According to the person who took this picture, the depth is not perceived correctly where the road was washed out, it is much deeper than it appears.

Moderator: S2k Moderators




ivanhater wrote:wxmann_91 wrote:Wow.
If Dennis' eye had just come a few miles west of where it did Pensacola would've been wiped off the map.
we made it through ivan, we wouldnt be off the map

ericinmia wrote:ivanhater wrote:wxmann_91 wrote:Wow.
If Dennis' eye had just come a few miles west of where it did Pensacola would've been wiped off the map.
we made it through ivan, we wouldnt be off the map
Once again, don't compare the two. They were much different in much more than wind speed.
Its like throwing a peach at someone, and then throwing a granny smith apple. There is going to be a noticeable difference

ericinmia wrote::roll:
Do you personally know the winds at your house?
You were on the weak side of a stronger storm, which happened to be moving faster. Ivan was a slow and weaker storm.
But the key here...
When you have multiple storms come through the same area in a couple years time frame. The first storms cause the most damage, becuase they destroy the weaker items in nature. This leaves only the stronger more resilient things... thus why less damage would occur even in a stronger storm.
But you were on the weaker side of it. I am sure the people that went through the eye would STRONGLY disagree with you. Any real met. knows the difference, and it has been argued on here too many times. I am done.
-Eric

ericinmia wrote:Nice...
Considering i own two houses there. One that had only minor damage in Ivan, and then major roof damage in Dennis. Both in Pensecola west of the I-10 bridge by a few blocks. I think i know a little about the storms.
If there was something weak that wasn't cut down. That is YOUR problem.
I give up on your ignorance.
Post all you want, i won't respond here.
-Eric

nicdeedoop wrote:


Users browsing this forum: KirbyDude25, pepecool20 and 135 guests