point splitting hairs. :lol:


Who cares??? Average 5-day track error: THREE HUNDRED miles.



Except for Dennis! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Houstonia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 829
Age: 61
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.

#39 Postby Houstonia » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:50 pm

Swimdude wrote:
Scorpion wrote:Sorry about that. Just seems to me theres alot of Texans who want this coming to them .


*Sigh* There is. And I'd hate to make it worse, but that would make everybody satisfied. Win-Win.


Geez - I'm sure sick of everyone accusing other people of "wanting a storm" or "-removed-". I think I said this in a previous year - so what?!? Do you think that if ALL the people in Texas wished a storm onto their state, it would happen just because of our wishing power?

I have a friend here in Houston, who every YEAR wishes for the storm of all storm to hit here. You know what I do? I laugh.

At least, in MY mind, God makes the final decision - not our wishes. duh. So please please, I beg of you - please stop with the accusations and let us wish for a storm or wish not for a storm... in peace.
0 likes   

texasheat

#40 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:50 pm

they nailed dennis.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, jhpigott, MetroMike, Sciencerocks and 316 guests