Emily's is over?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

Emily's is over?

#1 Postby Pebbles » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:26 am

I just find it very interesting that only now is Emily's eastern eyewall making it on land and the northwest eyewall starting to affect Mexico for the past hour or so. You know.. the part with the highest winds... Why have most started talking like Emily is over? Just something I have noticed with most storms is everyone moves on to the next storm at ... if not before ... storms are 'declared' to make landfall. In the case of Emily and the fact she is moving westward... Landfall was just when the heaviest winds were only beginning to effect land. Just an observation to note...
0 likes   

User avatar
MBismyPlayground
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: myrtle beach, sc
Contact:

#2 Postby MBismyPlayground » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:32 am

Pebbles, I noticed the same thing. I am curious as to the damage that Emily is creating in Mexico and S. Texas. I think it is a bit quick to say that it is over, until damage can be determined. The rain and winds are still there, and well it ain't over til its over. Plus now just hearing tornado damage in Brownsville.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

#3 Postby gboudx » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:43 am

My guess is because it didn't make landfall in the US. And there aren't any(or many) posters down in that area of Mexico to report the conditions.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#4 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:43 am

gboudx wrote:My guess is because it didn't make landfall in the US. And there aren't any(or many) posters down in that area of Mexico to report the conditions.


You hit the nail on the head.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#5 Postby dhweather » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:45 am

If it does not directly affect the US, then generally, it gets very little attention.

Also, that area is sparsely populated, so reports will be few and far between.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

#6 Postby Pebbles » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:47 am

Brent wrote:
gboudx wrote:My guess is because it didn't make landfall in the US. And there aren't any(or many) posters down in that area of Mexico to report the conditions.


You hit the nail on the head.


I would agree with that... if I didn't notice the same phenomenon with Dennis. :wink: and most storms last year ...an exception that I can think off the top of my head being maybe frances ...because she was expected to go back over water...
0 likes   

Big-Iguana

#7 Postby Big-Iguana » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:50 am

My best guess is it is cause it's in Mexico, so it boils down to Nimby-itis.

Nimby:Not in my backyard= persona non grata de mexico....Also known as ethnocentricity.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#8 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:55 am

Pebbles wrote:
Brent wrote:
gboudx wrote:My guess is because it didn't make landfall in the US. And there aren't any(or many) posters down in that area of Mexico to report the conditions.


You hit the nail on the head.


I would agree with that... if I didn't notice the same phenomenon with Dennis. :wink: and most storms last year ...an exception that I can think off the top of my head being maybe frances ...because she was expected to go back over water...


Well... since this is the tropics board, once landfall is done, people here don't focus on it. We have a Severe Weather and a US Weather Watch board for inland affects. Only if something is over water does it generally garner attention.
0 likes   
#neversummer

kevin

#9 Postby kevin » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:55 am

NIMBY? Enthnocentrism?
:uarrow: :?:
0 likes   

wxcrazytwo

#10 Postby wxcrazytwo » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:58 am

MBismyPlayground wrote:Pebbles, I noticed the same thing. I am curious as to the damage that Emily is creating in Mexico and S. Texas. I think it is a bit quick to say that it is over, until damage can be determined. The rain and winds are still there, and well it ain't over til its over. Plus now just hearing tornado damage in Brownsville.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.


DOES ANYONE KNOW THE STATUS OF BROWNSVILL AND THE DAMAGE SO FAR?
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5444
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#11 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:00 am

I'm worried about the damage since she is moving so slowly. Prolonged rain and wind from a slow moving hurricane do a lot more damage than a fast moving storm.

I was looking at the water vapor loop this morning and was wondering what was causing her slow speed.
The circulation is likely to be around for a while so the storm could go back out over water if a digging trough came along or a high built to her south.
Usually troughs shear rather than steer weak circulations though.
0 likes   

Rainband

#12 Postby Rainband » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:00 am

There have been tornadoes :( Not surprsing with a storm of this intensity.
0 likes   

wxcrazytwo

#13 Postby wxcrazytwo » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:02 am

dhweather wrote:If it does not directly affect the US, then generally, it gets very little attention.

Also, that area is sparsely populated, so reports will be few and far between.


DH, I hardly call 106,202,903 (July 2005 est.) sparsely populated. I just think because it is Mexico who cares. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

#14 Postby Portastorm » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:03 am

Here in the capital of Texas (Austin), some 300 miles north of Brownsville, we're getting some outside feeder band action this morning. So far, a fairly good soaking is occurring, thank God! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#15 Postby dhweather » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:11 am

wxcrazytwo wrote:
dhweather wrote:If it does not directly affect the US, then generally, it gets very little attention.

Also, that area is sparsely populated, so reports will be few and far between.


DH, I hardly call 106,202,903 (July 2005 est.) sparsely populated. I just think because it is Mexico who cares. :roll:


I think the landfall area, where the core passed over with the max winds,
had a town of 20,000 nearby, that's about it. I'm not trying to minimize it, it's a major hurricane making landfall. My point is that the mass media
doesn't really care about hurricanes that do no affect the US, or ones that
do not kill thousands, such as Mitch.

Think of Don Henley's "Dirty Laundry"
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

#16 Postby Pebbles » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:28 am

dhweather wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:
dhweather wrote:If it does not directly affect the US, then generally, it gets very little attention.

Also, that area is sparsely populated, so reports will be few and far between.


DH, I hardly call 106,202,903 (July 2005 est.) sparsely populated. I just think because it is Mexico who cares. :roll:


I think the landfall area, where the core passed over with the max winds,
had a town of 20,000 nearby, that's about it. I'm not trying to minimize it, it's a major hurricane making landfall. My point is that the mass media
doesn't really care about hurricanes that do no affect the US, or ones that
do not kill thousands, such as Mitch.

Think of Don Henley's "Dirty Laundry"


Actually i've been watching the major news media outlets and they have been on and off reporting from the storm all morning *winks*
0 likes   

User avatar
BayouVenteux
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 775
Age: 64
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)

#17 Postby BayouVenteux » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:30 am

Just wondering...anyone watch las noticias on Univision or Telemundo in the last day or two? I'd bet the coverage is just a tad (he said with a touch of sarcasm) more extensive than the U.S. news sources.
0 likes   

Stormtrack
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:11 pm
Location: Angleton, Tx

#18 Postby Stormtrack » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:32 am

According to a reporter in La Pesca, Mexico they evacuated the whole town. There was nobody there other than the news team. He didn't think there was much damage.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#19 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:33 am

wxcrazytwo wrote:
MBismyPlayground wrote:Pebbles, I noticed the same thing. I am curious as to the damage that Emily is creating in Mexico and S. Texas. I think it is a bit quick to say that it is over, until damage can be determined. The rain and winds are still there, and well it ain't over til its over. Plus now just hearing tornado damage in Brownsville.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.


DOES ANYONE KNOW THE STATUS OF BROWNSVILL AND THE DAMAGE SO FAR?


I suspect any damage is confined to maybe some trees/limbs here and there. I haven't seen any wind gusts over 60 mph reported there.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#20 Postby TexasStooge » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:40 am

Yeah, Emily was pushed into Northern Mexico because of that high pressure cap settling over the North Texas region as well as Mississippi, Louisiana, and Arkansas.

Darn you, High Pressure cap! Darn you to heck!!
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests