Emily strengthening, weakening or maintaining at landfall?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

Emily strengthening, weakening or maintaining at landfall?

#1 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:10 am

This was always a problematic issue with the 2nd landfall. The NHC said they thought it would emerge and probably reintensify, however, it didn't stay all that long over the Yucatan.

I caught Bastardi's video this morning and he stated that ridging would be building overtop as the ULL moves off SW from the Bay of Campeche (per 200mb GFS). He showed how the storm was expanding on its western side. And while it has done some of that on the northern and western sides, the SW is still fairly weak looking (assuming that would have to do with whatever shear is left down there from the ULL).

I would think it's probably going to re-strengthen some and perhaps tighten up a bit, but I'm not convinced how low the pressure could get this time. The water in the vicinity is in the mid-80's so I guess the fuel is available.

Steve
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#2 Postby djtil » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:13 am

i think she will under go rapid intensification at 24-48 hours......will maintain until then....i also doubt recon finds her as strong as the offical advisory.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#3 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:15 am

I don't think she will be either djitl. I checked on the SSD with the forecast points and they show "3" at landfall. I haven't looked at the advisories, but that sounds about right to me seeing as the structure is basically still intact.

Steve
0 likes   

patiloman
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:35 am
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Contact:

Re: Emily strengthening, weakening or maintaining at landfal

#4 Postby patiloman » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:18 am

I'm new to the site, any chance I could get a link or something to Bastardi's video? I've been tracking and watching hurricanes since I was in the fifth grade, and my dad introduced me to this site. Any chance I could get someone with experience to help me out with sites with vids or loops to look at, or some with important info?
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#5 Postby dwg71 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:22 am

go to yahoo.com and look in the weather area, you should find it there...
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#6 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:24 am

Definately strengthening. From 100 mph, possibly to near cat. 4 once again.
0 likes   

User avatar
baitism
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS

#7 Postby baitism » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:35 am

Farther north would mean more time over very warm water. Which would not be good at all.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#8 Postby Brent » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:39 am

Steve wrote:I don't think she will be either djitl. I checked on the SSD with the forecast points and they show "3" at landfall. I haven't looked at the advisories, but that sounds about right to me seeing as the structure is basically still intact.

Steve


Official forecast takes her up to 100 kt or 115 mph at landfall.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
EDR1222
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1253
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

#9 Postby EDR1222 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:00 pm

Looks like not to much in the short term. As of 2 PM she is barely a hurricane with 75 mph winds. I think the ULL took more of a toll on her than they thought it would. But the NHC does say conditions should become favorable for strengthening by tomorrow, and it looks like the ULL is finally moving off to the southwest on wv imagery.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#10 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:15 pm

Official forecast takes her up to 100 kt or 115 mph at landfall.


That would take one heck of a jump in intensity... But then again, we saw Dennis; it is possible.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#11 Postby Anonymous » Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:19 pm

Keep in mind...it had 36 hours over water...this could happen:::

~ 75 mph
~ 80 mph
~ 90 mph
~105 mph
~115 mph

That is about 10 hours...things can change quick.
0 likes   

mike18xx

#12 Postby mike18xx » Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:12 pm

Swimdude wrote:
Official forecast takes her up to 100 kt or 115 mph at landfall.
That would take one heck of a jump in intensity... But then again, we saw Dennis; it is possible.

It's very possible; storms can intensify explosively near the Mexican coast:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
0 likes   

mike18xx

#13 Postby mike18xx » Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:21 pm

From satellite appearance, slowed speed, and SSTs, I'd say there's an at least reasonable chance Emily could make it all the way back to cat-4.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

#14 Postby tailgater » Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:55 pm

mike18xx wrote:From satellite appearance, slowed speed, and SSTs, I'd say there's an at least reasonable chance Emily could make it all the way back to cat-4.

I'll agree with you again mike, might may it all the back to a *** 5(unconfirmed). SSH, I didn't say that out loud.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests