Emily Weakening....or just reorganizing?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricane Cheese
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 12:40 am
Location: Green Bay, WI (UWGB Earth Science Alum)

Emily Weakening....or just reorganizing?

#1 Postby Hurricane Cheese » Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 am

Alright, someone had to start a thread on this...

The eye is no longer apparent on the IR, and the storm doesn't seem quite as impressive as earlier today....

Image

What gives? ERC? Encountering a lil shear?
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#2 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:51 am

What I see is that the cdo is getting slightly bigger/expending. Look at the northwest quad(I would need a few more frames to confirm it) Could be outflow returning. The shear is backing/Retragrading slowly. I think this will likely spin back up fast.
0 likes   

User avatar
Huckster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 394
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:33 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#3 Postby Huckster » Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:59 am

I doubt the storm is weakening. These kinds of fluctuations in appearance are common and not necessarily indicative of an overall weakening. I agree with Matt...the NW quadrant of the storm looks better. In fact, the whole western semi-circle of the storm looks better. It seems that the outflow is improving there, and if that's the case, at least holding its own is almost guaranteed, and further strengthening is a distinct possibility.
0 likes   
God lufode middaneard swa þæt he sealde his ancennedan Sunu, þæt nan ne forwurðe þe on hine gelyfð, ac hæbbe þæt ece lif. - Old English/Anglo-Saxon, John 3:16

Derek Ortt

#4 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:09 am

whats going on with the NHC sat loops? That one says 1515 UTC
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#5 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:11 am

It says 7:15 Utc to me.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:24 am

it was my browser. Had to delete the cookies

does look to have weakened somewhat. The eye is very poorly defined
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#7 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:55 am

If I didn't know any better, I would think she was just a cluster of thunderstorms.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#8 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:57 am

A big suprize that would be....On the radar shows that it has a well defined eye. It has not changed that much. The eye is just clouded over at this time. The eye is 10 nmi wide. Plus outflow is improving slowly...
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#9 Postby bahamaswx » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:59 am

Agreed. The eye is TINY, and while it is indeed there, it's simply too small and clouded over to appear on satellite.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#10 Postby wxwatcher91 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 5:16 am

NHC mentioned a possible EWRC in their discussion
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneGirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5839
Age: 60
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Clare, Michigan
Contact:

#11 Postby HurricaneGirl » Fri Jul 15, 2005 6:45 am

Yup! EWRC.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#12 Postby stormie_skies » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:22 am

Thats what Im betting on, too .... she is much bigger and looks much better than she did when I went to sleep last night....here's betting she just needed a wider eye to go with her growing body... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148502
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#13 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:24 am

12 mb pressure rise since last recon so more weak.[/b]
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
EDR1222
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1253
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

#14 Postby EDR1222 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:35 am

She looks weaker to me than she did last night.

Maybe some of the shear got to her
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#15 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:53 am

She is weakening, just a little bit, because she is reorganizing. Once the second eyewall takes over, then Emily will begin to restrengthen.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#16 Postby Wthrman13 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:02 am

HURAKAN wrote:She is weakening, just a little bit, because she is reorganizing. Once the second eyewall takes over, then Emily will begin to restrengthen.


There is a large upper level low very apparent on water vapor centered over the Bahamas, with a large area of westerly upper-level winds basically covering the entire western Carribbean. Some of this can be clearly seen impacting Emily on the SW side. This has probably contributed to weakening, and could very well keep it in check through its entire trek through the western Carribbean. Shear is a notoriously difficult parameter to forecast because it depends on getting the wind speeds and directions right at multiple levels in the atmosphere.
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#17 Postby djtil » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:06 am

shear is really becoming evident on IR.......i look for a little further weakening until it subsides.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#18 Postby MGC » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:07 am

Emily is moving into an area of increasing UL shear. I doubt Emily gets back to cat 4 intensity. Hopefully she will weaken even more as she approaches the Yucatan......MGC
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

#19 Postby Derecho » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:50 am

There's always a weird sort of denial that goes on when a storm actually does weaken significantly and for a good period of time... ITS JUST REORGANIZING NO REALLY IT IS THIS IS VERY TEMPORARY IT WILL START STRENTGTHENING AGAIN FIVE MINUTES FROM NOW ITS JUST AN EWRC BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH....

In this case it happened to coincide with an actual eyewall replacement but you'd have to be blind not to see the significant shear, erosion of convection, and massive surface outflow boundary vomited out to the west.....until the westerly shear lets up, and that may be quite a while, it's not going to get back to what it was late last night.
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#20 Postby djtil » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:41 pm

its the nature of the beast.

the average weather fan wants a strong storm and they want it to hit the US.......and anything or anyone who suggests that the above 2 may not be happening is met with skepticism.....just ask Avila :lol:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, jhpigott, MetroMike, Sciencerocks and 312 guests