Is Emily a sure thing for the Mexican Coastline?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Is Emily a sure thing for the Mexican Coastline?

#1 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:26 am

I don't think so. IMO
By the way she continues to becoming
better organized with each passing hour.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes   

jhamps10

#2 Postby jhamps10 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:28 am

I personally beg to differ. Dry air is sucking into the core, and convection is not as strong as in previous hours.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#3 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:28 am

Let me guess...its gonna pass through the Yucatan Channel and ride up Galveston Bay?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7404
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#4 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:30 am

Cant say for sure
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#5 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:31 am

jhamps10 wrote:I personally beg to differ. Dry air is sucking into the core, and convection is not as strong as in previous hours.


Convection pulses...and usally dimenishes this time of night...nothing to do with too much dry air. Convection doesn't stay constant in weak hurricanes...it's up and down.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#6 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:32 am

gkrangers wrote:Let me guess...its gonna pass through the Yucatan Channel and ride up Galveston Bay?


Nah. I think it would go a little further east like SW LA. though we sure could use the rain. Anyway my point it's just TOO EARLY to call. I guess you guys already forgot TS Cindy was suppose to hit Galveston Bay/Houston and it ended up in N.O.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#7 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:33 am

I don't think Cindy is valid in an argument like this...because of the way the center reformed quite far north. If Cindy's center stayed intact over the Yucatan, Houston probably would have gotten some well needed rain.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#8 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:36 am

its all about the ridge. i personally think it will hit somewhere on the middle-northtx-la coast

Quote:
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7404
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#9 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:37 am

Probably closer to brownsville
0 likes   

gkrangers

#10 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:40 am

Hell probably closer to Mexico City...
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#11 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:41 am

With each passing model agreement, I think so.
0 likes   

User avatar
Galvestongirl
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:13 am

#12 Postby Galvestongirl » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:41 am

I am with gkrangers...its going up galveston bay :A:
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#13 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:42 am

HouTXmetro wrote:With each passing model agreement, I think so.


how can you say that.. with each model its moving it north
0 likes   

gkrangers

#14 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:44 am

hicksta wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:With each passing model agreement, I think so.


how can you say that.. with each model its moving it north
NOGAPS, UKMET, CMC, and GFS all moved south.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#15 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:45 am

Image



......
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#16 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:46 am

hicksta wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:With each passing model agreement, I think so.


how can you say that.. with each model its moving it north


Each model is not moving north...from the NHC discussion tonight:

THE NWS MODELS...GFS AND GFDL...HAVE CHANGED LITTLE
SINCE THE PREVIOUS RUNS...WHILE THE NAVY MODELS...GFDN AND
NOGAPS...HAVE SHIFTED ONLY SLIGHTLY TO THE SOUTH.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#17 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:48 am

i must be blind
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#18 Postby Swimdude » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:50 am

hicksta wrote:its all about the ridge. i personally think it will hit somewhere on the middle-northtx-la coast

Quote:
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



Hey buddy, welcome to the boards, but one of those disclaimers isn't necessary for just a comment or two... Use it when you think someone could misinterpret your forecast as an official one. =)
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#19 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:53 am

hicksta wrote:i must be blind


What models are you referring too? The models that really count...the dynamic models...are about the same. Some of the tropical models appear to shift north but you have to remember that earlier runs initialized Emily at 265...and now its 275...and that will shift the run northward because of that...not because of dynamic shifts in the environment.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#20 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:54 am

you lost me there.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, jhpigott, MetroMike, Sciencerocks and 321 guests