Accuweather track

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Accuweather track

#1 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:48 pm

accuweathers forecast track has it going out to sea, wonder what they see different from NHC
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#2 Postby wxwatcher91 » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 pm

they are probably following a different model... the models are wacky
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:52 pm

they are following ALL of the guidance
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#4 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:55 pm

Here is the problem I see:

NHC: It seems that the cold front won't be strong enough to take the storm out to sea, thereafter, it will meander in a weak environment.

ACCU: The cold front will be strong enought to take the storm out to sea, thereafter, the system shouldn't be a land problem but a marine hazard.
0 likes   

User avatar
curtinnc
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Cornelius, NC
Contact:

#5 Postby curtinnc » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:57 pm

Hey Derek, then what is the TPC/NHC up to? They working on just the "choice" models that they tend towards?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#6 Postby Steve » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:59 pm

>>ACCU: The cold front will be strong enought to take the storm out to sea, thereafter, the system shouldn't be a land problem but a marine hazard.

Obvoiusly Bastardi is rogue to the company again (or at least was this morning). Unless he put out a column update since he cut his tropical video, he has it potentially getting stuck but considers the entire forecast of both systems problematic.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#7 Postby TS Zack » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:07 pm

All Hurricane Models have joined in pulling it back West except for the LBAR... Derek, what models are you looking at?

Yea, all the Globals take it out to see but not the Hurricane Models.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#8 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:09 pm

the hurricane models are absolutely useless as this is not a barotropic set-up. There is strong shear over the system.

If there's a horizontal temp gradient away from the cyclone, which can easily be detected as that is what causes the shear due to the thermal wind equation, the barotropic models become a pile of dung to say the least
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#9 Postby Steve » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:15 pm

I agree with you completely. However, the Globals IMHO are complete garbage at this point too. We'll know in 48 hours which sets had a better handle this time around.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#10 Postby deltadog03 » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:16 pm

and to answer the question they are bias to the GFS and GFDL
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8250
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#11 Postby jasons2k » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:19 pm

I believe JB's update said that he expects it to eventually move NW and impact the Carolinas.

He also expects SW Carib to essentailly follow Emily's path, threatening S. TX/N. Mexico with the caveat nothing can be set until a center forms.
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

#12 Postby perk » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:19 pm

Well Derek having said all that what do you think Franklin will do.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#13 Postby Wthrman13 » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:45 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:the hurricane models are absolutely useless as this is not a barotropic set-up. There is strong shear over the system.

If there's a horizontal temp gradient away from the cyclone, which can easily be detected as that is what causes the shear due to the thermal wind equation, the barotropic models become a pile of dung to say the least


Which barotropic models are you referring to? The only barotropic model that I know of that is run operationally is the LBAR. The BAM models aren't really barotropic, but use vertically averaged horizontal winds from the GFS fields to calculate the storm trajectory, plus the beta effect.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#14 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:01 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:they are following ALL of the guidance


Derek it sounds like you are not to happy with NHC's forecast track. You know sometimes you gotta go with instincts/past experience instead of the model guidance. These guys have been doing this for many many years they know what they are doing, trust them. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#15 Postby southerngale » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:33 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:the hurricane models are absolutely useless as this is not a barotropic set-up. There is strong shear over the system.

If there's a horizontal temp gradient away from the cyclone, which can easily be detected as that is what causes the shear due to the thermal wind equation, the barotropic models become a pile of dung to say the least


Strong shear? Someone just said a little while ago that there was absolutely ZERO shear over the system. It can't be both. Image
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#16 Postby Brent » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:35 pm

Please show me this "shear". :?:
0 likes   
#neversummer

Derek Ortt

#17 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:39 pm

I'm not trusting this loop at all.

The other models, BAM Suite, really only work in a barotropic environment. The mean steering flow is most accurate in a barotropic environment. Once we get baroclinic instability, that method doesn't work. Found that out in a research project earlier in the year
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#18 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:40 pm

the shear is from the anti-cyclone. Very hard not to notice
0 likes   

ericinmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1573
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 11:15 pm
Location: Miami Lakes, FL

#19 Postby ericinmia » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:42 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
air360
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 447
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

#20 Postby air360 » Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 pm

jschlitz wrote:I believe JB's update said that he expects it to eventually move NW and impact the Carolinas.


whoa thats a new one...all ive heard so far was FL or fish...lol....on what basis does he see that happening :think: ? anyone else have ability to see what JB says on this system..im not able to see his updates...
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests