I think we may have a Cat 5.. right now..
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Josephine96
I think we may have a Cat 5.. right now..
Just peeking at an IR image of Emily, and I think we may honestly have a Cat 5 right now..
She looks beautiful on satellite.. A lot of reds wrapped around her eye and eye wall, and she even has some of the red around her NE quadrant where her most dangerous part of the storm is..
Thank GOD she didn't pass directly over Jamaica.. but prayers going out for the Yucatan and for Mexico or Texas when she moves into the BOC.
She looks beautiful on satellite.. A lot of reds wrapped around her eye and eye wall, and she even has some of the red around her NE quadrant where her most dangerous part of the storm is..
Thank GOD she didn't pass directly over Jamaica.. but prayers going out for the Yucatan and for Mexico or Texas when she moves into the BOC.
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
- Galvestongirl
- Category 1

- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:13 am
-
Josephine96
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
AlabamaDave
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:44 pm
What is the deal the last couple of years... it's as if Cat 4 and Cat 5 hurricanes are becoming almost routine. Last year we had Charley -- almost Cat-5, Frances -- almost Cat-5, and Ivan as a bona fide Cat-5. This season, in JULY... Dennis almost reaches Cat-5 and we now have Emily one week later teetering on the verge of being one.
0 likes
-
Mac
-
Mac
-
Mac
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
Josephine96
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Brent wrote:Recon will be fine... they've flown into Camille, Gilbert, Mitch, Ivan, Allen, all powerful monsters.
I agree... I think it's a Cat 5.
Yes, recon will be fine. It's not the pure wind speed that makes the job dangerous. They could take Camille and those other powerhouse storms. It's the turbulence that can be the problem, but as they say, that all depends on the storm. Some of the category fours and fives don't produce much turbulence whereas some of the tropical storms will give them a really bumpy right. It's the downdrafts that pose the greatest threat to the crew. However, since the near-tragedy with the NOAA crew in Gilbert, recon stays in the mid-levels (10,000ft) to avoid problems with downdrafts.
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
- AJC3
- Admin

- Posts: 4144
- Age: 62
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
JtSmarts wrote:near-tragedy with the NOAA crew in Gilbert
What happened in Gilbert?
I think he meant Hugo. Never heard of any near tragedy in Gilbert. In fact, I had a friend and fellow met that was on the (in)famous flight into Gilbert that recorded the lowest SLP in Atlantic basin history.
I don't have the link, but you can read about the Hugo event somewhere on line. An S2Ker to remain forever nameless led me to that story the night before my first NOAA recon flight. I remain eternally grateful to him for doing that. Fortunately though, my recon flight was perhaps the most uneventful in NOAA history.
0 likes


