More possible BRAC closings!

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

More possible BRAC closings!

#1 Postby pojo » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:19 pm

Panel Adds Bases For Closure, Realignment Consideration
By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service


WASHINGTON, July 20, 2005 – The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission voted to add several military installations to a list for closure consideration during July 19 hearings at the Dirksen Senate Building here.
The previous day, senior Defense Department officials provided testimony before the commission regarding the merits of keeping open various military organizations.

At the start of the July 19 hearing, BRAC Commission Chairman Anthony Principi noted his commission might tab more installations for consideration for closure or realignment.

However, "we are not here today to produce a final list of closures and realignments," Principi said, noting the commission wouldn't submit a complete list of bases affected by this round of BRAC until late August.

Bases the BRAC commission added during the July 19 hearing to the list for consideration to close or realign include:


-Naval Air Station Brunswick, Maine
-Navy Broadway Complex, San Diego
-Naval Master Jet Base, Naval Air Station Oceana, Va.
-Pope Air Force Base, N.C.
-Galena Airport Forward Operating Location, Alaska
-Defense Finance and Accounting Service facilities located at Buckley Annex, Colo.; Columbus, Ohio; and Indianapolis
-Naval Postgraduate School and Defense Language Institute, Monterey, Calif.
-Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
-Bureau of Navy Medicine, Potomac Annex, Washington, D.C.
-Air Force Medical Command, Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, D.C.
-Tricare Management Activity, Office of the Surgeons General Military Departments, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, all in Virginia.

During the hearing, the commission also voted not to place several installations on the list for possible closure or realignment. For example, commission members voted to exclude the Marine Corps Recruit Depot in San Diego, the Naval Shipyard in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and Moody Air Force Base, Ga., from consideration for closure or realignment under the 2005 BRAC Act.

All bases identified for possible realignment or closure will be reviewed before a final commission vote on all BRAC-identified installations is taken in late August.

On May 13, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld submitted his BRAC recommendations that 33 military installations be closed and 29 realigned out of a total of 318 bases. The additional bases identified by the commission for consideration for closure or realignment, Principi noted, will be added to the secretary's list.

The BRAC commission's additions weren't made to second-guess Rumsfeld's picks, Principi emphasized, but instead demonstrate the commission's efforts to take a broader view of what other bases may be closed or realigned.

"Our deliberations today may add more bases for further consideration -- and consideration only -- not because we have determined that we need to realign or close more bases than the secretary of defense has recommended, but because we want to make sure the best possible closure or realignment choices are made consistent with the criteria established in law," Principi said.

On April 1, President Bush appointed the independent BRAC commission. The commission is obligated to "consider all options" for base closures or realignments, Principi said at the July 19 hearing.

Under the 2005 BRAC Act the principle criteria for keeping bases open, or closing or realigning them, is military value.

The nine-member BRAC commission panel is obligated to send its recommendations to the president by Sept. 8.

The president has until Sept. 23 to accept all recommendations or reject all of them. Congress will have 45 days to accept the president's recommendations or reject them whole. The Defense Department will be obligated to act on all congressionally approved recommendations.

http://www.defenselink.mil

***General Mitchell IAP-ARS, WI is on the closure list and the BRAC commission wants to send us to Pope AFB/Fort Bragg, NC... now with Pope on the list... it is getting ridiculous.... They are trying to centralize the military so the terrorists have an easier target to hit... that really makes a lot of sense!
0 likes   

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#2 Postby streetsoldier » Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:32 pm

One has to wonder who's minding the store sometimes, pojo.

The LAST thing we should do is centralize our military/naval forces; but then, a host of smaller locales will make it easier to target those which have not been "hardened".

What to do, what to do? :eek:
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

#3 Postby pojo » Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:44 pm

streetsoldier wrote:One has to wonder who's minding the store sometimes, pojo.

The LAST thing we should do is centralize our military/naval forces; but then, a host of smaller locales will make it easier to target those which have not been "hardened".

What to do, what to do? :eek:


My point exactly Bill. I know we are trying to mold the military forces due to the war, but we have to stop spending WAY to much on this war and start focusing on the situations we have here with the base closings!

Its coming down to the point where I may have to turn in my commissioning paperwork... I was going to wait until I graduate from Western Illinois, but it may not work that way... OTS is 14 weeks.... I don't have 14 weeks available right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146228
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#4 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:47 pm

I hope that Fort Buchanan does not close here as it is a source of many jobs in Puerto Rico.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#5 Postby azsnowman » Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:12 am

From what I've seen in my years, it's actually not a BAD thing.......there is/was/still SO much WASTE but then again, look at Congress, they just gave themselves yet ANOTHER PAY RAISE :grr: AH WELL, can't say, "I told ya so!"

Dennis
0 likes   

User avatar
tomboudreau
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1869
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:07 pm
Location: Carnegie, PA
Contact:

#6 Postby tomboudreau » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:40 pm

Nice to see that New England has another base on that list :roll: . They close down that shop, plus the others (Sub base in Groton, Naval station in NH and Maine, Otis out on the Cape, etc.) and you pretty much leave New England defenseless. Sounds pretty fair, eh?
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

#7 Postby pojo » Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:12 pm

Sorry to say, but a good percentage of the major bases to close are north of the Mason-Dixon line. War is NOT fought in warm climates! Afghanistan, for instance, is in the mountains and it is really cold and snowy during the winter time. Centralize the military.... sure lets do that, the terrorists have an easy target then! :roll: :roll: :roll:
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests