gkrangers wrote:Ok but they flew through the SE and NW quads.Scorpion wrote:Max Wind=127 mph NE quad
Max wind on surface= 114.3 mph
Guess I was a little overestimating it with the 100 knot estimate
Actually, it was the SE and the W quads.
Moderator: S2k Moderators


They didn't make a straight pass across?senorpepr wrote:gkrangers wrote:Ok but they flew through the SE and NW quads.Scorpion wrote:Max Wind=127 mph NE quad
Max wind on surface= 114.3 mph
Guess I was a little overestimating it with the 100 knot estimate
Actually, it was the SE and the W quads.




I still do. Every thought that traverses from your brain to your keyboard is completely baseless.Scorpion wrote:Yet people several hours ago were dismissing my thoughts that Emily would be 100 knots at landfall.
gkrangers wrote:I still do. Every thought that traverses from your brain to your keyboard is completely baseless.Scorpion wrote:Yet people several hours ago were dismissing my thoughts that Emily would be 100 knots at landfall.
Pressure is up only 3 millibars since last recon, which I see as a negative. Organization is becoming better.
Scorpion wrote:Yet people several hours ago were dismissing my thoughts that Emily would be 100 knots at landfall.


http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hhc/watl/hh3.watl.20050717.gifScorpion wrote:I go by trends. Lately, the trend has been for big storms to weaken before landfall. This is clearly happening.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 378 guests