Here is what the 00Z Globals are saying!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#61 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:31 pm

That's actually a good bit further south there at the end. What do you have to say, hicksta?
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#62 Postby Swimdude » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:31 pm

hicksta wrote:where would that put galveston.


Besides under water?
0 likes   

gkrangers

#63 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:32 pm

Stop refreshing the NOGAPs so I can see it! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#64 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:32 pm

jkt21787 wrote:That's actually a good bit further south there at the end. What do you have to say, hicksta?


id have to say itl shift more north..
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#65 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:32 pm

The fact that we are still talking about 4-5 days away and the models have shifted that much north concerns me. Now they could easily shift back south. The main thing to note is that maybe just maybe the High will build as far west or be as strong as first thought or some sort of trough will weaken it. Oh well so much for the "She is going to Mexico" talk for now.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#66 Postby MWatkins » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:33 pm

The 0Z GFS is approx 180NM miles further north at 96 hours...and even the newest NOGAPS guidance wants to take Emily near western Cuba and through the Yucatan channel.

This looks a bit drastic...well...more than a bt drastic compared to the 12Z runs.

Perhaps it's a shift...or perhaps it's something with the strength of the system in the models as opposed to the 12z guidance.

Anyway...I am having connection problems...so I probably wont get a chance to reply....hope this gets through...but concerns for an eventual US landfall have increased some based on what has come out so far. Remember the globals that have come out have previously been the LEFT outliers. Hard to imagine the GFDL and UKMET coming in left of this guidance...

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#67 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:33 pm

hicksta wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:That's actually a good bit further south there at the end. What do you have to say, hicksta?


id have to say itl shift more north..

What a surprise, the model shifts south (although just a bit), but you insist it will go back north.
Sounds like a wish-caster to me.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#68 Postby clfenwi » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:34 pm

looks like a left bend between 96-120 hours keeps the NOGAPS forecast just south of a Texas landfall...
0 likes   

gkrangers

#69 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:34 pm

Echo what MW said...

NOGAPs landfall is further north than the 12z run.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#70 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:35 pm

clfenwi wrote:looks like a left bend between 96-120 hours keeps the NOGAPS forecast just south of a Texas landfall...
The GFS makes a similar hard left, tho not as drastic. Interesting.

Prediction: UKMET visits Bourbon Street again. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#71 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:36 pm

gkrangers wrote:
clfenwi wrote:looks like a left bend between 96-120 hours keeps the NOGAPS forecast just south of a Texas landfall...
The GFS makes a similar hard left, tho not as drastic. Interesting.

Prediction: UKMET visits Bourbon Street again. :lol:

lol i wouldnt be suprised if it would
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#72 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:36 pm

gkrangers wrote:
clfenwi wrote:looks like a left bend between 96-120 hours keeps the NOGAPS forecast just south of a Texas landfall...
The GFS makes a similar hard left, tho not as drastic. Interesting.

Prediction: UKMET visits Bourbon Street again. :lol:

:lol:
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#73 Postby clfenwi » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:39 pm

NOGAPS run is further north than 12Z run pretty much right off the start... *maybe* a touch south of the 18Z run... shows that the intermediate run was not an aberration... pretty significant as every 00/12 run of NOGAPS since Tuesday morning had been saying Yucatan with only slight north/south alterations...[/i]
Last edited by clfenwi on Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#74 Postby mobilebay » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:39 pm

It appears so far that the models are seeing a weakness in the ridge around Jamaica to western Cuba. However once in the GOm high pressure seems to build back over Emily pushing her westwerd. All of this is subject to change though.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#75 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:41 pm

true.
0 likes   

User avatar
Radar
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 425
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Biloxi,MS

#76 Postby Radar » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:42 pm

That is what is so hard to predict about these storms, it is all in the timing. If everything doesnt synchornize as the meterologists expect it too it really begins a whole new ball game for them. I just hope that they can get a handle on Emily and where it is going soon so people in harms way can get prepared.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#77 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:43 pm

mobilebay wrote:It appears so far that the models are seeing a weakness in the ridge around Jamaica to western Cuba. However once in the GOm high pressure seems to build back over Emily pushing her westwerd. All of this is subject to change though.

The question remains though at what latitude Emily makes it before turning west. That could determine a Texas or Mexico hit.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#78 Postby dwg71 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:44 pm

one thing people are forgetting is Emily, she's been heading almost due west 275 for a couple of hours now.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#79 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:44 pm

jkt21787 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:It appears so far that the models are seeing a weakness in the ridge around Jamaica to western Cuba. However once in the GOm high pressure seems to build back over Emily pushing her westwerd. All of this is subject to change though.

The question remains though at what latitude Emily makes it before turning west. That could determine a Texas or Mexico hit.



i doubt a mexico. with it near cuba.. doubt it
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#80 Postby clfenwi » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:45 pm

Having seen the NOGAPS output now, I am really curious as to what the ECMWF is going to offer... it has been saying Yucatan even longer than NOGAPS had been... since Monday night... again, with only slight alterations of point of landfall on the Peninsula...
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: riapal and 185 guests